Three asylum-seekers have been found guilty today (Thursday 23 April) of raping a woman on Brighton beach.
All three men denied the charges, with two saying that the woman consented and the other saying that he filmed what happened not as an accessory but to try to stop his friends.
They started having sex with a drunk woman who had become separated from her friends just minutes after “alighting” on her, a jury was told.
The jury was shown security camera pictures of the woman staggering out of Burger King on Brighton seafront just before 5.40am on Saturday 4 October last year.
Moments later, two of the men were filmed by another camera as they walked with her on the other side of the A259 King’s Road before turning down a ramp to the lower promenade.
And at 5.46am the third defendant was shown joining the other two behind the Brighton Beach Patrol hut where the pair had sex with the woman.
The third man, Karin Al-Danasurt, filmed Abdulla Ahmadi and Ibrahim Alshafe as they had sex with the woman.
Hanna Llewellyn-Waters, prosecuting, told Hove Crown Court that Al-Danasurt said to the police in his interview that the woman was drunk to the point that she could not stand on her own.
Miss Llewellyn-Waters said that there was no CCTV (closed-circuit television) camera coverage of the area behind the sea side of the Beach Patrol hut.
But the footage, filmed by Al-Danasurt on his phone, showed Alshafe “smiling and sticking his tongue out” during the attack. Ahmadi appeared to be trying to hide his face.
Alshafe, 25, and Al-Danasurt, 20, both Egyptian nationals, and Ahmadi, 26, an Iranian national, each denied rape.
The three short videos that he filmed were shown to the jury yesterday (Tuesday 17 March).
Miss Llewellyn-Waters told the jury: “As the camera angle changes, Ahmadi covers his face with his hand and he, you may think, may be trying to shift his head so he is not seen on camera.
“Shortly after that, as she (the complainant) is motionless, Mr Alshafe lifts his head up to face the camera and poses for it, smiling and sticking his tongue out.”
When the alleged offences took place, all three defendants knew each other and were living at the Cisswood House Hotel, in Lower Beeding, near Horsham. The hotel was approved by the Home Office for housing asylum-seekers, the jury was told.
Alshafe and Ahmadi both arrived in Britain on a small boat on Thursday 19 June last year, three months before the alleged rapes. Al-Danasurt entered the country on Friday 11 October 2024, the court was told.
Ahmadi left the hotel the day after the alleged rapes and moved to an address in Crewe, Cheshire, where he was arrested on Sunday 12 October, the court was told.
The move had not been approved by the Home Office and Ahmadi had been marked as “absconding, self-departing” from the Cisswood House Hotel.
On Monday 13 October, Alshafe and Al-Danasurt were arrested after police were notified that they had returned to the Cisswood House Hotel.
DNA samples were taken from all three defendants – and DNA from both Alshafe and Ahmadi matched samples taken from the complainant’s body during a forensic medical examination, jurors were told.
Forensic evidence related to Al-Danasurt was inconclusive, Miss Llewellyn-Waters said.
Jurors were told that the woman, who is in her thirties, had been on a night out in Brighton with friends but became separated from them. Her identity is protected by law.
Judge Christine Henson told the jury before they retired to beware of stereotyping and said that this included not judging “lifestyle choices” such as having voluntarily been drinking alcohol – as the complainant had in this case.
The judge warned them not to “fall into the trap” of thinking someone is “less worthy of belief” if they had drunk alcohol or, in some cases, taken illegal drugs.
She added: “It is important not to assume that that means they were looking for or willing to have sex.”
After the verdicts, the judge thanked the jury who sat for almost six weeks. The five men and seven women took 16 hours and 28 minutes to reach their verdicts, having retired on Monday (20 April).
Al-Danasurt had faced a count of “sharing intimate films” without the complainant’s consent.
But the jury were told today that they did not need to reach a verdict on the charge because it had been established that the offence could be tried only in a magistrates’ court.
Ahmadi and Alshafe were of previous good character, the trial was told. But after the verdicts had been delivered, Miss Llewellyn-Waters told jurors that Al-Danasurt had a caution for criminal damage at the Lower Beeding hotel.
She said that inquiries were taking place at a senior level to find out whether he had any relevant convictions abroad. A pre-trial hearing was told that he had been convicted of murder in Egypt.
