• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
14 July, 2026
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Brighton

Residents slam ‘unnecessary’ safety gate on pond jetty

by Jo Wadsworth
Thursday 24 Sep, 2020 at 4:15PM
A A
5
Residents slam ‘unnecessary’ safety gate on pond jetty


The city council has put up a permanent fence and gate to stop children walking by themselves onto a jetty over fears they could fall into the inches-deep water.

There are no barriers between the footpath and Queens Park pond, but the council has been putting up fences to stop people walking on the jetty since it was completed in March last year, as it said adjustments were needed to make it safe.

Over the last 18 months, the barriers have regularly been moved, and sometimes thrown in the pond, and thousands of people have safely used the jetty to watch the pondlife with no recorded accidents.

Resident Ken Frost, who has chronicled the developments around the platform which he has dubbed #jettygate, said: “The gate is an unnecessary cost for no benefits

“It is a metallic monstrous carbuncle out of keeping with the pleasing lines and form of the jetty.

It’s also easily circumnavigated, and the rest of pond has no fence so kids and idiots still can fall in.

“Why was this not in the original design if it’s so necessary?”

A council spokesperson said: “After advice from the Royal Society of Preventing Accidents (RSOPA), we have put in place a gated fence for continued access of the jetty in Queens Park by members of the public.

“There was previously a temporary fence put place to ensure safety, but as this was continually vandalised we have replaced this with a more permanent structure.

“We are pleased that we have had no reports of accidents in the last 18 months. As the health and safety of our residents is of prime importance to us, we are also putting in place an anti-slip surface for the winter so that the jetty continues to be safe.

“We will continue to review the health and safety of our measures and will continue to work with RSOPA to this end.”

The jetty was built by the Friends of Queen’s Park using money from local developers – but before it was completed, the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents made a surprise inspection and deemed it unsafe.

They raised concerns that there is not enough edging to stop buggies and wheelchairs rolling over the edge. This has now also been fixed.

Support quality, independent, local journalism that matters. Donate here.
ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 5

  1. Rolivan says:
    6 years ago

    Please could somebody tell me how many accidents there have been as whilst growing up and using the Park as both an area for play and as a thoroughfare I cannot recall there ever being an accident at the pond or rock garden, there were a few minor accidents in the play area but ‘The Parkie’was never far away.
    I find it even more strange that the small railings were taken away from Valley Gardens and other areas throughout the City probably just because the painting of them became too expensive?

    Reply
    • Chris says:
      6 years ago

      I presume the railings in Valley Gardens were deemed a “tripping hazard” for the happy campers in the area so were removed on Health & Safety grounds.

      Reply
  2. Billy says:
    6 years ago

    More stupidity and wasting money.

    Reply
  3. Christopher Hawtree says:
    6 years ago

    Nobody except headline writers uses the word “slam”, which is all the odder here as people are objecting to the gate: they want it open rather than slammed shut.

    Reply
  4. Tim Johnson says:
    6 years ago

    So does the gate prevent entry onto the jetty or simply prevent entry without operating a latch? If the latter then why all this fuss?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

City centre gardens reopen to public

Residents slam ‘unnecessary’ safety gate on pond jetty

Fountain soap pranksters urged to stop

Landmark Brighton building to be put up for sale

Fire crews spend the night tackling wildfire at the Devil’s Dyke

Former Brighton and Hove Albion footballer faces another major heart op

Concern over resignation of Brighton tenant rep

Love Supreme Festival 2026: Day Three Report

Report by Royal Sussex expert casts doubt on Lucy Letby verdicts

Brighton creatives launch bid to buy New England House

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
I’m Sorry, Prime Minister – Hacker and Sir Humphrey’s last hurrah opens in Brighton tonight

I’m Sorry, Prime Minister – Hacker and Sir Humphrey’s last hurrah opens in Brighton tonight

14 July 2026
We Are Scientists to celebrate 20th Anniversary of classic debut ‘With Love & Squalor’

We Are Scientists to celebrate 20th Anniversary of classic debut ‘With Love & Squalor’

13 July 2026
Come and have a ‘Slack Sunday’ on Brighton Beach

Come and have a ‘Slack Sunday’ on Brighton Beach

13 July 2026
Love Supreme Festival 2026: Day Three Report

Love Supreme Festival 2026: Day Three Report

11 July 2026
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex beaten by Hampshire in T20 Blast

by Paul Weaver - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
12 July 2026
0

Sussex Sharks 186-5 (20 overs) Hampshire Hawks 190-6 (19.5 overs) Hampshire won by 4 wickets By Paul Weaver at Hove,...

Former Brighton footballer speaks out after racist claim blights European fixture

Former Brighton and Hove Albion footballer faces another major heart op

by PA report
12 July 2026
0

Former Brighton and Hove Albion footballer Connor Goldson has revealed that he will undergo open heart surgery for the second...

Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex beat Middlesex at Hove in T20 Blast

by Ben Kosky - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
10 July 2026
0

Sussex Sharks 213-3 (20 overs) Middlesex 195-9 (20 overs) Sussex Sharks 213-3 beat Middlesex 195-9 by 18 runs Daniel Hughes...

Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex roundly beaten by Surrey in T20 clash at the Oval

by Bruce Talbot - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
8 July 2026
0

Sussex 176-7 (20 overs) Surrey 177-2 (17.2 overs) Surrey beat Sussex by 8 wickets Jason Roy’s fifth T20 century for...

Load More
September 2020
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« Aug   Oct »

RSS From Sussex News

  • Man, 73, in red mankini held on suspicion of exposing himself 13 July 2026
  • Fire crews spend the night tackling wildfire at the Devil’s Dyke 11 July 2026
  • Vandals target hotel twice in a week 11 July 2026
  • Mercedes driver hunted after biker badly hurt in A27 hit and run 11 July 2026
  • Driver faces court charged with attempted murder after man hit by car 10 July 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News