• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
28 September, 2023
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Business

Plan to build 800 flats in Hove given the green light

by Frank le Duc
Wednesday 4 Mar, 2020 at 8:00PM
A A
9
More than 800 homes planned in £260m Hove scheme

A £260 million scheme to build more than 800 homes in Hove has been granted planning permission this afternoon (Wednesday 4 March).

But councillors said that they felt their hands were tied as they voted it through when just 10 per cent of the flats would be classed as “affordable”.

In all, the developer Moda Living can build 564 flats for rent and 260 retirement flats on the site of the Sackville Trading Estate and Hove Goods Yard, in Sackville Road, Hove.

Just 56 of the flats will be made available to people needing an “affordable” home, with rents set at 75 per cent of the market rate.

But Moda and the landowner Coal Pension Properties were accused of playing “hard ball” by one member of Brighton and Hove City Council.

At Hove Town Hall, the council’s Planning Committee was told that the latest application addressed the reasons for refusal given when a previous application was turned down.

But councillors did not seem convinced that the scheme was all that different as they were told that Moda had also put in an appeal after its initial plans were rejected.

A planning inspector is due to hear the appeal in April, with Moda having withdrawn the “affordable” housing element of the original application. It also wants it latest scheme to be placed before the inspector.

Conservative councillor Samer Bagaeen, who represents Hove Park ward, spoke out on behalf of neighbours.

Councillor Bagaeen, a professor of planning, said that Moda and Coal Pension Properties had played hard ball with the council on the number of affordable homes.

Labour councillor John Allcock, who represents the neighbouring Goldsmid ward, said that there were 9,100 people on the council’s housing waiting list and the scheme “does not help them”.

He said: “This development does not contribute to the city’s real housing need. It’s 10 per cent of homes with 25 per cent off expensive rents. Affordable homes are one of our top priorities.”

An artist’s impression of the Moda Living scheme for Sackville Road in Hove

Green councillor Phélim Mac Cafferty said that he was disappointed that the scheme had not changed enough since last year and he also criticised the lack affordable housing.

But he said that he felt compelled to vote for the scheme because of the wider shortage of new housing in Brighton and Hove.

He said: “We do not have any choice. If the applicant is successful with their appeal, they will be able to do to things to our council and possibly sue us and I don’t think that will be worth it.

“I feel like my hands are tied I’m not very happy.”

Labour councillor Daniel Yates was also frustrated, saying that the council was being told that it could have its 10 per cent affordable housing as long as it did not ask again.

He said: “I very much feel I am being held over a barrel over this 10 per cent.

“I don’t like listening to the argument that if we oppose it, they won’t do it and we’ll get nothing and that 10 per cent is better than nothing.

“I understand it – and the city needs this site regenerated – but it also has a great deal of other needs that need to be met.”

He said that the positives outweighed the negatives but the plans looked like a massive university campus and did not recognise the nature of Hove.

A proposed entrance to the Sackville Road scheme

Neighbour John Mitchell spoke on behalf of Artists’ Corner residents and voiced their concerns about the extra pressure on parking.

He also asked for a significant proportion of the “developer contribution” of £3.5 million to fund pollution control measures but was told that this fell outside the rules.

Independent councillor Bridget Fishleigh voted against the plans. She said: “We need to send a message to developers that we want and deserve better for our city than this.”

Labour councillor Chris Henry, who manages Hove MP Peter Kyle’s office, said that people in the area wanted to the site developed and it “wasn’t going to get better than this”.

Councillor Chris Henry

Moda Living plans to build 52 studios, 202 one-bedroom flats, 268 two-bedroom flats and 42 three-bedroom flats.

The scheme includes a retirement community of 260 homes, with 37 one-bedroom flats and 223 two-bedroom flats and communal facilities including a gym, swimming pool and library.

The “affordable” element works out as five studios, 20 one-bedroom flats, 27 two-bedroom flats and four three-bedroom flats.

