• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
7 July, 2026
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Business

Gym rebuffed by council planners

Proposals for changes in former Hove church don't work out

by Sarah Booker-Lewis - local democracy reporter
Thursday 7 Sep, 2023 at 7:41PM
A A
4
Hove gym plans exercise objectors

Planners rejected a gym’s plans for a privacy screen and ventilation grilles in a former church building in Hove.

Natural Fit Gym submitted two planning applications for its premises – at St Agnes Church, in Newtown Road, Hove.

But councillors were concerned to learn that one of the applications was retrospective – for work that had already been carried out.

Brighton and Hove City Council’s Planning Committee turned down both applications at a meeting at Hove Town Hall yesterday (Wednesday 6 September).

The two applications were for an outdoor area on the second floor. The first was for obscured “privacy screens”.

The second was the retrospective application – to fit high-level ventilation grilles to the gable ends, a handrail to the parapet wall of the roof and outside lights on the second floor on the south side of the building.

Councillors were concerned about people going outside on to the second-floor balcony through a door which was the subject of a previously withdrawn planning application.

Brighton and Hove Independent councillor Mark Earthey asked whether the terrace was “unauthorised”. Officers said that the doorway to the terrace was unauthorised and granting permission would “regularise” the work.

Conservative councillor Carol Theobald said that the application for plastic screens and grilles was unusual, adding: “This is a particularly lovely church. I don’t think there should be such treatment on a church like this.”

Other councillors said that the building had been “deconsecrated” 40 years ago.

Labour councillor Liz Loughran, who chairs the Planning Committee, said: “I feel uncomfortable that this applicant has created this unauthorised doorway and still hasn’t got permission.

“By permitting the screens, we are encouraging those people who use the site to go out on the terrace, in effect. Those two things, to me, are not logical in planning terms.”

Councillor Loughran said that the privacy screen proposal was contrary to council planning policies on design and the activities that would take place on the terrace would “harm the amenity” of the area.

The application for the grilles was also refused. Councillors said that it was linked with the other application because it included the requirement for access through the unauthorised door.

Support quality, independent, local journalism that matters. Donate here.
ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 4

  1. Charlie Antrobus says:
    3 years ago

    I complain directly to the owner when they installed plastic, yes plastic bushes on that level. They used a boom lift to lift them. When I returned I found the road and pavement littered with plastic branches that had fallen off during the installation process.

    I am discusted that they did not have the decency to sweep up after themselves. These plastic branches would have ended up in the sea via surface run off. This was irresponsible and an act of corporate environmental damage. I took the initiative to pick up all the plastic branches by hand. And they call themselves Natural Fit!

    Peter Rayner co-owner said the decision to use plastic bushes was a board level design one. I assume they thought it was a good idea.

    I have learnt that the joining fee is £300 gate keeping fee to keep the riff raff out, does admin really cost that much? no it’s doesn’t and the monthly membership is £200. This is a rich persons getto.

    Why they could not afford real bushes and employ a gardener? Rayner also stated that it would be costly to have real plants due to the water costs… this facility is running a pool and spa facilities which use lots of water, watering some bushes would be a minor addition. And have they not heard of rain? Rain “the condensed moisture of the atmosphere falling visibly in separate droplets” is freely available on nature.

    And I completely agree we do need more facilities for the 99%. Youth clubs, skate parks, volleyball courts, table tennis, more mobile spars on the sea front, showers on the sea front, not to mention toilets, a space for people to freely play instruments designed in such a way that the sound is directed out towards the sea and away from residences.

    Reply
  2. Jane Bright says:
    3 years ago

    I completely agree with you. As a local resident (a street away) I tried to use the cafe to be told it was members only. This is a walled off area for rich people and adds zero value to the local community. If they have loud people on an external balcony at night that wake up my babies then I’d be furious. Thank you B&H planning.

    Reply
    • Sarah+the+Starfish says:
      3 years ago

      This place adds a lot of value to the community. I used to go there and it is a really lovely gym. Head and shoulders above anything else in Brighton. I wish they would build one of these near me as the only issue is there is no parking. It is also really nice to go somewhere where being older you don’t feel as self-conscious as in many of the other gyms which are full of body builders or 25 year olds.

      Reply
  3. Ben says:
    3 years ago

    The terrace they have built and retrospectively sought planning permission for is directly above my garden and looks directly into our bathroom. We are so relieved that the planning committee saw sense and did not approve this Underhanded attempt to sneak an entire outdoor dining area onto the property. It’s been 3 years in the making, I’m sure they will try again, and so this may continue but for now common sense prevails.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

Disused school can be come charity hub

Gym rebuffed by council planners

Back garden home given go ahead by planners

Royal Albion refurb plans submitted

Seafront paddling pool to stay closed as arches to undergo £26m overhaul

Poorly built new council homes need £3m of repairs to be fit for tenants

New seafront terrace hits the sun spot

Empty units at old Amex House site could become gym

Mother died after ‘missed opportunity’ to spot problems

Plastic wet wipes ban prompts plea from water bosses

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
Trendy matcha cafe due to open this weekend

Trendy matcha cafe due to open this weekend

7 July 2026
A Dream Reawakened: Purity Ring’s Stunning London Comeback

A Dream Reawakened: Purity Ring’s Stunning London Comeback

7 July 2026
Abigail's Party, Theatre Royal, Brighton 6-11th July 2026

Abigail’s Party Took Us Back Through Time

7 July 2026
New seafront terrace hits the sun spot

New seafront terrace hits the sun spot

6 July 2026
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex slump to 100-run defeat in T20 at Hove

by Bruce Talbot - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
3 July 2026
0

Essex 204-6 (20 overs) Sussex 104 (17.3 overs) Essex won by 100 runs Skipper Simon Harmer had a night to...

Rising tennis star from Hove bows out on first day at Wimbledon

Hove tennis star beaten in doubles at Wimbledon

by Frank le Duc
2 July 2026
1

Hove tennis star Alicia Dudeney was beaten in her first round ladies doubles match at Wimbledon today (Thursday 2 July)....

Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex Sharks mauled by Warwickshire Bears in T20 at Edgbaston

by Joseph Chapman - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
1 July 2026
0

Warwickshire Bears 198-3 (20 overs) Sussex Sharks 122 (16.3 over) Warwickshire Bears beat Sussex Sharks by 76 runs Warwickshire Bears...

Rising tennis star from Hove bows out on first day at Wimbledon

Rising tennis star from Hove bows out on first day at Wimbledon

by Frank le Duc
29 June 2026
0

Hove tennis star Alicia Dudeney made her Wimbledon debut on court 4 today (Monday 29 June) but, despite a battling...

Load More
September 2023
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Aug   Oct »

RSS From Sussex News

  • Plastic wet wipes ban prompts plea from water bosses 5 July 2026
  • Professional criminal with appalling record absconds from prison 4 July 2026
  • Poorly built new council homes need £3m of repairs to be fit for tenants 4 July 2026
  • Tributes paid as long-serving councillor dies aged 57 3 July 2026
  • Why Sussex and Brighton now has a ‘strategic authority’ and when it will elect a mayor 3 July 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News