Parking charges are being cut along a stretch of the seafront after “feedback” from businesses, councillors and residents, Brighton and Hove City Council said today (Tuesday 23 June).
The changes affect about 50 parking places towards the eastern end of Madeira Drive where the cost went up almost 250 per cent earlier this year.
The aim was to bring the charges into line with the parking spaces further west in Madeira Drive as well as with another seafront road, King’s Road.
The reductions should be in place by the time the school holidays start next month and bring the cost of the bays into line with the tariff further east at Black Rock.
Labour Councillor Gary Wilkinson, who represents Kemptown ward, said: “We have some amazing businesses on the eastern stretch of Madeira Drive – Sea Lanes, Beach Box Sauna, Yellowave – and we’ve been working with them to try to get this fixed.
“I’m glad we’ve been able to secure a significant reduction to support this vital part of the Kemp Town seafront.”
His fellow Labour councillor Theresa Mackey, who also represents Kemptown ward, said: “This is also about keeping this stretch accessible for residents.
“It’s not as easy to get to as some parts of the seafront – and we want parking to be reasonable to ensure people can use these wonderful businesses and the beach more generally.”
Labour councillor Trevor Muten, the council’s cabinet member for transport and city infrastructure, said: “One of our central aims has been to simplify parking tariffs in the city and make them fairer.
“Madeira Drive previously had sharp differences in the rates charged along different sections.
“However, we also have to balance this with the needs to ensure accessibility and support for local businesses. We appreciate the feedback from residents and businesses. We have listened.”
The council said that it would work to update the charges as quickly as possible, probably in the next three weeks.
The council also said that it would keep parking tariffs under review and would continue to work with businesses on the seafront to ensure the area remains accessible and thriving.
The new charges are
- 1 hour – down from £5.40 to £2.90
- 2 hours – down from £9.30 to £5.50
- 4 hours – down from £15.70 to £10.70
- 6 hours – down from £20.70 to £14.00
- 11 hours – down from £23.70 to £17.20
A petition was started earlier this month urging the council to keep east Brighton seafront accessible for all and had 660 signatures at the time of writing.
It called on the council to “reinstate the lower parking tariff at the east end of Madeira Drive – 30 spaces from the east of the Concorde to the base of Duke’s Mound and 20 spaces immediately west of Concorde”.
There were 363 spaces in Madeira Drive where families used to park all day to visit Madeira Drive and the rest of Brighton. Now you have removed over half the spaces and wonder why you are losing £800k a year parking revenue with plans to remove even more paid parking bays. With high priced parking, visitors won’t stay all day and won’t spend much money in Brighton compared to the old days, Cllr Muten is destroying the local economy and needs to resign.
The parking around the whole of brighton is genuinely ridiculous. Most places you have to pay at least half your hourly wage to park for that hour.
But they still managed to pocket over £20 million pounds in parking revenue last year alone. No one has any idea where that £20million pound went either…. And the price to park here in the winter is £1.60 they raised it to almost 5 times that for the summer until now. And even then they’ve reduced it to just under £3 but that’s still double what you’d pay in the winter. But they still keep trying to convince us all they are doing us a favour…. No wonder no locals want to come into the city let alone businesses and visitors are going elsewhere. Because the cost to park for the day at the beach in Brighton, is on par with a family day ticket to a theme park. It’s so backwards and wrong.
BHCC really are anti-cars and vehicles….
Unbelievable!!
“We have listened”? What response were they anticipating to such a greedy act?