Miss Llewellyn-Waters also said: “All three have been refused their asylum applications. They are all engaged in appealing those decisions.
“It is not a foregone conclusion that they will be deported to their country of origin following these convictions.”
The three men are due to be sentenced on Wednesday 15 July. All three were remanded in custody.







Great result
Great news
What vile individuals. Thankfully justice looks like it will be served. Thoughts with the victim and all she has had to endure.
That poor woman. What a horrific attack. I really hope she is being loved and supported through this nightmare. I truly hope being deported is what happens-we need them as far away from here as possible.
15 years each and deport them straight after there sentence completed.
It’s not a foregone conclusion, but I think it’s pretty much certain they’ll be sent back. Poor woman…even with justice being served doesn’t magically make everything better.
Lets wait n see what our Liberal minded Justice system sentences them to, I’m not optimistic considering all the leniency shown to offenders over the last few years.
They didn’t “have sex” with her. They raped her
They should be banned from entering the UK or Europe forever
Here’s the **most accurate, sourced explanation** of anything related to “Benjamin” in *Brighton & Hove News* and migrants.
—
## 🧾 Key point first (important)
There is **no verified public figure or official named “Benjamin”** (e.g. councillor, MP, spokesperson) who has made a formal statement about migrants in Brighton.
What you *are seeing* online comes from:
➡️ **comment sections under Brighton & Hove News articles**, not official policy or leadership statements.
—
## 🗨️ What “Benjamin” actually said
From Brighton & Hove News comment sections (summarised from multiple articles):
### 1. On blaming migrants for local problems
* He pushed back against claims migrants cause housing issues:
> Blaming a small number of asylum seekers for a citywide housing crisis is misleading
* He argued housing problems are due to:
* rent costs
* evictions
* housing supply
👉 This appears under reporting about asylum seekers in hotels ([Brighton and Hove News][1])
—
### 2. On asylum funding
* He pointed out a factual distinction:
* asylum accommodation is **funded by the UK Home Office**
* not controlled by the local council
👉 Again correcting claims migrants are draining local budgets ([Brighton and Hove News][1])
—
### 3. On immigration debate tone
* He criticised how people discuss immigration:
* said people rely on labels like “lefty liberal” instead of policy discussion
👉 Seen in debates around protests and immigration tensions ([Brighton and Hove News][2])
—
### 4. On wider social issues (pattern of views)
* In other discussions (not migration-specific), he:
* argues against “divisive narratives”
* supports evidence-based debate over emotional claims ([Brighton and Hove News][3])
—
## ⚠️ What this means (important context)
* This “Benjamin” is:
* **not a confirmed public official**
* most likely a **regular commenter or local resident**
* His views:
* lean toward **pro-migrant / anti-blame narrative**
* focus on **structural causes (housing, policy)** rather than immigration itself
—
## 📰 Bigger picture in Brighton
* Brighton council generally positions itself as:
* a **“city of sanctuary”** supporting migrants ([Brighton and Hove News][3])
* The city **continues to house asylum seekers**, including in hotels ([Brighton and Hove News][1])
* But there is:
* strong public disagreement
* heated debate (especially after serious crimes like the beach case)
—
## ✔️ Bottom line
* “Benjamin” is **not an official spokesperson**
* His comments:
* defend migrants from blame
* challenge common claims about housing and costs
* They reflect **one side of a wider, very divided local debate**
—
If you want, I can:
* Identify **actual councillors’ official statements**
* Break down **arguments for vs against migrants in Brighton**
* Or find **social media figures named Benjamin (if you saw this elsewhere)**
[1]: https://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2025/08/21/council-wont-seek-to-end-use-of-asylum-seeker-hotels-in-brighton-and-hove/?utm_source=chatgpt.com “Council won’t seek to end use of asylum seeker hotels in …”
[2]: https://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2025/08/22/st-georges-flags-stay-for-now-as-contractors-removing-them-report-abuse/?utm_source=chatgpt.com “St George’s flags stay for now as contractors removing them report abuse”
[3]: https://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2025/05/15/brighton-and-hove-is-a-city-of-friends-says-council-leader/?utm_source=chatgpt.com “Brighton and Hove is a city of friends, says council leader”