• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
13 September, 2026
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Brighton

Brighton and Hove hospital trust ends fight over £325k fine

by Frank le Duc
Wednesday 27 Jun, 2012 at 6:51PM
A A
3

The hospital trust for Brighton and Hove has paid a “staggering” £260,000 fine to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust had until 5pm on Monday (25 June) to appeal or pay the fine.

The amount would have been £325,000 if it had missed the deadline and initially the ICO had indicated that it would be £375,000.

The ICO fined the trust, which runs the Royal Sussex County Hospital, for a breach of the Data Protection Act.

The breach was the result of a contractor stealing computer hard drives from the trust which he was supposed to destroy.

Instead of destroying them all, he sold some on eBay, the internet auction site in the autumn of 2010.

The hard drives contained sensitive personal data about tens of thousands of patients and staff – including details of patients being treated for HIV and sexual infections.

A spokesman for the ICO said: “We are pleased that Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust has now accepted the ICO’s ruling in paying the monetary penalty early in order to receive a 20 per cent discount.”

The trust’s interim chief executive Chris Adcock said: “We have made repeated attempts over the past six months, most recently last week, to reach a settlement that recognised that errors were made but no harm arose, all of which have been rejected by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

“The fine is a staggering amount of money given that there was no loss of data, we informed the ICO at the time, co-operated throughout with them, the police and Crown Prosecution Service and recovered everything.

“There is, however, nothing more odious than one public body having a public argument with another at the taxpayer’s expense.

“We are not prepared to incur further costs and are therefore paying the ICO £260,000.”

Duncan Selbie, who was chief executive when the theft occurred, said before he left the trust for a new job that he would rather have spent the money on treating patients.

While data had been at risk, he said, no actual harm was done.

In contrast, the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority will pay out a maximum of £11,000 to someone who loses a loved one as the result of violent crime.

Simon Kirby, the MP for Brighton Kemptown, said: “While I am reluctant to comment on quasi judicial processes I have written to the Information Commissioner’s Office raising concerns about the severity of the punishment.“I am naturally keen to avoid patients again being the innocent victims.”

 

Support quality, independent, local journalism that matters. Donate here.
ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 3

  1. Valerie Paynter, says:
    14 years ago

    What happened to the thieving contractor? What punishment there? Any? A charge from the police even? As one of the many thousands of patients almost certainly affected by that theft, I would like to know.

    Perhaps compensation from the contractor is in order – to the tune of a few hundred thousand Pounds.

    Reply
  2. Clive Howe says:
    14 years ago

    The thieving contractor got away scott free. Did you really expect the police to investigate a crime?

    As for the ICO they wouldn’t have touched him although he allegedly committed a criminal offence (Section 55 of the Data Protection Act). Why shoul dthey go after him or a provate body they only prosecute public bodies, i.e. the tax payer.

    Reply
  3. Pingback: KLF Revisited* « 2040 information law blog

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

Marina proposes dumping dredgings at Newhaven

Clients of troubled property company told no money left in bank for them

Council challenged over red route inconsistencies

Key decision due on return of the Brighton Wheel

Car chase suspect from Hove charged with driving and drugs offences

Power tussle leaves the public in the dark

Brighton and Hove hospital trust ends fight over £325k fine

Officials recommend closing day centre despite objections

Man faces court over homophobic abuse at football match

Senior councillors back £500k study to boost bus use

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
China Crisis play first Brighton gig in decades

China Crisis play first Brighton gig in decades

12 September 2026
Impressive new music night

Impressive new music night

11 September 2026
Taste Film Launch Party, Harbour Hotel Brighton, 9th September 2026

Taste Film Delivers on Flavour and Entertainment

10 September 2026
The Levellers knock it out of the Park

The Levellers knock it out of the Park

10 September 2026
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Brighton and Hove Albion host Aston Villa in Premier League opener

Brighton and Hove Albion boss demands high standards at Coventry

by PA sport staff
12 September 2026
0

Fabian Hürzeler has challenged his Brighton and Hove Albion players to reach their “highest standards” to prevent Coventry City claiming...

Residents upset by removal of match day guest parking permits

Man faces court over homophobic abuse at football match

by Frank le Duc
12 September 2026
2

A man faces court charged with homophobic abuse at a football match in Brighton. Alexander Bishop, 55, from Gloucestershire, was...

Brighton and Hove Albion boss hopes for more time with Ayari

Brighton and Hove Albion boss hopes for more time with Ayari

by PA sport staff
12 September 2026
0

As Yasin Ayari prepares to face Coventry City, having spent a loan spell with the Sky Blues in the Championship,...

Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex stay fourth after draw with Surrey at Hove

by Bruce Talbot - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
11 September 2026
0

Sussex 393 (104 overs) and 167-3 (65 overs) Surrey 321 (104.4 overs) Sussex (14 points) drew with Surrey (13 points)...

Load More
June 2012
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« May   Jul »

RSS From Sussex News

  • Southern Water boss appears in court charged with fraud 11 September 2026
  • Driver jailed over death of motorcyclist in crash 10 September 2026
  • MP complains about homeless people from Brighton and Hove being dumped in Eastbourne 8 September 2026
  • Shake up of Sussex councils put on hold 7 September 2026
  • Primary school teacher jailed for child sex offences 7 September 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News