• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
19 June, 2026
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Brighton

Residents slam ‘unnecessary’ safety gate on pond jetty

by Jo Wadsworth
Thursday 24 Sep, 2020 at 4:15PM
A A
5
Residents slam ‘unnecessary’ safety gate on pond jetty


The city council has put up a permanent fence and gate to stop children walking by themselves onto a jetty over fears they could fall into the inches-deep water.

There are no barriers between the footpath and Queens Park pond, but the council has been putting up fences to stop people walking on the jetty since it was completed in March last year, as it said adjustments were needed to make it safe.

Over the last 18 months, the barriers have regularly been moved, and sometimes thrown in the pond, and thousands of people have safely used the jetty to watch the pondlife with no recorded accidents.

Resident Ken Frost, who has chronicled the developments around the platform which he has dubbed #jettygate, said: “The gate is an unnecessary cost for no benefits

“It is a metallic monstrous carbuncle out of keeping with the pleasing lines and form of the jetty.

It’s also easily circumnavigated, and the rest of pond has no fence so kids and idiots still can fall in.

“Why was this not in the original design if it’s so necessary?”

A council spokesperson said: “After advice from the Royal Society of Preventing Accidents (RSOPA), we have put in place a gated fence for continued access of the jetty in Queens Park by members of the public.

“There was previously a temporary fence put place to ensure safety, but as this was continually vandalised we have replaced this with a more permanent structure.

“We are pleased that we have had no reports of accidents in the last 18 months. As the health and safety of our residents is of prime importance to us, we are also putting in place an anti-slip surface for the winter so that the jetty continues to be safe.

“We will continue to review the health and safety of our measures and will continue to work with RSOPA to this end.”

The jetty was built by the Friends of Queen’s Park using money from local developers – but before it was completed, the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents made a surprise inspection and deemed it unsafe.

They raised concerns that there is not enough edging to stop buggies and wheelchairs rolling over the edge. This has now also been fixed.

Support quality, independent, local journalism that matters. Donate here.
ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 5

  1. Rolivan says:
    6 years ago

    Please could somebody tell me how many accidents there have been as whilst growing up and using the Park as both an area for play and as a thoroughfare I cannot recall there ever being an accident at the pond or rock garden, there were a few minor accidents in the play area but ‘The Parkie’was never far away.
    I find it even more strange that the small railings were taken away from Valley Gardens and other areas throughout the City probably just because the painting of them became too expensive?

    Reply
    • Chris says:
      6 years ago

      I presume the railings in Valley Gardens were deemed a “tripping hazard” for the happy campers in the area so were removed on Health & Safety grounds.

      Reply
  2. Billy says:
    6 years ago

    More stupidity and wasting money.

    Reply
  3. Christopher Hawtree says:
    6 years ago

    Nobody except headline writers uses the word “slam”, which is all the odder here as people are objecting to the gate: they want it open rather than slammed shut.

    Reply
  4. Tim Johnson says:
    6 years ago

    So does the gate prevent entry onto the jetty or simply prevent entry without operating a latch? If the latter then why all this fuss?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

Councillors face more complaints about their conduct

Derelict seafront hostel set to become 27-person shared house

Andy backing for by-election candidate in Hove

Residents slam ‘unnecessary’ safety gate on pond jetty

Tenant rep questions use of homes bought back by council

Power restored to hundreds of homes in Hove

Staff at troubled property company reportedly quit

Tenants in a lather as communal washing machines keep breaking down

Dog walker threatened with prison – again – over another attack

Driver denies causing crash which killed young man

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
Tributes paid to man at the creative heart of our community art

Tributes paid to man at the creative heart of our community art

19 June 2026
Darkwave duo Lebanon Hanover announce Brighton concert

Darkwave duo Lebanon Hanover announce Brighton concert

17 June 2026
HENGE announce 75 shows across 17 countries

HENGE announce 75 shows across 17 countries

17 June 2026
Immersion share new single ahead of forthcoming album and tour

Immersion share new single ahead of forthcoming album and tour

17 June 2026
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Price caps profitable day one as Sussex host Hampshire at Hove

by Paul Weaver - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
19 June 2026
0

Hampshire 191 (60.4 overs) Sussex 121-3 (35 overs) Sussex (3 points) trail Hampshire (0 points) by 70 runs with seven...

Manager of Brighton and Hove Albion’s women team dismissed after allegations

Brighton and Hove Albion fixtures announced

by Frank le Duc
19 June 2026
1

The Premier league has published the fixture list for the coming season – and Brighton and Hove Albion are due...

Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex top table after innings win over Glamorgan

by Paul Weaver - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
14 June 2026
0

Glamorgan 155 (51.2 overs) and 268 (99.3 overs) Sussex 521 (125.1 overs) Sussex (23 points) beat Glamorgan (2 points) by...

Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex end day two at Hove in commanding position against Glamorgan

by Bruce Talbot - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
13 June 2026
0

Glamorgan 155 (51.2 overs) and 42-0 (12 overs) Sussex 521 (125.1 overs) Glamorgan trail by 324 runs with 10 wickets...

Load More
September 2020
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« Aug   Oct »

RSS From Sussex News

  • Evidence for social media ban for under-16s is overwhelming, says MP 17 June 2026
  • Police officer faces court charged with assaulting child 15 June 2026
  • Commuting burglar caught red-handed 12 June 2026
  • Police identify two suspects after rail worker punched unconscious 11 June 2026
  • Sussex ranks among Britain’s catfishing hotspots as dating scams net £4m 11 June 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News