• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
29 April, 2026
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Brighton

Parents respond to plans to cut school intakes across Brighton and Hove

by Frank le Duc
Monday 23 Nov, 2020 at 5:29PM
A A
1
Conservatives criticise delays in reopening Brighton and Hove schools

Proposals to reduce the number of classes at some of Brighton and Hove’s biggest primary schools have prompted parents to take action.

At Downs Infant School, in Ditchling Road, parents and governors have started the Protect Downs Infants website to encourage people to take part in a public consultation by Brighton and Hove City Council.

Downs is one of nine state schools in the consultation as the council said that it needed to reduce the number of school places by 360 for the 2022-23 school year.

By then, an estimated 2,191 children are forecast to start in reception classes, with 629 empty places if no changes are made.

At the moment Downs Infant School has four reception classes, with 120 youngsters starting each September.

Proposals in the consultation would see this number reduced to three classes – or 90 pupils.

Parents are concerned about the risk of losing places as the school has been oversubscribed for the past three years.

They also fear that reducing the published admission number (PAN) will have a knock-on effect on Downs Junior School.

Mother-of-two Rebecca Elton said that the consultation was the “wrong decision for schooling, children and families in this area”.

She said: “Acting now to reduce intake in advance of seeing the admissions numbers rests on some pretty shaky projections and assumptions about families moving into and out of the area and assumes a substantial decline.

“These projections, particularly with covid changing demographic trends, are likely to be wrong.”

She said that it would have a far-reaching impact for a number of years, affecting Downs Infant School, and having a comparable impact on Downs Junior School three years later.

She added: “Having been to the online council consultations and heard quite a few views, I’ve become convinced that the proposals (concerning reducing Downs Infant’s intake particularly) are a wrong decision for schooling, children and families in this area.”

Outstanding

Another mother of two, Kate Crawford, is concerned about the effect on the schools budget of reducing numbers.

She said: “It is an outstanding school with an enormous sense of community and has been consistently oversubscribed for a long time.

“Reducing the school intake by 25 per cent will have a substantial impact on the school budget and will affect the school’s ability to continue with the incredibly high standard of teaching and pastoral care currently on offer.

“The choice of schools in the local area will also be reduced, disrupting the strong sense of community that exists around here.

“It will ultimately mean that some young children will no longer be part of the local community and will have to travel further to school putting additional pressure on parents as well as increasing the amount of traffic on the roads and the number of people using public transport.”

Unethical

Emilia Simpson, who has a daughter in reception at the school and a two-year-old son, thinks the method used to decide which schools are targeted is “unethical”.

She said: “As a mother of a two-year-old boy with special needs I am seriously worried that if the PAN reduction does happen, it will be a step too far on the school budget and will affect the excellent care that Downs Infant School has delivered over the years for children coming from across the city.

“Deciding which school should take the toll of the decrease in birth rate just by looking at the data from GP surgeries omits this point and is completely unethical.”

The consultation includes two other schools with four “forms of entry” – Balfour Primary School, in Balfour Road, Brighton, and Brunswick Primary School, in Somerhill Road, Hove. At both, the council also proposes cutting annual admission numbers from 120 to 90.

Under the proposals, Goldstone Primary School and Stanford Infant School would cut their intake from 90 pupils to 60.

Benfield, Moulsecoomb and West Blatchington primary schools would have one-form intakes.

Protest

Parents of children at Benfield Primary School, in Old Shoreham Road, Portslade, have set up a petition in protest at the proposal.

The petition on Brighton and Hove City Council’s website had more than 600 signatures at the start of the week and said that parents fought off a previous attempt to reduce numbers in 2017.

Started by Harriet Keilthy, it said: “We strongly object to the proposal, we have already petitioned (successfully) against this in 2017.

“We want to reiterate as before, that Benfield Primary, which is stronger now than ever, is a child-centric, well-run, successful school that provides the diversity and choice that we need in this area.”

The consultation also proposes a cut in numbers at Hove Park School and Sixth Form. A similar consultation to reduce the admission numbers at the Portslade Aldridge Community Academy (PACA) has just ended.

The consultation is open on the council website until Friday (27 November). Parents of children aged two to 18 are encouraged to respond by the deadline.

Support quality, independent, local journalism that matters. Donate here.
ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 1

  1. A Hinds says:
    5 years ago

    The council’s forecasts about expected primary place requirements have historically been useless. Only about five years ago they wasted £2.5M of council tax payer’s money needlessly expanding St Andrew’s Primary School in Hove despite being warned that the basis of their projections was seriously flawed. Minutes of the relevant objections can probably still be found on the council website and planning portal.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

McDonald’s could be off the menu in Hove

City centre pub set to get its garden back

Fire service warns avoid area as crews tackle wheelie bin blaze

Tribunal orders doctor to be chaperoned when seeing female patients

Parents respond to plans to cut school intakes across Brighton and Hove

Food waste bin fire was arson, police believe

Fire crews put out blaze in Rottingdean

Man charged with exposing himself on seafront road

What’s happening at the back of the houses and why

Flat owners fear millions of pounds of frozen funds could be at risk

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
Time Keeps the Drummer

Time Keeps the Drummer

28 April 2026
Brighton Festival features corruption and revenge in world premiere

Brighton Festival features corruption and revenge in world premiere

28 April 2026
Chiaroscuro Quartet and Consone Quartet, Glyndebourne, 3rd May 2026

Classical Quartets At Glyndebourne

28 April 2026
Global music icon Angélique Kidjo brings Hope Tour to Brighton Festival

Global music icon Angélique Kidjo brings Hope Tour to Brighton Festival

27 April 2026
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Simpson steers Sussex into strong position on day two v Hampshire

Sussex draw with Yorkshire at Headingley

by Graham Hardcastle - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
27 April 2026
0

Yorkshire 511 (139.2 overs) Sussex 502 (131.4 overs) and 324-8 (86 overs) Match drawn Yorkshire 13 points, Sussex 13 points...

Simpson steers Sussex into strong position on day two v Hampshire

Runs galore but Sussex look set for draw with Yorkshire at Headingley

by Graham Hardcastle - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
26 April 2026
0

Yorkshire 511 (139.2 overs) Sussex 502 (131.4 overs) and 31-2 (14 overs) Sussex (5 points) lead Yorkshire (5 points) by...

Simpson steers Sussex into strong position on day two v Hampshire

Runs keep coming on day two as Yorkshire host Sussex

by Graham Hardcastle - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
25 April 2026
0

Yorkshire 192-1 (60 overs) Sussex 502 all out (131.4 overs) Yorkshire (2 points) trail Sussex (4 points) by 310 runs...

Former Brighton and Hove Albion manager speaks about prostate cancer diagnosis

Former Brighton and Hove Albion manager speaks about prostate cancer diagnosis

by Frank le Duc
24 April 2026
0

Former Brighton and Hove Albion and Newcastle United manager Chris Hughton has revealed that he had prostate cancer diagnosed last...

Load More
November 2020
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« Oct   Dec »

RSS From Sussex News

  • County historian to share tales of silly Sussex 20 April 2026
  • Two flee from flat as arsonist sets fire to barber shop below 18 April 2026
  • Four people convicted of plot to throw drugs and phones into prison 17 April 2026
  • July trial date set for boy, 16, charged with murdering teen 17 April 2026
  • Serious crash closes A23 just north of Brighton 17 April 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News