• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
29 September, 2023
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Hove

‘We don’t want it’ – residents react to Portland Road cycle lane suggestion

by Jo Wadsworth
Wednesday 21 Jul, 2021 at 2:03PM
A A
8
Cyclist cut up by white van breaks both elbows


People living around Portland Road are generally not in favour of relocating the Old Shoreham Road cycle lane to their doorstep.

The Labour group says it is planning to vote to scrap the temporary lane on the Old Shoreham Road at today’s special environment, transport and sustainability committee, and ask officers to look into relocating it, with its two suggestions being Portland Road or New Church Road.

Portland Road was one of the options considered by Mott McDonald last year when it looked at how to improve the city’s cycling facilities as part of its covid response.

However, it was not chosen because it would require removing parking on both sides of the road, which would have affected loading for shops.

New Church Road was also not chosen because of the need for bigger changes to the layout to avoid conflict with bus stops, with a need for floating bus stops raised.

Brighton and Hove News asked members of the Portland Road residents Facebook group what they thought – and of the dozens who replied, most thought the lane should go elsewhere.

Sarah Tullet said: “New Church Road would be a better option than Portland Road, because there are less shops and businesses that would be affected by the loss of parking.

“A loss spaces along that road would have a greater impact on those that live here.”

Debby Brake simply said: “We don’t want it.”

Alpa Patel said: “Definitely neither. Unless they introduce one way traffic down each road.

“What’s wrong with the one on the seafront? And to be fair I’m completely happy with the one on Old Shoreham Road.”

Beverley Weaver said: “With the lack of parking for businesses and loading bays, it’s going to cause horror.

“There’s already issues with cars and vans parking on corners, blocking views as it is. It would be a shame for the loss of trade for businesses.”

Richard Cowle said: “Neither of those roads are suitable. B&H was built with relatively narrow roads.

“Cycle paths are just not possible in most locations, without huge, structural change.”

However, there were some people in favour of a cycle lane in Portland Road.

Tony Low said: “I think it’ll be great along Portland Road. I cycle along there everyday and the double parking people walking out and the car doors opening is so dangerous I have around five near accidents every time I ride along.”

Nick Sayers said: “It’d be slightly beneficial on Portland Road, but that’s already an OK road to cycle along.

“Where it’s *needed* is Old Shoreham Road, which was a dangerous, dirty, unpleasant place for anyone not inside a car before. Such a wasted opportunity.”

And one New Church Road residents were not keen on it coming to their road either.

Anna O’Brien said: “I drive the length of New Church Road most days and rarely have a journey without someone (or multiple people) pulling out in front of me from one of the roads that join it.

“I’m relatively protected in my metal box – and know to anticipate it – but I’d worry about the impact on cyclists.”

New Church Road is about 300m north of Kingsway, on which there is already a cycle lane and plans to improve it in the near future are expected to be approved this afternoon.

Portland Road is between 300m and 700m south of Old Shoreham Road – but the trainline running between them means accessing one from the other can involve a detour of more than a mile.

ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 8

  1. Nathan Adler says:
    2 years ago

    Blimey Jo you send tweets to Labour berating their decision, you wrote an article 2 days a ago which was almost word for word what Chris Williams of Bricycles had sent Labour councilors and now this fluff piece of 5 minute journalism where you hand selected a few comments that supported your argument on facebook. Always though B&H news was pretty impartial – thankfully we have Frank. This is really underhanded behaviour.

    Reply
  2. Rachel says:
    2 years ago

    How much more money is going to be wasted on unwanted, dangerous cycle lanes? How about the council dealing with the real issues of dangerous, broken pavements, dog mess and the unsightly weeds everywhere. I’m sick of this inept council letting our city become a filthy dump.

    Reply
  3. Christopher Hawtree says:
    2 years ago

    There are currently two Petitions to the Council – one by cllr Robert Nemeth and one by myself – about Portland Road. Together, these show that the Road has many problems, and so it is not simply the case of a cycle land solving them: the Road needs a thorough review, work upon which cllr Nemeth has been engaged with Council officials. As I said with many residents while taking around my Petition about the perilous zebra, it has always seemed to me that New Church Road is far better for cyclists than Portland Road. Something overlooked in all this is that cyclists learn their own routes. For example, I cycle along New Church Road, into Pembroke Crescent and over Sackville Road, through Stirling Place and up Connaught Terrace to reach Blatchington Road. That’s enough geekishness for now!

    Reply
  4. Hove Guy says:
    2 years ago

    Since when has the council been concerned about loading for shops being affected by the removal of parking? What a pity they did not consider this when they removed parking around the Prince Albert Street area, resulting in deliveries to shops having to take place far away from where they are located. What a load of hypocrites!

    Reply
  5. Some Guy says:
    2 years ago

    The “bagsies not it” reaction from other potential sites is kind of depressing.

    Reply
  6. Billy Short says:
    2 years ago

    I cycle along Portland road all the time and, apart from access to my local shops there, I choose this route because it’s wide and surprisingly flat.
    It’s a flat and straight road all the way from Portslade station to the eastern end where, if heading on into the city centre, you can either drop down to Blatchington Road or carry on along Clarendon Villas and then Eaton Villas.

