• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
29 April, 2026
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Business

Gym rebuffed by council planners

Proposals for changes in former Hove church don't work out

by Sarah Booker-Lewis - local democracy reporter
Thursday 7 Sep, 2023 at 7:41PM
A A
4
Hove gym plans exercise objectors

Planners rejected a gym’s plans for a privacy screen and ventilation grilles in a former church building in Hove.

Natural Fit Gym submitted two planning applications for its premises – at St Agnes Church, in Newtown Road, Hove.

But councillors were concerned to learn that one of the applications was retrospective – for work that had already been carried out.

Brighton and Hove City Council’s Planning Committee turned down both applications at a meeting at Hove Town Hall yesterday (Wednesday 6 September).

The two applications were for an outdoor area on the second floor. The first was for obscured “privacy screens”.

The second was the retrospective application – to fit high-level ventilation grilles to the gable ends, a handrail to the parapet wall of the roof and outside lights on the second floor on the south side of the building.

Councillors were concerned about people going outside on to the second-floor balcony through a door which was the subject of a previously withdrawn planning application.

Brighton and Hove Independent councillor Mark Earthey asked whether the terrace was “unauthorised”. Officers said that the doorway to the terrace was unauthorised and granting permission would “regularise” the work.

Conservative councillor Carol Theobald said that the application for plastic screens and grilles was unusual, adding: “This is a particularly lovely church. I don’t think there should be such treatment on a church like this.”

Other councillors said that the building had been “deconsecrated” 40 years ago.

Labour councillor Liz Loughran, who chairs the Planning Committee, said: “I feel uncomfortable that this applicant has created this unauthorised doorway and still hasn’t got permission.

“By permitting the screens, we are encouraging those people who use the site to go out on the terrace, in effect. Those two things, to me, are not logical in planning terms.”

Councillor Loughran said that the privacy screen proposal was contrary to council planning policies on design and the activities that would take place on the terrace would “harm the amenity” of the area.

The application for the grilles was also refused. Councillors said that it was linked with the other application because it included the requirement for access through the unauthorised door.

Support quality, independent, local journalism that matters. Donate here.
ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 4

  1. Charlie Antrobus says:
    3 years ago

    I complain directly to the owner when they installed plastic, yes plastic bushes on that level. They used a boom lift to lift them. When I returned I found the road and pavement littered with plastic branches that had fallen off during the installation process.

    I am discusted that they did not have the decency to sweep up after themselves. These plastic branches would have ended up in the sea via surface run off. This was irresponsible and an act of corporate environmental damage. I took the initiative to pick up all the plastic branches by hand. And they call themselves Natural Fit!

    Peter Rayner co-owner said the decision to use plastic bushes was a board level design one. I assume they thought it was a good idea.

    I have learnt that the joining fee is £300 gate keeping fee to keep the riff raff out, does admin really cost that much? no it’s doesn’t and the monthly membership is £200. This is a rich persons getto.

    Why they could not afford real bushes and employ a gardener? Rayner also stated that it would be costly to have real plants due to the water costs… this facility is running a pool and spa facilities which use lots of water, watering some bushes would be a minor addition. And have they not heard of rain? Rain “the condensed moisture of the atmosphere falling visibly in separate droplets” is freely available on nature.

    And I completely agree we do need more facilities for the 99%. Youth clubs, skate parks, volleyball courts, table tennis, more mobile spars on the sea front, showers on the sea front, not to mention toilets, a space for people to freely play instruments designed in such a way that the sound is directed out towards the sea and away from residences.

    Reply
  2. Jane Bright says:
    3 years ago

    I completely agree with you. As a local resident (a street away) I tried to use the cafe to be told it was members only. This is a walled off area for rich people and adds zero value to the local community. If they have loud people on an external balcony at night that wake up my babies then I’d be furious. Thank you B&H planning.

    Reply
    • Sarah+the+Starfish says:
      3 years ago

      This place adds a lot of value to the community. I used to go there and it is a really lovely gym. Head and shoulders above anything else in Brighton. I wish they would build one of these near me as the only issue is there is no parking. It is also really nice to go somewhere where being older you don’t feel as self-conscious as in many of the other gyms which are full of body builders or 25 year olds.

      Reply
  3. Ben says:
    3 years ago

    The terrace they have built and retrospectively sought planning permission for is directly above my garden and looks directly into our bathroom. We are so relieved that the planning committee saw sense and did not approve this Underhanded attempt to sneak an entire outdoor dining area onto the property. It’s been 3 years in the making, I’m sure they will try again, and so this may continue but for now common sense prevails.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Jane Bright Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

McDonald’s could be off the menu in Hove

City centre pub set to get its garden back

Fire service warns avoid area as crews tackle wheelie bin blaze

Gym rebuffed by council planners

Pub applies for 2.30am closing time

Tribunal orders doctor to be chaperoned when seeing female patients

Fewer homeless people being moved from Brighton to Eastbourne

Women’s stadium to be built next to the Amex

Building manager charged with £162k fraud

Hove home owner seeks consent for shared house revamp

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink

Three Score Dance Previews Betwixt at Brighton Festival

29 April 2026
Time Keeps the Drummer

Time Keeps the Drummer

28 April 2026
Brighton Festival features corruption and revenge in world premiere

Brighton Festival features corruption and revenge in world premiere

28 April 2026
Chiaroscuro Quartet and Consone Quartet, Glyndebourne, 3rd May 2026

Classical Quartets At Glyndebourne

28 April 2026
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Simpson steers Sussex into strong position on day two v Hampshire

Sussex draw with Yorkshire at Headingley

by Graham Hardcastle - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
27 April 2026
0

Yorkshire 511 (139.2 overs) Sussex 502 (131.4 overs) and 324-8 (86 overs) Match drawn Yorkshire 13 points, Sussex 13 points...

Simpson steers Sussex into strong position on day two v Hampshire

Runs galore but Sussex look set for draw with Yorkshire at Headingley

by Graham Hardcastle - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
26 April 2026
0

Yorkshire 511 (139.2 overs) Sussex 502 (131.4 overs) and 31-2 (14 overs) Sussex (5 points) lead Yorkshire (5 points) by...

Simpson steers Sussex into strong position on day two v Hampshire

Runs keep coming on day two as Yorkshire host Sussex

by Graham Hardcastle - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
25 April 2026
0

Yorkshire 192-1 (60 overs) Sussex 502 all out (131.4 overs) Yorkshire (2 points) trail Sussex (4 points) by 310 runs...

Former Brighton and Hove Albion manager speaks about prostate cancer diagnosis

Former Brighton and Hove Albion manager speaks about prostate cancer diagnosis

by Frank le Duc
24 April 2026
0

Former Brighton and Hove Albion and Newcastle United manager Chris Hughton has revealed that he had prostate cancer diagnosed last...

Load More
September 2023
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Aug   Oct »

RSS From Sussex News

  • County historian to share tales of silly Sussex 20 April 2026
  • Two flee from flat as arsonist sets fire to barber shop below 18 April 2026
  • Four people convicted of plot to throw drugs and phones into prison 17 April 2026
  • July trial date set for boy, 16, charged with murdering teen 17 April 2026
  • Serious crash closes A23 just north of Brighton 17 April 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News