• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
13 August, 2026
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Brighton

Hove renamed West Brighton in council leaflet glitch

by Frank le Duc
Tuesday 19 May, 2020 at 4:57PM
A A
20
Hove renamed West Brighton in council leaflet glitch

Community campaigners reacted with horror when Hove was renamed “West Brighton” in a leaflet from the council and one of its partners.

The leaflet, produced by Brighton and Hove City Council’s Community Engagement Team and the Trust for Developing Communities, went out to homes in the Goldsmid, Brunswick and Adelaide and Central Hove wards.

Former Hove councillor Christopher Hawtree took to Twitter to accuse the council of pushing through an attempt from 20 years ago to rename the town West Brighton.

He said: “The council is cynically using the cover of the virus again to push its West Brighton fixation, which we saw in 2000 was followed by an attempt to close down the library.”

Mr Hawtree added: “The leaflet says that it is going to everybody in those Hove wards renamed West Brighton. A public relations disaster.”

Save Hove campaigner Valerie Paynter tweeted photographs of the leaflets and said that the contacts listed had council email addresses.

Community development support worker Cal Chester said: “This was an unfortunate mistake which will understandably upset people.

“The newsletter was produced jointly between the Trust for Developing Communities and Brighton and Hove City Council as it was recognised there was an urgent need for people to be aware of local support available to them.

“In producing something like this quickly, there can be oversights.

“We will ensure that the mistake is corrected in any future publications.”

Community engagement manager Sam Warren said that council community workers and voluntary groups split the city into north, east, west and central areas for their work.

She said: “These categorisations of the city are just for our working practices and not in any way a deprecation of any area of the city whether that be Portslade, Hove or Bevendean.

“The newsletter should not have been labelled in this way.”

Support quality, independent, local journalism that matters. Donate here.
ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 20

  1. Oliver Knight says:
    6 years ago

    You’re just a suburb of Brighton! Suburb of Brigghhhton!

    Reply
  2. Rostrum says:
    6 years ago

    Quite right … Should be ‘Brighton West’ not ‘West Brighton’ !!!!

    Reply
  3. Martjt says:
    6 years ago

    If Hove is going to be Brighton West does that mean Portslade will be renamed Brighton West West and Southwick Brighton West West West? Maybe best to leave them as Hove Portslade and Southwick

    Reply
    • Peter Challis says:
      6 years ago

      On the Hangleton and Portslade edition we were also downgraded to “Brighton West”. I didn’t notice until I checked after seeing this article.

      Reply
  4. Dave dave says:
    6 years ago

    Yes, patcham can be Brighton northeast, whitehawk is east Brighton, moulsecoombe could be north east but not that north Brighton,ovingdean east east Brighton and saltdean east,east east brighton. Clearly oliver and rostrum live in district 9.

    Reply
  5. Christopher Hawtree says:
    6 years ago

    I was woken from a surreal dream by the ringing cellphone this morning: BBC Radio Sussex asking me to address the county on this even more surreal matter of the Council again trying do away with the great name of Hove. I think we could avert it but have to be vigilant, and keep the Hove Guard at the ready.

    Reply
  6. Valerie says:
    6 years ago

    ……saveHOVE ; ) !

    Reply
  7. Nige says:
    6 years ago

    Can Brighton be rebranded as East Hove please

    Reply
    • Rolivan says:
      6 years ago

      I thought it was HOVE ACTUALLY.

      Reply
  8. voice of raison says:
    6 years ago

    so an honest and explained mistake that Mr Hawtree jumped on trying to cause conflict were there is none. He should be ashamed and apologise for his actions.

    Reply
  9. David StHubbins says:
    6 years ago

    I do think it was inappropriate of Mr Hawtree to react in this way. one would hope that a formally elected official would have the foresight to contact the office for comment first, before immediately assuming its is part of a conspiracy theory and fanning the flames of such.

    Reply
    • Christopher Hawtree says:
      6 years ago

      Er, we have been here before, in 2000, as I said on the radio. When we duly saw an attempt to close down Hove Library. How can the Council again claim that the re-designation is a “mistake”? Residents, I find on many Hove strolls, are alarmed, given the long-running Hove situation. How on earth can anybody blame spellchecker for turning Hove into Brighton West? As it happens, upon the Council I always took care to refer to “Hove and Brighton Council” when speaking and as Chair of the Planning Committee. !

      Reply
      • Peter Challis says:
        6 years ago

        Christopher – can you ever make a post without mentioning that flipping library?

