• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
16 July, 2025
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Brighton

More than 400 objections to cars in North Laine road discounted over technicality

by Jo Wadsworth
Friday 29 Sep, 2023 at 3:27PM
A A
21
Brilliant Brighton Business Improvement District goes to ballot

Gardner Street in Brighton looking north

More than 400 objections to proposals to allow traffic in a newly pedestrianised street are being discounted because they weren’t made through official channels.

Traders in Gardner Street put up posters with a QR code which, when scanned by a smartphone, created a draft email to Brighton and Hove City Council objecting to allowing traffic in the road again.

The shopping street was pedestrianised everyday from 11am to 5pm in November last year, with Green councillors voting in favour, Tories against and Labour abstaining.

However, Labour pledged to partially reopen the street to cars after lobbying by disability groups on behalf of resident Ann Ingle, who said the move meant she could not leave her house during these hours.

Ms Ingle, who has lived in Gardner Street for 15 years, told Brighton and Hove News she needs cars to be able to pull up outside her flat in the middle of the street as her condition means she can’t use a wheelchair.

The latest proposal, which will reduce the hours of pedestrianisation to Fridays to Sundays, is set to be approved on Tuesday by the transport and sustainability committee, which now has a Labour majority.

The report says 61.9% of people who responded to a consultation on these changes were in favour – but says of the 549 comments, 402 were being discounted.

All these said they objected to the reintroduction of motor vehicles from Monday to Sunday, giving the same reasons including reduced safety, reduced wheelchair access, increased pollution and impact on trading.

The report said: “These comments have been noted and are highlighted to the committee, but the information provided to the public is considered to be incorrect.

“The advertised QR code did not provide a link to the council’s consultation … Those responding to the comments were therefore not given all the information required to make an informed decision.”

Green councillor Ellen McLeay, who represents West Hill and North Laine, said: “From speaking to residents and traders in the North Laine it’s clear people want to see a solution that both supports independent businesses, the safety of pedestrians and that puts accessibility at its heart.

“It’s clear that finding a solution that meets everyone’s needs is by no means straightforward. But dismissing more than 400 objections on the grounds of a vague technicality is not the way to do it.

“We recognise this is a complex local issue so it is important that everyone is given the chance to express their opinions and feel they have been taken on board before any decision is made.

“For more than 400 comments to be discounted on what is a questionable technicality and with no flexibility gives the impression Labour does not want to hear alternative views.”

One of the traders whose comments are included in the report, who said he has been trading in Gardner Street since 2005, said: “One of the great things this year has been seeing the ease with which wheelchairs and buggies have been able to get through the North Laine, and how many more we have seen.

“There is something very Orwellian about the equalities officer telling us that the needs of one disabled resident is so much more important than everyone else’s disabilities, not to mention the 60 businesses, hundreds of staff and the rest of the city

“I would like to reach out to our neighbour opposite. We have always been very close to her, we still feel close to her, although recently she has distanced herself from us.

“She is still a friend, and I will never let anyone say anything bad about her, I care so much about her, but this situation clearly needs compromise. That compromise needs to be two way.”

Another says: “I feel it is abhorrent for business to be prioritised over the welfare and access of disabled individuals. I am also aware that there is a disabled resident trapped in their own home – this needs to end. There is no moral justification for this.”

Councillor Trevor Muten said: Councillor Trevor Muten said: “I remain shocked at the Green administration’s decision to entirely close Gardner Street to traffic, which wholly undermined the freedom of a disabled resident, who has been left stuck in their home for months.

“I’m disturbed that instead of apologising to the resident concerned and working with us, traders and residents to find a rational solution to this issue, the Greens are whipping up opposition to a reasonable compromise. Why does the Green Party show such disdain for disabled residents?

“The Labour administration are pleased to be proposing a workable compromise to ensure the vibrancy of this busy street in the heart of the North Laine is maintained, while also ensuring fair access for residents.

“The proposal will ensure that the street continues to be pedestrianised between 11am and 7pm on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays and Bank Holidays.”

ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 21

  1. Tom Harding says:
    2 years ago

    Can’t we just get Bricycles to fiddle the vote…..again?

    Reply
  2. Jane W says:
    2 years ago

    The Greens loved it when they deliberately suppressed democracy, but now are crying about this.
    Isn’t Karma wonderful.
    Can’t wait for cllr Davis’s next column of mindless dribble saying how unfair everything is.

