A 16-year-old boy has been convicted of stabbing another teenager in an attack apparently motivated by jealousy over a girl.
The boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons, denied the attack but was found guilty by district judge Tessa Szagun after a trial at Brighton Magistrates Court.
She heard evidence from the victim, and from Detective Constable Alexandra Funnel, who presented video from shop CCTV and doorbell cameras showing a masked figure matching the boy’s description walking along the same route plotted by his GPS tag.
This was to demonstrate the reliability of the GPS data which placed him at the scene of the stabbing in Lavender Street, Kemp Town, when it took place.
The court was also told other youths with the victim had initially told police the attack had taken place at The Patch, and the attacker was a 30-year-old man who appeared to be homeless.
Police initially searched both The Patch and Queens Park, but nothing was found. A second search of Queens Park uncovered the victim’s mobile phone, using location data supplied by his parents.
However police were not able to get call logs of another youth’s phone which the victim said had been used to call the attacker to tell him the victim was at Lavender House. This was because the phone’s owner did not give permission.
The court was told the attacker had previously been convicted of attempted grievous bodily harm and six other knife offences.
Two other teens, aged 17, were charged with assault. One, whose DNA was found on the victim, was found guilty. The other, also 17, who the victim said had initially attempted to stop the attack and who walked him to the Royal Sussex County Hospital, was acquitted.
All three boys are subject to gang injunctions which they breached by being in each other’s company on the day of the attack in September last year.
The 16-year-old has already launched an appeal against his conviction, which will be heard next year.
Until then, he is being held in a youth detention centre. Sentencing has been delayed until the appeal has been heard in April 2026.
There is a question of how a young person reaches 17 years of age that emotionally disjointed and unregulated. I can’t help but wonder if us adults are doing enough for our children…
I think a lot of parents should be attending “parenting” classes, that being said teens are not really encouraged to be employed from early on, 16 or so. I’ve tried to get younger guys on jobs/site but employers liabilities is the reason often quoted to me for keeping teens away from that kind of work, but they can join the Army at 16 and learn a few things, lots of choices there.
It is interesting that you mention Army, because I was reading there was a new scheme coming up in a few months to learn digital skills with the Army.
I think digital skills must be a new title for modern versions of what already exists in the Services, it would be a good job also with value in civvie life after serving, main thing really is getting the youth out of doing nothing into doing something, maybe week long mix training in co-ordination with schooling ?? give them ideas maybe.
I’ve only done light reading on it, so my knowledge on the subject is a little loose; I think you’re right, it seems like a reinvigoration. I absolutely agree with you; makes a fantastic opportunity and gives them a chance to realise their potential.
Fraggle rock
And which one are you ???
These feral criminals should be named, whatever age they are. The law should not protect criminals.
Jealously is a Dangerous thing, shouldn’t get Friends involved-but the Attacker a Coward to take a Blade out even though he should of got to the Situation sorted by Talking-instead of getting mates to get him to meet up.