Rubbish collections could switch from weekly to fortnightly by next July in Brighton and Hove if all goes to plan for the council.
Brighton and Hove City Council’s cabinet members are being asked to approve spending £1.3 million to prepare the environmental services team for the shift to fortnightly collections at a meeting on Thursday 16 July.
The money would be spent hiring vehicles and recruiting 17 extra staff including mechanics and a team to remove “side waste” – overspill rubbish left beside or on top of bins – as well as to clear communal recycling points.
The council’s cabinet is also being asked to agree that officials should start preparing for a fortnightly service. This would later be subject to a final decision – also to be taken by the 10 senior councillors.
The proposals next week follow a decision in January when the council’s cabinet agreed that officials should explore options to reduce rubbish collections from weekly to fortnightly because recycling collections were more frequent and citywide food waste collections were starting.
In January, Labour councillor Tim Rowkins, the council’s cabinet member for environmental services and net zero, said that Brighton and Hove was one of just 62 councils out of 317 still collecting household rubbish weekly.
The latest report to the cabinet said: “The service has experienced significant historic issues which have resulted in it operating sub-optimally over a sustained period.”
Earlier reports spelt out in more detail some of those issues, most notably when the environmental services team was known as Cityclean.
An independent report found evidence of a “toxic culture” at the Cityclean depot, in Hollingdean, including bullying, racist and sexist abuse, intimidation and violence.
The latest cabinet report said: “Considerable progress has already been made to improve performance, including ongoing culture change, the introduction of digital technology, increased recycling opportunities and the delivery of a new separate food waste collection service.
“But there continues to be challenges in delivering the quality of service to which we aspire.
“The improvements so far have increased the options for recycling, including the acceptance of a wider range of materials.
“This should result in a significant reduction in residual waste, thereby creating a strong foundation to take forward further change, although the lag on the waste data means we have not yet been able to see the extent to which this has happened.
“The reliability of collections needs further improvement to ensure the change to fortnightly residual waste collections can be introduced successfully in 2027.”
A waste composition survey earlier this year found that 45 per cent of rubbish – or 2.36kg per household a week – could be recycled. Almost 30 per cent was food waste and 15 per cent counted as mixed recycling.
The council has been collecting more than 100 tonnes of food waste a week but almost half of the material currently placed in rubbish bins could be recycled or put into food waste collections.
The only thing that has improved is the dodging of the issues. Renaming CityClean is not an achievement, just a rebranding of the incompetence inherent in the management of this service. Support the workforce and the job will get done.
The workforce were a joke. Bunch of old men refusing to retire and bullying anyone who dared to come to work and do the job properly. Thankfully most of them have been sacked now.
an App for reporting is essential
I believe the council have been looking at an app more generally for a couple of different services. Certainly should do, considering some data I was reading that phones were on of the main ways people interact with the website.
The build, run and maintain costs for mobile apps are considerable.
Although native Android and iOS apps give the best user experience, some organisations prefer mobile-friendly websites. This can save time and money…accepting it’s a different user experience to native apps.
Half the galaxy-brains in this site’s comments section would go bananas if the council created native apps and then published the annual dev costs.
Please please please replace the recycling boxes with actual bins. Sick of my stuff blowing doythe road
This report is rather foggy. You either go from weekly to fortnightly or fortnightly to weekly.
1st line of story:- “Rubbish collections could switch from fortnightly to weekly by next July in Brighton and Hove if all goes to plan for the council.”
Oops, methinks this might be the other way round!
Is the heat playing tricks with my eyesight or weren’t the council bragging only yesterday, with Cllr Rowkins posing in a high viz, that they had four new bin crews? Seems like political suicide to push dropping down to fortnightly collections what with a local election coming up, but hey, their funeral.
There’s a fair bit of academia that supports fortnightly collections, but caveated with the other collections like recycling and food waste are reliable.
I suspect many are not confident in the latter.
Well they do need to recoup the £50m they wrote off for the i360 somehow.
Absolute disaster.
Doesn’t the Council see how filthy this town is already.
Loads more overflowing rubbish bins will rapidly turn into
more lawless streets, to go with all the graffiti.
Isnt the chaos at the Old Steine a clue that our useless council
haven,t got any idea how to run a town.
No recycling picked up in clyde road area for a month now. Tried emailing but as usual ignored. Time for sankey to go
“The money would be spent hiring vehicles and recruiting 17 extra staff including mechanics and a team to remove “side waste” – overspill rubbish left beside or on top of bins – as well as to clear communal recycling points.” As it is patently obvious that it will create vast amounts of extra rubbish on the streets what is the advantage of moving to fortnightly collections?
The mindset, from where it’s been done nationally, is to encourage better recycling alongside savings, because quite frankly, we are god awful at it, statistically speaking, and culturally.
What Council Tax reduction can we expect for collections going down to bi-weekly?
£0 because savings will be used to cover the shortfalls elsewhere – something you have complained about before, so you should be pleased with this!
So the council spends more of our money but we get reduced service?
How is this fair?
Let’s reduce the councillors. That should save us some money.
If they’re reducing the service, why do they need an injection of £1.3M and more staff? Surely they should be able to cover the fortnightly service with less resources, otherwise what is the point?
We were allocated a large 240 litre rubbish bin a few years ago, but asked for a smaller one. As they’re going to bring in fortnightly collections, we asked for a larger bin but were declined, most probably because there’s only 2 of us. We do recycle what we can, also use a private licenced waste contractor at times. I think when Steve left, we couldn’t fathom the bulky waste collections, so now bypass them. Everyone’s waste is different.
If the move from weekly to fortnightly rubbish collections saves money, shouldn’t the £1.3m be self-financing?
If not, why are we doing it?
Seems normal, logical, business decision making doesn’t apply to Brighton and Hove City Council 🙄
Where I live we have communal bins on the street. Rarely have they overflowed and normally emptied every other day. They work well, but I do have to help out wheelchair users and some elderly people from time to time. Should be a model for all.