Seafront traders fear they could go under if paving works overrun

Posted On 30 Mar 2017 at 12:51 pm

Seafront business have been venting their frustrations this week at how seafront building work – or the lack of it – is hurting their trade.

By Finn Hopson


To the west, traders in the new West Pier Arches say they fear that work to repave the area outside their premises with near-identical bricks to match the i360 landscaping will overrun into the Easter holidays, costing them thousands of pounds in lost business.

And to the east, Concorde 2 has made an angry comparison between the money spent on the area around the i360 and the current state of the seafront east of the Palace Pier.

One of the West Pier arches traders, photographer Finn Hopson, has already been told the work is not going to be finished by the original deadline of April 3, and says he fears it will not be done by Easter.

He said: “We have no confidence at all that it will be complete by Easter. Nor do the council.

“This all started with their original plan last year to close us down completely so they could swap one type of paving block for an almost identical paving block outside.

“We agreed that they would complete one half of the area outside followed by the other to leave us with reasonable access for public/customers. Most of that plan was ignored from day one on Jan 3 and we’ve been behind a much bigger building site than we agreed ever since.

“The council got in touch yesterday to say that although the majority will be done by the 13th (the day before Good Friday and already two weeks longer than planned) there would still be some fenced off areas, some incomplete things and some restricted access for public, particularly around the staircase to the i360.

“We still don’t have a firm date for the final completion of everything, it seems likely to be just after the Easter holidays finish, which is the wort possible outcome for all of us.

“The original council statements about this project talked about the scheme supporting the traders and making things better, so far it has been the most detrimental thing we’ve experienced and without Easter we can’t really recoup the losses.

“I keep remembering that originally the was all due for completion by tomorrow, but as i write this I have two guys slicing up bricks outside and a huge crane lifting things around a mostly unpaved site.

“The bottom line is that there are nine small businesses who have already endured two+ years of i360 construction, followed by three months of no income (footfall has been reduced almost to zero for me) and we’re all considering whether its really possible to continue.

“If the project leaves us closed off for the holiday period we will all lose a huge amount of money. It seems rather unfair to expect the smallest businesses on the beach to foot the bill for a mismanaged council project.”

Council leader Warren Morgan and chief executive Geoff Raw went to the seafront office this morning to speak to staff and discuss ways of improving the appearance of the eastern side of the seafront.

A council spokesman said: “The original target of finishing the landscaping by April 3 has slipped because of bad weather – an unavoidable hazard of working on a seafront at this time of year. We now hope to get all or most of that newly-landscaped area open by Easter – particularly the bit near the traders.

“We’re sorry for the inconvenience but we’re trying to implement the investment and improvements traders and residents want – and that inevitably involves some disruption.

“As a council we’re trying to encourage the message that despite the works, people should still come to Brighton and the seafront as there’s still a great time to be had.

“We still await news of our Coastal Communities Fund bid for Madeira Terraces funding – but we made the strongest possible case we could to the government last year.”

  1. Stv15 Reply

    Once the i360 opened last year all work seemed to stop on the surrounding paving… It did not app to restart till February so no excuse for being behind… They just wasted a a big period of time they could have been doing this… I have every sympathy for the traders and they s show be rent free at the very least till it is completed… Brighton and Hove council could not organise a brewery party…

  2. Chris Reply

    Not just rent free, but no business rates payable plus compensation. If the contract is external to the Council, and had been set up properly, there should have been liquidated damages clauses in case of late completion.

  3. David bailey Reply

    It’s disgraceful how the Council have treated the traders. They have no respect for the very businesses they seek to attract to the seafront. The Council have run a coach and horses through the agreements they originally made with these traders for these works and have ignored their complaints.

  4. Bubalya Reply

    Brighton & Hoe Council are perpetually incompetent in every area, they have the opposite of the Midas touch, everything they touch goes wrong, is messed up, delayed, carried out shoddily or not done at all. If anyone thought they would actually get this done by the original date given they must have been in a dream world.

  5. Kemp Town Resident Reply

    Look at Madeira Drive now – it looks terrible and is a major part of Brighton Seafront that has been neglected for years. Now Volks Railway have announced that it will be closed for the Summer so there is now no transport link to Madeira Drive at all which will have a direct effect on the already struggling businesses down there. They should all at least have a reduction or cancellation of their business rates – its the least the Council can do until they start work on regeneration which could/probably will take years!

  6. Christian Reply

    The Council are one of the worst performers when it comes to looking after independent traders and the rates are ridiculous. Some areas in London are cheaper than here without going into Outer London.

Leave a Reply

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.