XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
  • About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
23 July, 2026
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
dddd
Home Brighton

Brighton O gets another chance as decision postponed

by Sue Pearson
Monday 11 Jan, 2010 at 7:16PM
A A
0

Ambitious plans for a temporary ferris wheel on the seafront, dubbed the Brighton O, have been given a second chance after a decision on whether to give it the go ahead were deferred.

Brighton and Hove City Council’s planning officers last month recommended the plans for the 60m high wheel should be refused by councillors at this Wednesday’s committee meeting.

cccc

This was because the scheme would interfere with the proposed Brighton Eye observation tower – the i360 – which already has permission, and because it could be too noisy after 9pm, disturbing residents and guests of the Hotel Metropole opposite.

But the decision has now been deferred so further talks can take place.

Both the i360 architects Marks Barfield and the West Pier Trust are expressing concern that the 18 metre overlap could hamper work on the i360, which has planning permission.

Councillor Lynda Hyde, chairman of the planning committee, said: “We have decided to defer the Brighton ’O’ application until the 3rd February committee to give the applicants more time to resolve the issues with the neighbouring site and its overall impact.

“The i360 is an important major project for the city and will bring long-term benefits to the area. The developers of the i360 are concerned that as it stands the neighbouring scheme could make it hard for them to fulfil their planning obligations. Also some of the experts we consulted felt unable to make a full impact assessment because of a general lack of technical detail on the submitted plans, so it seems sensible to give it more time.”

As the plans stand there could be problems with construction traffic and machinery, with two developers working concurrently and that would be a valid reason for refusing the application.

The site, on the Lower Esplanade, east of the West Pier, is part of the Regency Square Conservation Area and close to the Grade I listed West Pier.

Approved in October 2006, the i360 project also includes the reinstatement of key listed features from the West Pier, such as the original Victorian toll booth.

Paramount Attractions has submitted the Brighton ‘O’ application for temporary (two year) planning permission for a spokeless observation wheel with 32 rotating gondolas or ‘pods.’

There are 50 objections and 95 letters of support. Those against feel it would be too overbearing, not in keeping with this part of the seafront and would cause too much noise and disturbance. Objectors feel the Brighton ‘O’ would have far more impact than the i360 which is designed as a slender shape and would be set back from the beach. Some think the wheel is a good idea, but in the wrong place.

Those in support say it will increase tourism, add a modern touch to the seafront and boost the economy.

Marks Barfield have concerns that the ‘O’ plans are too close to their development and overlap both their site and an area of land designated for landscaping by the council.

The West Pier Trust think that the new development could hamper work on the i360.

The Metropole have expressed concerns about noise nuisance and Brighton Sailing Club feel the area they have left to operate in is too restricted.

aaaa

Conservation groups do not object to the scheme on the understanding it does not prejudice the i360 development.

hhhh
ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

Brighton O gets another chance as decision postponed

Brighton primary school cuts pupil numbers

Police fear late licence for store would worsen crime

Heritage groups criticise King Alfred plans

Southern Water boss charged with water quality fraud

Row over noisy fan blows over

Brighton and Hove Albion coach joins De Zerbi at Spurs

Driver wanted for assault

Save our buses, plead Tories, as council eyes greater control

Hove MP leaves cabinet as Burnham becomes Prime Minister

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
First wave of acts announced for debut Melancholy Fest

First wave of acts announced for debut Melancholy Fest

21 July 2026
Fatboy Slim sells out his 4th On The Beach day in a row

Fatboy Slim sells out his 4th On The Beach day in a row

21 July 2026
Boooom! ‘Mutations Festival’ announces 2026 headliners!

Boooom! ‘Mutations Festival’ announces 2026 headliners!

20 July 2026
Brighton’s riot grrrl outfit Pussyliquor to give bandmate a great send off!

Brighton’s riot grrrl outfit Pussyliquor to give bandmate a great send off!

20 July 2026
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex fall short in One Day Cup opener

by Blake Bint - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
22 July 2026
0

Glamorgan 295-8 (50 overs) Sussex Sharks 283-8 (50 overs) Glamorgan (4 points) beat Sussex (0 points) by 12 runs Glamorgan’s...

Council submits plans for £65m new King Alfred Leisure Centre

King Alfred short-changes children and young people, say objectors

by Sarah Booker-Lewis - local democracy reporter
22 July 2026
1

The new King Alfred swimming pool offers little for older children and young adults, according to objectors. Hundreds of people...

Council submits plans for £65m new King Alfred Leisure Centre

Heritage groups criticise King Alfred plans

by Sarah Booker-Lewis - local democracy reporter
21 July 2026
17

Conservation groups have criticised the design of a proposed new £65 million King Alfred swimming pool and leisure centre, saying...

Council submits plans for £65m new King Alfred Leisure Centre

Officials back plans for £65m new King Alfred

by Sarah Booker-Lewis - local democracy reporter
21 July 2026
7

Officials have given their backing to plans for a £65 million new King Alfred swimming pool and leisure centre on...

Load More
January 2010
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Dec   Feb »

RSS From Sussex News

  • Five drug smugglers face jail over £34m cocaine haul 20 July 2026
  • Police hunt man after woman, 20, dies in A27 crash 19 July 2026
  • Police seek witnesses after motorcyclist and passenger injured 18 July 2026
  • Shopping centre closed after panel falls from roof 18 July 2026
  • A welcome to your nearest ‘Port Of Cool’ 16 July 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News