• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
19 June, 2025
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Brighton

Brighton and Hove hospital trust ends fight over £325k fine

by Frank le Duc
Wednesday 27 Jun, 2012 at 6:51PM
A A
3

The hospital trust for Brighton and Hove has paid a “staggering” £260,000 fine to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust had until 5pm on Monday (25 June) to appeal or pay the fine.

The amount would have been £325,000 if it had missed the deadline and initially the ICO had indicated that it would be £375,000.

The ICO fined the trust, which runs the Royal Sussex County Hospital, for a breach of the Data Protection Act.

The breach was the result of a contractor stealing computer hard drives from the trust which he was supposed to destroy.

Instead of destroying them all, he sold some on eBay, the internet auction site in the autumn of 2010.

The hard drives contained sensitive personal data about tens of thousands of patients and staff – including details of patients being treated for HIV and sexual infections.

A spokesman for the ICO said: “We are pleased that Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust has now accepted the ICO’s ruling in paying the monetary penalty early in order to receive a 20 per cent discount.”

The trust’s interim chief executive Chris Adcock said: “We have made repeated attempts over the past six months, most recently last week, to reach a settlement that recognised that errors were made but no harm arose, all of which have been rejected by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

“The fine is a staggering amount of money given that there was no loss of data, we informed the ICO at the time, co-operated throughout with them, the police and Crown Prosecution Service and recovered everything.

“There is, however, nothing more odious than one public body having a public argument with another at the taxpayer’s expense.

“We are not prepared to incur further costs and are therefore paying the ICO £260,000.”

Duncan Selbie, who was chief executive when the theft occurred, said before he left the trust for a new job that he would rather have spent the money on treating patients.

While data had been at risk, he said, no actual harm was done.

In contrast, the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority will pay out a maximum of £11,000 to someone who loses a loved one as the result of violent crime.

Simon Kirby, the MP for Brighton Kemptown, said: “While I am reluctant to comment on quasi judicial processes I have written to the Information Commissioner’s Office raising concerns about the severity of the punishment.“I am naturally keen to avoid patients again being the innocent victims.”

 

ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 3

  1. Valerie Paynter, says:
    13 years ago

    What happened to the thieving contractor? What punishment there? Any? A charge from the police even? As one of the many thousands of patients almost certainly affected by that theft, I would like to know.

    Perhaps compensation from the contractor is in order – to the tune of a few hundred thousand Pounds.

    Reply
  2. Clive Howe says:
    13 years ago

    The thieving contractor got away scott free. Did you really expect the police to investigate a crime?

    As for the ICO they wouldn’t have touched him although he allegedly committed a criminal offence (Section 55 of the Data Protection Act). Why shoul dthey go after him or a provate body they only prosecute public bodies, i.e. the tax payer.

    Reply
  3. Pingback: KLF Revisited* « 2040 information law blog

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

Brighton man jailed for years of abusing girls starting when he was just 10

Brighton hotel owner owes council almost £1m

Meeting called to discuss school’s academy plans

New Hove seafront cycle lane plans unveiled

Council joint venture buys land for hundreds of new homes

Indian restaurant owner rebuffed again by licensing panel

Gas main damaged during Spiegelgarden take-down

Brighton and Hove hospital trust ends fight over £325k fine

Benefits changes could push thousands into poverty, councillors fear

Late-licence refusal amounts to discrimination, says business owner

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
Goth-Pop act Vision Video highlight ‘Modern Horror’

Goth-Pop act Vision Video highlight ‘Modern Horror’

17 June 2025
Oh! Darling – in Brighton for one night only

Oh! Darling – in Brighton for one night only

17 June 2025
The Mullet Monster Mafia play first ever Brighton gig!

The Mullet Monster Mafia play first ever Brighton gig!

16 June 2025
Top Left Club staying sick as ever!

Top Left Club staying sick as ever!

15 June 2025
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Brighton and Hove Albion sign Italy international

Brighton and Hove Albion sign Italy international

by Frank le Duc
17 June 2025
0

Brighton and Hove Albion have signed a 21-year-old Italy international to add to the Seagulls’ defensive options. Diego Coppola has...

Sussex Sharks open T20 Blast with a win

Sussex Sharks stay top of their group with T20 triumph at Glamorgan

by Blake Bint - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
14 June 2025
0

Glamorgan 172 (18.5 overs) Sussex 199-7 (20 overs) Sussex won by 27 runs. Sussex 4 points, Glamorgan 0 points. Sussex...

Sussex Sharks open T20 Blast with a win

Rain saves Sussex Sharks in T20 against Essex at Hove

by Adrian Colley
13 June 2025
0

Sussex 23-3 (3.1 overs) Essex 177-4 (17 overs) No result Essex’s hopes of claiming their first win of the season...

Brighton and Hove Albion announce Kostoulas signing

Brighton and Hove Albion announce Kostoulas signing

by Frank le Duc
12 June 2025
0

Brighton and Hove Albion have announced the signing of 18-year-old striker Charalampos Kostoulas from Greek champions Olympiacos on a five-year...

Load More
June 2012
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« May   Jul »

RSS From Sussex News

  • Hospital trust agrees six-figure payout after seven-year battle over traumatic birth 17 June 2025
  • CPS drops rape case against Sussex Police officer 17 June 2025
  • Female teacher sexually abused schoolgirl 16 June 2025
  • Bungalow owner aims to build nine homes on village plot 16 June 2025
  • Boy, 12, taken to hospital after hit and run 16 June 2025
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News