    Reply
  3. Emma says:
    2 years ago

    Just look at the photo and imagine you collapse in one of these premises with a heart attack or stroke or fall down the stairs at Komedia. The ambulance won’t reach you. The delay in starting treatment could mean the difference between life or death. Some of these businesses leave me with the impression that they don’t care about that. They just want your money. They genuinely don’t care about the disabled residents in their street, but the lady you mention is not the only one in Gardner Street who has severely limited mobility. The traders’ apparent heartlessness has put me and my family off shopping there.
    We are not alone. One of my neighbours relies on a wheelchair when shopping. Since the chairs and tables have been allowed in the road, her family have been unable to take her along Gardner Street. Like us, they now shop and go to cafes elsewhere. If my family and my neighbours perceive the traders as so unwelcoming, I imagine others may also do so. When the traders become more inclusive and the street is more accessible, we might return.

    Reply
    • Benjamin says:
      2 years ago

      Bollox Emma, that’s easy access. Don’t try to weaponise the ambulance service when you absolutely no idea.

      Try in the middle of a field when the ground is damp and you’ve got an patient going into respiratory arrest from whatever cocktail of drugs they’ve taken, and the light is fading. That’s tricky access.

      This is nothing.

      Reply
  4. John Walker says:
    2 years ago

    “Ms Ingle, who has lived in Gardner Street…”. Has lived? Or does live?

    It’s a difficult decision for the council to make. Keep the street open for traders, pedestrians, other people that require or prefer more accessible streets without vehicles, or close it off so that one resident (maybe – it’s not clear if they are still resident) has access.

    Surely a compromise can be reached, where the majority of the street is pedestrianised except for an accessibility stretch for that resident, and where only a car for that resident (or emergency vehicles for other residents) is allowed access?

    Reply
    • vintage+fan says:
      2 years ago

      She does live there and has done so for 15 years.

      Reply
      • John Walker says:
        2 years ago

        Ah, that makes sense. The internet archive way back machine shows that the “for 15 years” bit was added in later update.

        Reply
  5. Dave says:
    2 years ago

    It’s not a valid technical issue though. Anyone can make 1 sided claims on any issue and put up posters telling people they vote a certain way. A coffee shop isn’t going to give a hoot about a disabled person who is trapped in their house if it means they sell 10 less coffees a day. This all comes back to the joke adminstration that put this street to pedestrian only without consulting properly on the first place

    Reply
    • Peter A says:
      2 years ago

      Signed off by Green leader, cllr Davis, who clearly has a contempt for the disabled.
      The Greens don’t do consultation (unless it’s fixed ) or democracy.

      Reply
  6. Corman Nook says:
    2 years ago

    Pathetic from the council

    Reply
    • Corman Nook says:
      2 years ago

      “Ann Ingle” can get down the stairs from her flat but can’t make it another 50 metres?

      Reply
      • Brighton Resident says:
        2 years ago

        Stairs have handrails. Stairs can be fitted with stair lifts. Neither of these things applies to a public pavement.

        Also, being able to travel a short distance does not mean you can also travel a longer distance. Even for non-disabled people. Somebody who can run for a bus might struggle with an ultramarathon.

        These are basic obvious facts that even somebody with a great deal of ignorance should be able to comprehend.

        But I suppose it’s easier to publicly vilify a disabled person than figure these things out for yourself.

        Reply
  7. vintage+fan says:
    2 years ago

    Thehumn rights of the disabled Gardner St resident – and she is a resident – must come before greedy traders who litter the street with tables, chairs and other detritus, hampering pedestrian access especially for those in wheelchairs, people with pushchairs and small children and those with limited mobility.

    Reply
    • Corman Nook says:
      2 years ago

      Much better for those in wheelchairs, with pushchairs or small children to be run over by cars instead

      Reply
      • vinvonttage+fan says:
        2 years ago

        Wheelchair users, people with small children and pushchairs use the pavement not the road so they’ll hardly be run over!

        Reply
  8. Chris says:
    2 years ago

    Do the traders pay business rates for the use of the road? It doesn’t look like pedestrianisation, more like a narrow pavement each side of seating for cafe customers.
    The pavement is too narrow anyway, especially when partly blocked by racks of clothes, A-Boards, etc.

    Reply
    • John Walker says:
      2 years ago

      All of which is easily remedied by the council if they choose. Allow the pedestrianisation with conditions, like they do on the continent: traders that want to use the outdoor space pay additional rates for the use; traders are restricted to certain areas to allow the free flow of pedestrians and wheelchair users; cyclists must dismount through the street; access is allowed for permitted vehicles only, including emergency vehicles and other approved vehicles only.