The original plans were turned down in part because they included too many studio flats – and the number has been halved in the revised scheme. The latest version also includes more employment space.

Moda’s planning director James Blakey said: “We are absolutely delighted that Brighton and Hove have put their faith in our exciting vision for the regeneration of the Sackville Estate.

“The decision today will enable us, together with our partners, to revitalise a long-dormant brownfield site with new homes and employment opportunities, while also investing £10 million into the local community, including over £4 million on projects spanning education, employment, sport, public art and green spaces, alongside the creation of over 560 full-time jobs.”

ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 9

  1. Christopher Hawtree says:
    4 years ago

    When one hears a builder talk of “our exciting vision” one must fear the worst. Where are they taught such language? Has anybody heard passers-by exclaim, “wow! I’m excited by their vision!”

    Meanwhile I hope that the trees on Sackville Road are not damaged in the process.

    Something could have been learnt from the Sixties destruction of the terraced housing which is now Conway “Court” etc. The Coal Pension areas could have now been used for housing similar to Landseer Road etc. to the west.

    And, in this time of climate emergency, what on earth – as it were – is the Coal Pension? It should be driven out of town.

    Reply
  2. Trace says:
    4 years ago

    I need a 4 bed house for me and my 3 kids. I am single mum on benefits. Will this help me. Can pay 300 A month and need rest from benefits. Also does gym have a sun bed?

    Reply
  3. MegA says:
    4 years ago

    9,100 people on the council’s housing waiting list will not be helped by building of new homes by private developers. New builds have a 10-20% premium on price compare with the same in older stock. It is ridiculous to adhere to the model of getting people on to the housing ladder with new housing. Existing, older stock is the best way to achieve this. People who buy expensive new homes usually sell a cheaper older home to do so. It will add to the stock of cheaper housing but in an indirect way. If the council want to ensure adequate stock of affordable housing the council should acquire land and undertake the development. Mind you, they did spend £250K per pitch at the Horsedean traveler site, so not confident the council could manage a hosing development budget.

    Reply
  4. Joanna says:
    4 years ago

    I am born and bred in Brighton and I used to feel a sense of pride to live here.
    Now the city is totally unrecognisable from what is was and has lost its identity. It’s now full of ugly buildings and rendered walls and cladding at every turn which makes the city look so cheap. Developers clearly dont care about this and are just interested in making money. Shame on Brighton and Hove Council for letting them do this and for letting our beautiful city become so ugly.

    Reply
  5. Rich says:
    4 years ago

    straight on the back of cricket ground development building NO affordable flats and giving a small bribe this is a kick in the teeth
    HARDLY ANY affordable accommodations

    Reply
  6. saveJOVE says:
    4 years ago

    Blackmail decision. The city is a hostage now, trapped by the City Plan and its identified housing need-inspired target fugures along with 5-yr land supply deficiencies. Developers are free to extort bad land use out of BHCC using these Govt-determined constraints.

    It began in the Blair era when the city was formed & SEERA/SEEDA declared that this town (fake city) would be part if a ‘diamond’ economic network with much increased population. Now we are trapped by what was ser in train.

    This city is a hostage to this viciously prejudicial foolishness. We need to right-size for a reasonable quality if life. The sooner the midlands & north are equal to the south, the better! Too many feel they HAVE to be south of Watford to have a life!

    Reply
  7. Ben says:
    4 years ago

    The only truly “affordable” houses have always been council flats/houses.

    The Tory Govt of Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s introduced right-to-buy to increase the percentage of the population who were more likely to vote CONservative.

    The money from Council house sales went to Central Govt, and only a small percentage was then granted back to local authorities to build new stock.

    Only 1 in 5 council houses sold has been replaced, hence a housing shortage!
    The Tories also prevented local authorities borrowing against their assets to finance new housing stock.

    Tories, for the few, never the many!