    And, here’s the thing, this route feels perfectly safe to me without the need for a cycle lane.
    Most cyclists will also only be on this road for one section, before they divert towards their intended destination.

    Bespoke cycle lanes through fields or open land are fantastic. But squeezing a lane into a busy urban road by shifting bus stops and parked cars into the middle of the road is just illogical in terms of efficient use of limited space, and it’s actually worse for other road users be they pedestrians, shop owners, residents, bus users, delivery vehicles or private motorists.

    We have already seen that imposing cycle lanes in the wrong area does nothing to increase ‘active travel’.
    I’d be using my own bike a lot more if I could lock it up safely to find it still there when I got back from my shop or pub visit. In this city, bike lanes come secondary to that constant theft issue.

    It seems to me we also need to distinguish between those cyclists on local journeys, and leisure cyclists, and those who are trying to commute to work across the city by bicycle. All groups are equally important but have different needs and choose different routes.
    It was also dumb, as with the Old Shoreham road route, to allocate 50 percent of the road space to 2 percent of the users just because the fanatical cycle lobbying groups campaigned for that.

    So this whole policy needs a rethink. We need all forms of transport to run efficiently, with shared/public transport having the priority. If cars are travelling too fast along Portland road then install more speed bumps and speed cameras.
    If, in truth, you don’t want private cars using this road, then ban cars.

    But above all, if you are taking something away, then make sure when spending the taxpayers’ money you are actually giving back something that is better.

    Reply
  7. bix says:
    2 years ago

    Make it a 20mph liminit on this road, bring in proper parking enforcement and paint a cycle lane on it. Job done. It is the easiest route and connects brighton (e.g. seven dials or clocktower via new north road) up beautifully with portslade. It would be prudent to educate drivers not to open their car doors without checking for cyclst, unless you want that cycle lane in the middle of the lane

    Reply
    • Stew says:
      2 years ago

      Paint a cycle lane down the middle and make the North pavement 1m less wide if you must but really no one wants it and everyone including cyclists would just prefer the council spent some money retarmacing the city’s awful roads. The council spent millions on vally gardens which is an improvement. The vast majority of people use that cycle lane however you still get morons going down the road and not the cycle lanes because the stretch at the level is to bumpy to cycle on, so they are kind of a vanity project in all seriousness.

      If you want people out of cars the easiest solution is park and ride, repairing the roads and bus lanes. We live in a city built on several large valleys, cycling is not the answer to mass transit here for obvious reasons. A tram or trolley bus would be a better idea

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Stew Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

Brazen bike thief steals £3.5k ebike as witnesses take pictures

Electric charging spots to be removed because they would block hearses

£1k a month garden cabin rental provokes outrage

Council books further £2.5m loss on Brighton i360 debt

Council faces £70m budget gap

Top music awards go to Bjork, Wet Leg and … a Brighton record shop

‘We don’t want it’ – residents react to Portland Road cycle lane suggestion

Football match-day guest parking permits look likely to be scrapped

Prankster artists swap snaps of Brighton tourist traps for housing estates

Is this your giant husky?

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
Helen McCookerybook & James McCallum to bring The Chefs to Woodingdean

Helen McCookerybook & James McCallum to bring The Chefs to Woodingdean

28 September 2023
It’s certainly not the ‘End Of World’ for PiL

It’s certainly not the ‘End Of World’ for PiL

28 September 2023
‘Run Like Hell’ it’s Peter And The Test Tube Babies

‘Run Like Hell’ it’s Peter And The Test Tube Babies

27 September 2023
Green Door Store’s ‘2 3 4 Fest’ a resounding success! (Part Two)

Green Door Store’s ‘2 3 4 Fest’ a resounding success! (Part Two)

27 September 2023
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket

Sussex scent victory after a dominant day at Hove

by Will Symons
28 September 2023
0

Sussex - 202 and 505-7 (declared) Gloucestershire - 195 and 113-5 Sussex have victory in their sights after a commanding...

Manager of Brighton and Hove Albion’s women team dismissed after allegations

Albion ease out of Carabao Cup with Europa and Premier League taking precedence

by Tim Hodges
27 September 2023
0

Brighton and Hove Albion are out of the Carabao League cup after a goal from Nicholas Jackson settled the tie....

Carabao Cup Round 3 – Chelsea v Brighton and Hove Albion

Carabao Cup Round 3 – Chelsea v Brighton and Hove Albion

by Tim Hodges
27 September 2023
0

Brighton and Hove Albion go to Stamford Bridge for their first League Cup game of the season. Chelsea entered the...

Sussex come up short against Middlesex in County Championship

Sussex bat their way into a strong position on day two

by Will Symons
27 September 2023
0

Sussex 202 and 256-3 Gloucestershire 195 Classy fifties from Tom Clark, Ali Orr and James Coles put Sussex in a...

Load More
July 2021
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jun   Aug »
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.