Labour leadership hopeful addresses party faithful in Hove church

Posted On 04 Feb 2020 at 5:53 pm

The Labour leadership contender Sir Keir Starmer addressed the party faithful in a Hove church this evening (Tuesday 4 February).

Sir Keir Starmer addresses Labour Party members in Hove

Sir Keir is the favourite to succeed Jeremy Corbyn in the contest that runs until a special conference on Saturday 4 April.

He set out his stall at All Saints Church, in The Drive, Hove, from 6pm.

He told supporters that he would unite the party because a divided party would not win power.

He did not expect his colleagues to agree about everything – nor did he think that they should.

But he was keen to present himself as someone the party could unite behind as it looked to remake itself after its general election defeat in December.

He said that he had been an MP for just five years and when he was elected, in 2015, the word Brexit had not even been coined.

Sir Keir, 57, a former director of public prosecutions, said that his party needed to challenge the Prime Minister Boris Johnson, describing him as a man who did not like to be challenged.

And he urged supporters to help bring in the kind of reforms which he characterised as “impossible dreams made possible by a Labour government”.

He said that he wanted to “change our party, change our movement and change our country for the better”.

The first question from an audience of almost 200 people tackled anti-semitism head on.

Sir Keir said: “If you’re anti-semitic, you shouldn’t be in the Labour Party … I will take a personal lead.”

He would be satisfied only when those who have left the party because of anti-semitism felt comfortable to return.

He backed electoral reform and he criticised the way that the media had vilified Jeremy Corbyn and previous Labour leaders and peddled “Tory lies”.

Before the meeting he tweeted: “The selections for Labour candidates needs to be more democratic and we should end NEC (National Executive Committee) impositions of candidates. Local party members should select their candidates for every election.”

It was one of eight reforms proposed by Sir Keir earlier today and reported on the Labour List website

  • Recruit a truly representative set of candidates for future elections.
  • Provide better access for disabled members.
  • Become campaign innovators – by “creating and maintaining a leading technology position”.
  • Make the selections for Labour candidates more democratic and end NEC impositions of candidates.
  • Set up an assembly of members and trade unionists to look at how we can develop policy in a more democratic way.
  • Launch a “transparency revolution” – making public the membership of key committees and allowing members to communicate with their representatives on the NEC.
  • Scrap the NCC (National Constitutional Committee) and create an independent body to deal with complaints.
  • Establish a review to explore how we can encourage more party members to become active in their trade unions and more trade unionists in the Labour Party.
  1. Christopher Hawtree Reply

    There should be an apostrophe after Saints (plural). Hove is particular about these matters. Perhaps Sir Kier will bear this in mind.

    • Frank le Duc Reply

      I thought I’d see how it looked adjectivally rather than possessively 🙂

  2. Peter Challis Reply

    I’m most impressed you posted the story and Christopher commented before the conference had even started. I assume the article was written by Sir Keir?

  3. Frank le Duc Reply

    I wrote a pre-piece and updated it – glad you like it though 🙂

  4. Kumar sarkar Reply

    Every political party has an ideology, Tory ideology is to protect capitalism, Labour is committed to socialism, though this socialism remains ill-defined. So, a political party needs power, state power to achieve its ideological goal. It is absolutely clear that the objective cannot be just to win elections – it is to achieve the objective via a declared political programme. It is a war beteen capitalism and socialism, via a succession of battles. the final battle is won when the people are ready for it.

Leave a Reply to Peter Challis Cancel reply

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.