Hundreds object to plans for flats next to music venue

Posted On 08 Dec 2022 at 3:43 pm

More than a thousand music fans have objected to plans to build holiday flats next to one of Brighton’s best known live venues.

Brighton and Hove News reported on plans to build flats and commercial units on the old Thrifty car rental plot next to the Prince Albert pub in August.

The deadline for comments was midnight last night, and following an eleventh hour appeal by live venue campaigner Mark Stack, 1,093 people left comments to object. Another 34 have been left today.

Their main fear is that by building flats next door, it will open the door for future residents to submit noise complaints, which can cripple a venue’s business.

Councils have a statutory duty to deal with any complaints, and although they do not have the power to close a venue down, they can require it to take measures which effectively prevent live music, with the threat of expensive court action for not complying.

This has contributed at least two live venues closing in Brighton and Hove – the Freebutt in 2010 and Blind Tiger in 2014.

However, new planning guidance just adopted by the council includes rules which say that developments such as housing shouldn’t be built next to nuisance generating uses – an example of what is known as an “agent of change” principle.

Mr Stack said: “One of the AirB&B bedrooms will back onto the wall where the venue’s stage is. It is the same situation as has happened to Manchester’s Night and Day Cafe venue, which is currently fighting a noise abatement notice in the courts.

“We can’t keep letting this happen to our grassroots venues. It is clearly bad planning to build a bedroom right next to a venue’s drumkit.

If planning permission is granted, then due to new government planning laws, there is nothing stopping the builder converting the whole space into permanent homes. The council would be powerless to stop them.

“When you consider that the Prince Albert is literally a 30 second walk away from the train station, it seems highly likely to me, that no developer would be able to resist the mega money they could make from having the building all residential and selling them to London commuters.

“I am told that show of feeling, that acknowledgement of how much this iconic music venue means to people, will have a great impact on the planning committee; particularly with Council Elections coming up in six months time.”

In 2010, the Freebutt Pub in Phoenix Place closed after someone living in a flat built against its outdoor wall made a noise complaint and its owners could not afford the noise insulation works the council said would be required.

In 2014, the Blind Tiger in Grand Parade closed, also blaming a noise complaint – although the venue was already in financial difficulties.

Brewdog took over the site, and reportedly bought the two flats above to prevent them being leased to people who would make similar complaints.

The council’s newly adopted City Plan Part 2 states: “Sensitive developments/uses should not be located in proximity to significant pollution and / or nuisance generating uses except where appropriate mitigation can be provided by the developer prior to occupation.

“In accordance with the ‘agent of change principle’ set out in the NPPF91, where the operation of an existing business or community facility could have a significant adverse effect on new development (including changes of use) in its vicinity, the applicant will be required to provide suitable mitigation prior to occupation.

“Where appropriate, covenants will be required to remove the right of occupants of new development to complain about disturbance in order to protect existing uses and businesses from the imposition of operating restrictions which could affect their ability to function.

“Sussex local authorities have developed guidance on noise to provide advice for developers and their consultants when making a planning application.”

  1. Valerie Reply

    Planning consent would represent disruption of trade. If we were a mafia state it would be failing state, no rule of law stuff. Coercion to force the pub to sell to the mafia…

    I trust this application – which does not even address affordable housing issues – is refused.

    The Prince Albert is one reason young people in the srts choose to live in Brighton. Do not sterilise the geese laying the golden eggs.

  2. Peter Reply

    The flats will be built then someone moving in will complain about the noise from the venue and it’s music license will be revoked The venue will loose money and in time it will be demolished to make room for more flats The council thinks we are all idiots

  3. Anni.M Reply

    Developers are sucking the life out of Brighton and Hove. We need our Venues, Arts and Music is Vital.

  4. Jessica Reply

    It should be just converted into parking spaces, a shop or office space. I agree with the pub. They were there first and we need these types of venues for the health of the local economy. As a holiday flat it will be sunk with this noise next door as most tourists won’t like it.

  5. Lord Emsworth Reply

    Venues like the Albert must be protected – part of our City’s musical heritage and an essential part of our cultural life

  6. Peter Reply

    The Albert is one of the venues that makes Brighton unique. The reason the the council is so keen to build the flats is more council tax for them and then, when the venue is closed down due to noise, it will be turned into more flats – more council tax for the greedy council.

    • chris Reply

      If only they were just greedy. Inept. Unable to manage budgets more like.

Leave a Reply


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.