• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
27 July, 2026
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Brighton

Council urged to dump i360 seafront tower plan

by reporter
Wednesday 16 Jun, 2010 at 8:26AM
A A
5

Campaigners are calling on the council to bring an end to plans for a 150m tall viewing tower on Brighton beach.

A petition against the proposed i360 tower, designed by London Eye architects Marks Barfield, will be presented to Brighton and Hove City Council’s cabinet when they meet on Thursday (June 17) at Hove Town Hall, in Norton Road, at 4pm.

The document, signed by 15 residents via the council’s e-petitions website, reads: “Scrap the current plans the construct the i360, as it will ruin Brighton’s historic Georgian seafront. As of June 2009 another £20m pounds were needed to complete the project and we do not feel that the attraction is worth this amount of trouble or money.

“It may provide a nice view from above, but from street and beach level, this attraction will not do one of Britain’s most iconic seafronts any favours and it’s the locals that will have to live with it.

“The locals will not pay the £7 fee to “ride” more than once or twice. The falling numbers of tourists visiting the Spinnaker Tower in Portsmouth (which as a city, is far more similar to Brighton than London (and it’s eye) is) adds proof of the short-lived public interest in such attractions.”

The tower was originally planned to be built two years ago but has been on hold because of financial difficulties.

Some piles were driven into the site, at the land end of the derelict West Pier, earlier this year and part of the pier wreckage was removed in order to satisfy a condition of the i360’s planning permission.

Businesses have argued it will boost the local economy.

Support quality, independent, local journalism that matters. Donate here.
ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 5

  1. Franziska says:
    16 years ago

    I agree wholeheartedly with the residents.

    Reply
  2. caes says:
    16 years ago

    i thought it was dumped but no one told the people concerned

    Reply
  3. jon says:
    16 years ago

    What is it with miserable people who can’t see the beauty in this ? A tall wonder for Brighton,fun and TIME must move on EVRYWHERE.Its called PAST-FUTURE.There is no harm in mixing future with past.And many old vic buildings look tatty anyway these days.
    I hope this goes ahead,and im sure im in the majority

    Reply
  4. Sara says:
    16 years ago

    As a resident of Regency Square, who pays a considerable percentage of rent for the great location of my abode, I do not wish to see a ghastly, plastic looking object ruining my seascape. I’m all for progress, but as above mentions with Gunwharf’s Spinnaker Tower, visits are flailing now. At least the S.Tower is part of a modern complex in a shopping centre – the i360 is not this. It would be more suited down by Brighton Marina, not obscuring part of Brightons iconic Regency esplanade.

    Reply
  5. jon says:
    16 years ago

    Lol,it is in no way ”ghastly”.Its not all pretty victorian motifed up the shaft,no.True.
    This tower will be good for the city,what is aas much modern as victorian city.
    And i’m sure many would flock to see the views every year.I think the admission may be cheaper than Spinnaker,for a start.
    And i don’t think many structures would get built anywhere if the objections of a few richer folk were the main consideration.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

Man arrested after rooftop stand-off closes roads in centre of Brighton

Council urged to dump i360 seafront tower plan

Madrophenia: Madness ride the ska wave on to Brighton Beach

Absence and attendance matter much more than admissions

After my cardiac arrest, life-saving bus driver proved just the ticket

Man suspected of stoking tensions at demo

Hove nursery reaches strong standard, according to official watchdog

Broken-down train causes rush-hour rail chaos

Brighton rapist jailed for life

Public to vote on neighbourhood plan

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
‘Alive At The Barn’ Music Festival – Day 1 report

‘Alive At The Barn’ Music Festival – Day 1 report

27 July 2026
It’s Madness again ‘On The Beach’

It’s Madness again ‘On The Beach’

27 July 2026
Yard Act: ‘We Make Hits’

Yard Act: ‘We Make Hits’

26 July 2026
Madrophenia: Madness ride the ska wave on to Brighton Beach

Madrophenia: Madness ride the ska wave on to Brighton Beach

24 July 2026
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Council submits plans for £65m new King Alfred Leisure Centre

Rising costs of King Alfred scheme prompt questions

by Sarah Booker-Lewis - local democracy reporter
27 July 2026
1

The rising cost of plans to build a new King Alfred Leisure Centre and the amount spent so far have...

Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex trounced by Yorkshire at Hove in One Day Cup

by Paul Weaver - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
26 July 2026
0

Yorkshire 325-7 (48 overs) Sussex Sharks 140 (27.5 overs) Yorkshire (4 points) beat Sussex (0 points) by 184 runs (DL)...

Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex well beaten in One Day Cup at Durham

by Thomas Ridley - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
24 July 2026
0

Durham 352-5 (50 overs) Sussex 280 (43.5 overs) Durham (4 points) beat Sussex (0 points) by 72 runs A magnificent...

Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex fall short in One Day Cup opener

by Blake Bint - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
22 July 2026
0

Glamorgan 295-8 (50 overs) Sussex Sharks 283-8 (50 overs) Glamorgan (4 points) beat Sussex (0 points) by 12 runs Glamorgan’s...

Load More
June 2010
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« May   Jul »

RSS From Sussex News

  • Armed police brought in to deal with siege 27 July 2026
  • Two men arrested for helping prisoner who absconded 26 July 2026
  • Go ahead for £20m rubbish and recycling depot and solar farm 24 July 2026
  • Group leave woman injured in early hours attack 23 July 2026
  • Fatboy Slim helps save Brighton Music Venue 23 July 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News