Two new blocks of temporary homes for homeless people are set to open in Brighton after councillors agreed to convert former council offices and sheltered housing.
Brighton and Hove City Council currently relies on private landlords to house homeless families and vulnerable people waiting for longer term housing, often placing them in complexes such as Windsor Court and Percival Terrace, where housing standards and high rents have been roundly criticised by campaigners.
By using the former Oxford Street offices and Stonehouse Court in Down Terrace, the council will have more control over the accommodation, and will also charge rents – and these will be pegged at affordable levels.
The conversion of the two sites was unanimously agreed at the council’s housing committee meeting last night, where it was also revealed that the council is planning on opening a hostel for older disabled rough sleepers, although this is currently in the early planning stages.
The decision was praised by campaigner Daniel Harris, founder of the Emergency and Temporary Housing Residents Action Group (ETHRAG). He said: “Not only are standards going to go up, but there will be money in the reserves which will help to build more council houses for people who need them.
“I praise Clare Moonan and the Labour party for talking and listening to activists on the ground.
“What we would like to see is more in house emergency accommodation, not just temporary accommodation, and more properties adjusted for people with disabilities.”
Speaking at the meeting, Green councillor David Gibson said: “We are producing our own temporary accommodation which not only saves costs but is providing income streams as well. And the properties are going to let at social rents which means the people living there can get jobs and have a bit of extra income.”
Labour’s Clare Moonan, lead councillor for homelessness, said she liked another option for Oxford Street to convert it into a hostel for older rough sleepers, but appreciated that its proximity to the Level and the associated drug dealing there could be problematic for those seeking to break with bad habits.
She said: “I was drawn to the option which would be housing rough sleepers, because there is a real need for move on accommodation, which this would be ideal for.
“I appreciate this maybe wasn’t the ideal location.”
A council officer replied: “We have one option where an architect has just produced this afternoon a feasibility report and it’s my belief that it’s a better use of funding.”
Temporary accommodation is short term housing for people who the council has a duty to house, including families and vulnerable people.
The council already runs its own hostels for very short term emergency accommodation used for people while they wait for officers to assess if they have a duty to house them.
However, the large and rising demand for places there means that it also uses the private sector for this, and more hostels are also needed.
The Oxford Street housing offices closed in late 2014, and have been empty ever since. It will now be converted into 12 studios and flats.
Stonehouse Court on Down Terrace will be converted from 20 studio flats into 10 two-bedroom family houses for temporary accommmodation. It’s possible these could be used as long term social housing in the future.
Final going to do Something taken long enough!
At last something is going to be done. Windsor court is a disgrace and should be closed down. Putting families with babies and young children there is putting them at risk
BHCC has been paying exorbitant sums to unscrupulous private landlords for revolting, unsupervised, slum ‘temporary emergency’ accommodation for far too long. Some very cosy relationships between BHCC officers and the landlords. BHCC housing is also complicit in ‘placing’ people with serious mental health disorders abandoned by Sussex partnership mental health trust in these dreadful places. Vulnerable people dumped in dives with no care living with drug abusers. Mark Packham died because of this. He was just 30. Now BHCC also needs to intervene with all the other councils who send their homeless to these revolting hostels
I think as long as these people get Housing benefit until they get on their feet will be able to live here. The council’s so called “affordable rent” is not that affordable. There are three of us in our home, two working and we are just afloat. When the council tax rises this is where we will suffer and hopefully these homeless won’t. The council should have different rents for the amount of money that is earned by working and sitting on your backsides raking in benefits! I am disabled and all my money goes on bills thanks to our ” low rent and discounted council tax” thats not much either. But a handshake for getting people off the streeets ??????????
Spot on and time for a legal action against Sussex Partnership Trust .,
The location will absolutely mean carnage of deaths and dealing. Until the mental health issue is addressed and a decision made on creating a zero tolerance approach to drug misuse, the cycle will continue.
Legal action against Sussex partnership ought to have been taken many years ago
Their constant systematic failings are an absolute disgrace .The people who needed care help and good treatment were treated abhorrently in the majority of cases
many of whom took their lives . I speak from my own personal experiences whilst detained at Millview in a number of occasions.. I had been traumatised but instead of asking me what happened to lead me to be detained I was drugged with anti psychotic medication ( forcibly at times)
I was so traumatised I was unable to voice it .. and being given medication that can bring about depression suicidal thoughts etc
I was being “ mistreated “
Brilliant idea.
Lets hope this does something to help all those poor people sleeping in the streets – I’ve got a feeling, though, that many of these almost seem to enjoy the life, propped up outside various supermarkets, living in social “hippy” communes, begging, living with their many pets, and many well lubricated so that they will not be accepted into any shelters that have no-alcohol policies.
A couple of things bother me about this story. How do we find ourselves in a situation where there is such a thing as a disabled rough sleeper? Why was no alternative use found for the Oxford Street housing offices in 2015 and 2016? I’m also interested to know what the council deems to be an affordable level of rent?
Somebody with half a brain needs to discern who has a solely housing issue compared to those who have mental/drug and alcohol issues…just putting people into hostels without total commitment to address other issues is just pouring sand through a sieve…council know perfectly well Smile to live was a potentially susscessfyl principle, council put people in there who had chronic mental health/addiction issues….there needs to be a rethink on models…
I agree
An excellent start. So long as people in these schemes are supported properly with their social and this ‘temporary’ accommodation really is temporary, this will be a very good start.
Mid-way between London Road and the Level: ideal!
can I put my name down for one as I been homeless for over year and half now
Just make it illegal to sleep on the streets,then something will have to occur, councils responsibility to house people!