• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
1 May, 2026
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Brighton

Moves to relocate station taxi rank move step closer

by Jo Wadsworth
Tuesday 27 Jun, 2017 at 5:28PM
A A
8
Brighton Station neighbours ask council to tackle disturbance from ‘unofficial taxi rank’

Surrey Street

Plans to move the taxi rank to the rear of Brighton Station – and stop taxis queueing outside people’s homes – are moving forward now the station owners have requested a meeting with the city council.

Surrey Street

Residents of Surrey Street have suffered years of “absolute blight” from noise and congestion from queueing taxi drivers after the revamp of the roads around the station.

A petition signed by 83 people living there calling for double red lines and increased CCTV coverage to stop queuing there was considered by Brighton and Hove City Council’s environment and transport committee.

But after councillors heard that Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR), which owns the land, had recently requested a meeting to discuss moving the rank – after five years of resistance to the idea – they agreed to wait until these negotiations had finished as the move would solve the Surrey Street issues.

The petition, which was first presented to full council in March, said: “We the undersigned require Brighton & Hove City Council address congestion by taxi traffic on Surrey Street and surround roads.

“We request that these streets are covered by Double Red Lines, with increased CCTV coverage to assist enforcement.

“A solution is required to alleviate the following concerns: air pollution, noise pollution, antisocial behaviour, lack of access for local residents to the limited loading bays available on Surrey Street, problems caused by taxi related congestion for emergency services and other public transport, all caused by static and slow moving traffic, created by the use of Surrey Street and Upper Gloucester Road as unofficial taxi ranks.”

Committee chair Gill Mitchell said: “Officers have looked at a range of traffic options but believe the best solution is to move the taxi rank to the rear of the station.

“GTR are the landowners and very, very recently they have contacted the council requested another meeting.”

Green councillor Pete West spoke of the work his colleague Lizzie Deane, who represents the area, has done. He said: “She will be able to talk of the absolute blight that has been placed on their lives. We are grateful for the interest the chair has shown in the issue.

“But there has been a lack of progress over the years it really needs a stronger light to be shone upon it.

“Govia has been strongly resistant to this idea and I’m glad that they are now considering a plan that we were asking for five years ago. I would like a stronger response here today.”

Cllr Mitchell countered: “These problems followed the Station Gateway scheme, where the taxi rank should have been moved. We are now having to deal with the mess it’s created.

“I would ask that our officers rather than busying themselves with interim reports, carry on negotiating with landowners and taxi companies to get a result.”

The Station Gateway scheme, which widened the pavement in Surrey Street, was completed in 2015. While work took place, the taxi rank moved temporarily to Terminus Road, and after the work was completed, a plan to make this its permanent home was briefly considered.

Last autumn, a draft plan to put it at the back of the station was shown to taxi companies – but GTR then said it had no plans to move the rank.

Support quality, independent, local journalism that matters. Donate here.
ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 8

  1. Benny says:
    9 years ago

    If only the council would replace its entire traffic department with people who have a clue, Brighton would be a much better and pleasant place – and not be wasting fortunes on cameras, while we’re at it.

    Reply
    • Sam says:
      9 years ago

      Wish there were more people like you!

      Reply
  2. Roger Kirk says:
    9 years ago

    Sounds to me like it’s actually Govia Thameslink who are the problem here, not the transport department.

    Worth noting that GTR are the same company who run Southern Rail. So not surprising they are responsible for causing more issues for the people of Brighton 🙁

    Reply
  3. Paul says:
    9 years ago

    Narrowing Surrey St. to a single lane blocked by a bus stop at the end hasn’t exactly helped the situation here. Or maybe it’s just that the paving blocks are the wrong colour and confuse the poor taxi drivers.

    Reply
  4. Rolivan says:
    9 years ago

    I would have thought Network Rail were the owners not Govia who are surely only leaseholders at the very most.

    Reply
  5. Steve says:
    9 years ago

    On a Friday the taxis around the station – their behaviour is crazy. At times it’s gridlock.
    But moving that taxis to the back of the station helps the residence at the front of station; the residence at the back will then suffer.

    Reply
  6. Bob says:
    9 years ago

    And what about the people that live at the back of the station?!

    Reply
  7. Simon King says:
    9 years ago

    The whole redesigned area of Queens Road and Surrey Street has been an absolute shambles?
    Why widen the pavement in Surrey Street? It causes more congestion? And the one way part of Queens Road leading up to the station?
    Why?
    Where is the logic to change this? The bus lane upwards worked fine!
    The taxi rank into the station worked fine!
    Whoever changed this, was clearly inept!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Simon King Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

Two city centre shops slated for demolition

Building manager charged with £162k fraud

Moves to relocate station taxi rank move step closer

Armed officers called after reports woman attacked

Micro school looks to move into property in Brighton

Coffee shop bids to keep back garden sauna

Store boss grilled at licensing panel hearing

Minister boosts hopes for council homes at hospital site

City’s first Michelin-starred chef this century to star at food festival this weekend

Brighton building specialist urges landlords to act on damp and mould law

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
The Elephant in the Room – Preview

The Elephant in the Room – Preview

30 April 2026
Katie Kirby: Lottie Brooks’s Diary

Katie Kirby: Lottie Brooks’s Diary

30 April 2026
City’s first Michelin-starred chef this century to star at food festival this weekend

City’s first Michelin-starred chef this century to star at food festival this weekend

30 April 2026
The Doris Show, Brighton Lantern Theatre, May 14-16th 2026

Doris Day Tells Her Story

30 April 2026
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Kickboxers face fight to extend opening hours

Kickboxers face fight to extend opening hours

by Sarah Booker-Lewis - local democracy reporter
30 April 2026
2

A martial arts school has applied to open from 7am, with some neighbours objecting and others offering support. Kickboxfit (KBF)...

Simpson steers Sussex into strong position on day two v Hampshire

Sussex draw with Yorkshire at Headingley

by Graham Hardcastle - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
27 April 2026
0

Yorkshire 511 (139.2 overs) Sussex 502 (131.4 overs) and 324-8 (86 overs) Match drawn Yorkshire 13 points, Sussex 13 points...

Simpson steers Sussex into strong position on day two v Hampshire

Runs galore but Sussex look set for draw with Yorkshire at Headingley

by Graham Hardcastle - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
26 April 2026
0

Yorkshire 511 (139.2 overs) Sussex 502 (131.4 overs) and 31-2 (14 overs) Sussex (5 points) lead Yorkshire (5 points) by...

Simpson steers Sussex into strong position on day two v Hampshire

Runs keep coming on day two as Yorkshire host Sussex

by Graham Hardcastle - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
25 April 2026
0

Yorkshire 192-1 (60 overs) Sussex 502 all out (131.4 overs) Yorkshire (2 points) trail Sussex (4 points) by 310 runs...

Load More
June 2017
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« May   Jul »

RSS From Sussex News

  • Judge jails man who killed his friend 1 May 2026
  • Two men remanded in custody after burglary spree 30 April 2026
  • County historian to share tales of silly Sussex 20 April 2026
  • Two flee from flat as arsonist sets fire to barber shop below 18 April 2026
  • Four people convicted of plot to throw drugs and phones into prison 17 April 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News