• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
29 September, 2023
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Environment

We feel hoodwinked by Toads Hole Valley developers

by Frank le Duc
Friday 3 Dec, 2021 at 9:27PM
A A
6
We feel hoodwinked by Toads Hole Valley developers

Councillors Vanessa Brown and Samer Bagaeen

We are angry. And our residents are angry after sitting through what barely passes for acceptable community consultation by the promoters of the Toads Hole Valley site in Hove in the form of an online meeting.

You may have read the piece written by one of our residents in Goldstone Crescent on this site. This piece outlined the concerns of the residents, particularly in Goldstone Crescent.

The Aldi site at Court Farm was mentioned. The promoters of Toads Hole Valley are aware of it, they said, and are monitoring its progress, but that’s where that ends.

The absence of leadership at all levels in bringing these two developments together is staggering in terms of what it means for the city in general and for Hove in particular.

Our residents in Hove Park have for a long-time expressed concerns over what the increase in traffic as a result of the Toads Hole Valley development would mean for residents along Goldstone Crescent, Woodland Drive and all the way along to the Fonthill Road junction.

As the local councillors, we are particularly angry that the junction of Goldstone Crescent at the Old Shoreham Road will be enlarged to create more capacity.

This cannot be acceptable under any circumstance and the esteemed consultants whose fingerprints are all over this development site will have a lot of explaining to do while their corporate managers parade environmental, social and good governance credentials. These are the Atkins, the Vectos and the Mott MacDonalds of this world.

Curiously, the promoters and their agents said at the online meeting that the Brighton and Hove data on traffic shows no growth of traffic on the road network in this part of the city and likely no future growth as well.

So if this is the case, then the question for the promoters is why build an additional 180 houses on the site?

This of course takes the total to 1,062 units, well above the 700 allocation for the site in City Plan Part 1. And it is the best reason to chuck this back at the promoters when it comes before the Planning Committee and say, “No, we will see you at the Planning Inspectorate.”

But ours is a risk-averse council that has prioritised risk management over the benefits for citizens so we have little faith in the decision-making process.

What’s also really making us more angry is that having ditched the secondary school in the original application, which was never going to be built by the way, not for the foreseeable future, this removal was being used by the promoters to justify the decrease in projected traffic and therefore the increase in housing numbers.

These promoters and their partners in presenting the project the way they did, showed total disrespect for the residents of this part of the city.

Cycle lanes were conveniently thrown into the conversation every now and again even though, as residents and cyclists in the area have told us, these are not the routes they want.

In terms of the planning application for the site, this is of course for an outline application, meaning it’s a parameter plan with little or no detail.

The masterplan predates the pandemic and does not even attempt to respond to the changing urban, infrastructure or climate requirements.

This is an outline scheme, in a city that is shrinking, with a lead promoter, no assigned housebuilder and no sense of how the “as built” development will contribute to the city’s net zero journey by building out a greenfield site in the 2020s to a 1970s masterplan.

Councillor Samer Bagaeen and Councillor Vanessa Brown represent Hove Park ward on Brighton and Hove City Council.

ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 6

  1. Jan says:
    2 years ago

    This article is incomprehensible. For example: “But ours is a risk-averse council that has prioritised risk management over the benefits for citizens so we have little faith in the decision-making process”. What on earth does this mean?

    It’s just more ranting from a couple of permanently outraged Tory councillors. Perhaps they should raise their concerns with the conservative government, who are responsible for setting the planning policies which councils follow?

    Reply
    • Simon says:
      2 years ago

      What don’t you understand? I suspect a prejudice behind these comments. These are not councillors who are permanently outraged, far from it. They have the community and the area in their consideration and are fighting hard to protect both. Put your politics to one side.

      Reply
    • james says:
      2 years ago

      How can aldi/lidl (not much difference) be allowed to build a blot on the landscape. How many stores do their customers need and why build it near devils dyke? I try not to shop with them now. they dont seem to respect the environment.

      Reply
    • fed-up with brighton politics says:
      2 years ago

      The history of this, if you even bothered to keep up to date and understand what has been happening just a little, which you obviously have not, is that, in the past, council officers who are presumably consumed with financial issues rather than principles have advised committees not to turn down applications because of the costs of the appeals. However, thankfully, committees have shown signs recently of standing on principles, the Brighton Marina poundshop flats being a case in point. These plans were turned down by the government.

      No idea what fighting the appeal cost the council, but they were in the right.

      Reply
  2. Rob says:
    2 years ago

    Do the councillors oppose the development altogether? What do they want? We have a declining birthrate that has sunk well below 2, partly because prospective parents cannot afford a family home. If anywhere in this city is right for new housing, it’s Toads Hole Valley, so less outrage and fear and something more constructive would be helpful right now.

    Reply
  3. Nathan Adler says:
    2 years ago

    Something sounds wrong when and initial allocation of 700 has risen to over a 1000 units! A council that constantly moans about vehicle usage and congestion and yet we squeeze more and more into the city – no wonder congestion is worse.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

Brazen bike thief steals £3.5k ebike as witnesses take pictures

Electric charging spots to be removed because they would block hearses

£1k a month garden cabin rental provokes outrage

Council faces £70m budget gap

Council books further £2.5m loss on Brighton i360 debt

Top music awards go to Bjork, Wet Leg and … a Brighton record shop

Football match-day guest parking permits look likely to be scrapped

We feel hoodwinked by Toads Hole Valley developers

Prankster artists swap snaps of Brighton tourist traps for housing estates

Is this your giant husky?

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
Helen McCookerybook & James McCallum to bring The Chefs to Woodingdean

Helen McCookerybook & James McCallum to bring The Chefs to Woodingdean

28 September 2023
It’s certainly not the ‘End Of World’ for PiL

It’s certainly not the ‘End Of World’ for PiL

28 September 2023
‘Run Like Hell’ it’s Peter And The Test Tube Babies

‘Run Like Hell’ it’s Peter And The Test Tube Babies

27 September 2023
Green Door Store’s ‘2 3 4 Fest’ a resounding success! (Part Two)

Green Door Store’s ‘2 3 4 Fest’ a resounding success! (Part Two)

27 September 2023
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket

Sussex scent victory after a dominant day at Hove

by Will Symons
28 September 2023
0

Sussex - 202 and 505-7 (declared) Gloucestershire - 195 and 113-5 Sussex have victory in their sights after a commanding...

Manager of Brighton and Hove Albion’s women team dismissed after allegations

Albion ease out of Carabao Cup with Europa and Premier League taking precedence

by Tim Hodges
27 September 2023
0

Brighton and Hove Albion are out of the Carabao League cup after a goal from Nicholas Jackson settled the tie....

Carabao Cup Round 3 – Chelsea v Brighton and Hove Albion

Carabao Cup Round 3 – Chelsea v Brighton and Hove Albion

by Tim Hodges
27 September 2023
0

Brighton and Hove Albion go to Stamford Bridge for their first League Cup game of the season. Chelsea entered the...

Sussex come up short against Middlesex in County Championship

Sussex bat their way into a strong position on day two

by Will Symons
27 September 2023
0

Sussex 202 and 256-3 Gloucestershire 195 Classy fifties from Tom Clark, Ali Orr and James Coles put Sussex in a...

Load More
December 2021
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Nov   Jan »
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.