    Reply
  8. Professor Mike Gibson says:
    4 years ago

    Fundamentally, it was the landowner – the Coal Board Pension Fund -that ‘played hardball’ by selling the site to the highest bidder. MODA agreed to pay a very high price, subject to securing planning approval for a scheme which would cover the development costs of buying the land, construction and a significant profit. The level of rents reflects the anticipated market rents in Hove which MODA judged would be sufficient to make the scheme commercially viable by covering the long term management costs of the scheme. In this system of providing housing on privately owned land ‘affordable housing’ is ‘tail-end Charlie’ and in this particular case entirely within the gift of the Coal Board Pension Fund.. But the Coal Board, MODA and the Council all played by the rules of the game. These rules are set by the government which since 2010 has changed them in fundamental ways in favour of private sector development interests. This has weakened the planning system’s capacity to secure a fair share for the public of the increase in land value that flows from the Council granting planning permission for uses which have a higher value than the existing uses. In this case, changing a run-down industrial estate into a modern mixed-use development, providing badly needed housing and local jobs. It was in this context that the Hove Station Neighbourhood Forum reluctantly supported the scheme in a written submission which attempted to explain why the government’s rules meant that the MODA scheme was the best deal Hove is likely to get – see http://www.hovestationforum.co.uk. In the long term, these rules need re-writing to re-balance public benefit and private profit. In the short term, the Planning Committee should require planning officers to publish a guide on the Council website which explains why they had no choice but to accept this scheme and set out the changes that the council would like to see in the rules of the game.

    Reply
  9. kelly says:
    4 years ago

    we need affordable housing, labour and free wifi plus higher taxes for people with jobs

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

£1k a month garden cabin rental provokes outrage

Football match-day guest parking permits look likely to be scrapped

The Sisters Of Mercy live concert report from the Roundhouse

Hanover low-traffic neighbourhood runs out of road

Top music awards go to Bjork, Wet Leg and … a Brighton record shop

Court date for Brighton man who killed Newhaven couple

First phase of Madeira Terrace restoration could be scaled back as costs soar

Police seek help to identify key figure in Hove assault inquiry

‘Run Like Hell’ it’s Peter And The Test Tube Babies

Electric charging spots to be removed because they would block hearses

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
‘Run Like Hell’ it’s Peter And The Test Tube Babies

‘Run Like Hell’ it’s Peter And The Test Tube Babies

27 September 2023
Green Door Store’s ‘2 3 4 Fest’ a resounding success! (Part Two)

Green Door Store’s ‘2 3 4 Fest’ a resounding success! (Part Two)

27 September 2023
Green Door Store’s ‘2 3 4 Fest’ a resounding success! (Part One)

Green Door Store’s ‘2 3 4 Fest’ a resounding success! (Part One)

27 September 2023
Top music awards go to Bjork, Wet Leg and … a Brighton record shop

Top music awards go to Bjork, Wet Leg and … a Brighton record shop

27 September 2023
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Manager of Brighton and Hove Albion’s women team dismissed after allegations

Albion ease out of Carabao Cup with Europa and Premier League taking precedence

by Tim Hodges
27 September 2023
0

Brighton and Hove Albion are out of the Carabao League cup after a goal from Nicholas Jackson settled the tie....

Carabao Cup Round 3 – Chelsea v Brighton and Hove Albion

Carabao Cup Round 3 – Chelsea v Brighton and Hove Albion

by Tim Hodges
27 September 2023
0

Brighton and Hove Albion go to Stamford Bridge for their first League Cup game of the season. Chelsea entered the...

Sussex come up short against Middlesex in County Championship

Sussex bat their way into a strong position on day two

by Will Symons
27 September 2023
0

Sussex 202 and 256-3 Gloucestershire 195 Classy fifties from Tom Clark, Ali Orr and James Coles put Sussex in a...

De Zerbi repays Bloom’s calculated gamble

De Zerbi relishes reunion with former players as Brighton face Chelsea

by PA sport staff
26 September 2023
1

Roberto De Zerbi said that he would hug Moises Caicedo and Robert Sanchez with pleasure before Brighton and Hove Albion...

Load More
March 2020
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Feb   Apr »
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.