Councillors have given their backing to talks with the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI) to operate beach lifeguards in Brighton and Hove from next year.
Currently, Brighton and Hove City Council manages the service in-house but is looking at other options for the £480,000 summer service.
A report to the council’s Culture, Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Economic Development Committee on Thursday (18 April) said that the RNLI provided cover at 242 beaches across Britain and Channel Islands.
One of the advantages of using the charity’s services was the extra support available to lifeguards including counselling for traumatic incidents.
The idea of approaching the RNLI to provide lifeguard services was suggested more than a year ago as the council considered reducing the lifeguard service at less busy beaches to try to save money.
But after the local elections last May, the new Labour administration allocated an extra £93,000 to fund 15 more lifeguards to protect beachgoers.
Green councillor Raphael Hill said that talks with the RNLI suggested that an in-house operation would not be financially possible, adding that the previous Green administration had suggested the idea last year.
Councillor Hill said: “I understand there is a need to protect things and keep them in-house and, in the context of austerity, both of us, Labour and Green, want to have in-house lifeguard services.
“Financially speaking, it is not possible with the current constraints. It’s a concern for everyone that, without support like outside organisations, having as many lifeguards as we have may not be possible.”
Labour councillor John Hewitt asked for assurances that if the RNLI took on the service, it would be notified of those who had signed up for summer work as lifeguards. The answer was yes.
Conservative councillor Carol Theobald asked for clarification about tasks that RNLI lifeguards would not take on such as enforcing by-laws, tackling anti-social behaviour and reuniting lost children with their families.
She was told that the loss of by-law enforcement would be a “dis-benefit” of having the RNLI take on the service but the lifeguards would monitor sea conditions, assess risks and receive extensive training.
Labour councillor Alan Robins, who chairs the committee, said: “I would sooner try to defend spending too much money on the lifeguards than try to explain why someone has drowned or got into trouble because we didn’t have lifeguards.”
At Brighton Town Hall, the committee unanimously agreed to authorise senior officials to conclude talks with the RNLI or continue running the service in-house if talks with the charity were unsuccessful.
We need a council tax rebate if a charity is going to be doing it.
Why? That’s silly. It’d cost more in administration to rebate such a small contribution, it’s less than 3p a week. And you’re always advocating for intelligent spending. This wouldn’t be intelligent.
The RNLI would be paid for providing the service. As per the report to the committee.
https://democracy.brighton-hove.gov.uk/documents/s198125/Seasonal%20Beach%20Lifeguard%20Report.html?CT=2
Giving it to RNLI also enables them access to funding that BHCC would not be allowed to access; there’s additional benefit there.
I wonder if the RNLI can fill in potholes or clear gullies as well ? Now that would be a good result!
Maybe they could empty the bins as well
Use some of those pebbles to fill them in!
Irrespective of who runs the service, it needs to be “on station” in more locations from the Marina to Millionaires Row and be available into early evening, when people go to the beach after School and Work.
That is a very good point about early evenings. Have some really nice memories of hanging out at the beach after a day. I love Brighton in summer. One of the best places to be.
So, when the Greens think about doing this, it’s terrible and unforgivable, but when Labour propose it, suddenly it’s a great idea. Hmm …