        Reply
  10. catherine k says:
    6 years ago

    almost as offensive as when people call portslade west hove – not very nice areas trying to use the Hove name – not good

    Reply
  11. Voice of Raison says:
    6 years ago

    They don’t blame spellchecker, they explain how an honest mistake was made and not a re-designation. they are working hard in unprecedented times. whereas you Mr Hawtree immediately assume it is linked to something that didn’t happen 20 years ago, and try to blow it up into a much larger issue than it actually is. Be the better person; let it go, accept you overreacted to an honest mistake and apologise.

    Reply
    • Christopher Hawtree says:
      6 years ago

      No, we were put through such misery by cllr Robins’s attempt to close the Library that we have to be forever on the alert in defence of Hove. This Brighton West fiasco has been arousing so much comment on the sidewalks about a cherished place. The “explanation” is fanciful: how can anybody sit down and type – shudder – Brighton West?

      Reply
    • Valerie says:
      6 years ago

      The Brightoncentric focus of officers & many (mainly Labour) politicians since unification on has required constant vigilance. Brighton seediness is offset by & elevated by association with highly regarded Hove

      Reply
  12. voice of raison says:
    6 years ago

    “Sidewalk” don’t you mean “pavement”? This is clearly part of your attempt to push through American English, in place of English!! 🙂

    Reply
  13. Peter Challis says:
    6 years ago

    You’ll probably find in many administrative organisations that the whole of Brighton & Hove (and Portslade!) is treated as Brighton. This may be split into West, Central, and East rather than along the lines of historical boundaries that are only of interest to historians.

    A bit like “Shoreham Airport” being known as “Brighton City Airport” when the “city” is “Brighton & Hove”. Even “Brighton & Hove Albion” now regularly appears on news item as “Brighton”.

    This newsletter is all about support for the residents with details of links within a particular area, and focusing on dealing with Covid-19, which I recall, doesn’t take notice of lines on the ground.

    And I helped out delivering these newsletters in Portslade and I never noticed the same problem with regard to Hangleton & Knoll, North Portslade and South Portslade.

    Perhaps some people stuck in the past have nothing better to do than nitpick.

    Reply
    • Christopher Hawtree says:
      6 years ago

      It is called, bizarrely, Shoreham (Brighton City) Airport – though airstrip would be a more apt description. A frightful parade of sheds. Despite the fanciful name, it cannot take bigger aircraft.

      People in Hangleton surely know that name. They do not gsin anything by its being relabelled West Brighton. Hove is always on the, er, alert after the Library horrors. As Robert Nemeth and Geoffrey Vowden said during a television discussion, Brighton gets everything, Hove nothing – or just a mini-roundabout if it’s lucky.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

Watch solar eclipse safely, urges council

Hove renamed West Brighton in council leaflet glitch

Garden waste collection needs ‘root and branch’ review, says councillor

Roof fire damages house in Saltdean tonight

Work stops play for children in Brighton tower block

Teenager arrested after sex attack on train

Body found in back garden

Murderer jailed for life second time for same killing

Eclipse traffic slows fire engine’s progress to wildfire north of bypass

Another gay venue to close

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
Ghibli comes to Brighton

Ghibli comes to Brighton

13 August 2026
Preview: Wake up to The Wake

Preview: Wake up to The Wake

13 August 2026

Chitty Chitty Bang Bang – a fantasmorgorical show – review

13 August 2026
End of the Pier Show, August 2026, Horatio's Bar, Brighton Pier

Review – The End Of The Pier Show

13 August 2026
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex finish bottom in One Day Cup group after defeat by Middlesex

by Ben Kosky - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
11 August 2026
0

Middlesex 354-8 (50 overs) Sussex Sharks 262 (43.5 overs) Middlesex (4 points) beat Sussex Sharks (0 points) by 92 runs...

Park in Hove to have upgraded games area

Park in Hove to have upgraded games area

by Frank le Duc
10 August 2026
0

Work has started to give a park in Hove an upgraded play area thanks to an unusual recycling project. The...

Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex come up short as Hampshire shine at Hove

by Frank le Duc
9 August 2026
0

Hampshire 383-9 (50 overs) Sussex 332 (48.5 overs) Hampshire (4 points) beat Sussex (0 points) by 51 runs Hampshire’s Toby...

Brighton conquer Rome in Amex friendly

Brighton conquer Rome in Amex friendly

by Frank le Duc
8 August 2026
0

Brighton and Hove Albion 3 Roma 0 Rome wasn’t built in a day, they say, and the 2026-27 Albion team...

Load More
May 2020
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr   Jun »

RSS From Sussex News

  • Teenager arrested after sex attack on train 11 August 2026
  • Man stabbed early this morning 11 August 2026
  • Drought declared across all of Sussex – it’s official 10 August 2026
  • PCSO faces court charged with dangerous driving 7 August 2026
  • Driver dies 11 days after crash 6 August 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News