      Reply
  9. Car Delenda Est says:
    2 years ago

    Nothing stops the Motor Mafia..

    Reply
  10. Benjamin says:
    2 years ago

    Not a fan of quashing voices, even if they were made in ignorance. Debate against it, sure. Challenge it, definitely. Shut them out completely? Absolutely not.

    Even discounting the 400, that’s still over 150 comments made, and it would be disingenuous to state that they are all fully apprised of all the documentation, you’d be overestimating the average person to say otherwise.

    If you think people aren’t fully aware of the issue as a whole, then maybe the challenge there is to be better at explaining what the council are trying to do. A sentiment recently said at the Citywide Conference by a Council Officer.

    Reply
  11. Brighton Resident says:
    2 years ago

    How dare the trader quoted claim to speak on behalf of disabled people, while arguing for a clearly discriminatory measure that is strongly opposed by local disability organisations. Would not be surprising if that trader was also involved with the deliberately misleading posters. At least Labour are able to see through some of these dirty tricks, unlike the Greens who seemed to be just as dirty themselves. Hopefully all of the traders behind the nasty campaign to exclude disabled people will continue to see their businesses struggle as a result.

    Reply
  12. vintage+fan says:
    2 years ago

    The QR code posted by traders in the windows of certain shops canvassing for votes against was peddling utterly false information and claiming the road would become open to traffic again every day of the week which is untrue. So no wonder such comments were discounted. Let’s hope none of the people become disabled one of these days.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

Plans for £6.9m swimming pool go before council cabinet

Sinkhole appears outside financially troubled Brighton school

How Brighton’s most useful shop keeps helping customers even though it’s closed

More than 400 objections to cars in North Laine road discounted over technicality

Power cut affects thousands of homes and businesses in Brighton

Lifeboat picks up ill-equipped paddleboarders heading for windfarm at dusk

Water company brings in hosepipe ban after dry spring and heatwaves

Boy, 15, seriously injured in sword attack

Burger bar waits to hear if it can trade until 3am

Carpenter used old employer’s uniform to fraudlently buy goods on account

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
An evening of goth sounds with The March Violets

An evening of goth sounds with The March Violets

15 July 2025
Love Supreme Festival 2025 : Day Three with Maxwell and friends

Love Supreme Festival 2025 : Day Three with Maxwell and friends

14 July 2025
Jessica Winter has ‘Got Something Good’ going on

Jessica Winter has ‘Got Something Good’ going on

13 July 2025
Palindrones headline a night of darkwave sounds in Brighton

Palindrones headline a night of darkwave sounds in Brighton

13 July 2025
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Plans for £6.9m swimming pool go before council cabinet

Plans for £6.9m swimming pool go before council cabinet

by Sarah Booker-Lewis - local democracy reporter
15 July 2025
31

Plans for a new public swimming pool are due to go before Brighton and Hove City Council’s cabinet on Thursday...

Sussex Sharks open T20 Blast with a win

Hampshire Hawks thwart Sussex Sharks in Blast

by Alex Smith - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
13 July 2025
0

Hampshire Hawks 171-4 (17.2 overs) Sussex Sharks 167-7 (20 overs) Hampshire Hawks win by six wickets James Vince hit the...

We have an awful lot of work to do, says Sussex coach

Sussex must up their game in T20, says disappointed Farbrace

by Alex Smith - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
11 July 2025
1

Sussex head coach Paul Farbrace said: “It is a hugely disappointing night. We haven’t been consistent in the last three...

Sussex Sharks open T20 Blast with a win

Sussex Sharks flounder against Essex in T20 at Chelmsford

by Alex Smith - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
11 July 2025
0

Essex 148-4 (16.1 overs) Sussex Sharks 145 (18.2 overs) Sussex Sharks lost to Essex by six wickets Michael Pepper’s pyrotechnical...

Load More
September 2023
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Aug   Oct »

RSS From Sussex News

  • Suspected fare dodger attacks ticket inspector on train 15 July 2025
  • Man dies in three-car crash 13 July 2025
  • Boy, 15, injured in sword attack 13 July 2025
  • Water company brings in hosepipe ban after dry spring 11 July 2025
  • Police officer spared prison after being caught with child porn 11 July 2025
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News