Train boss says sorry to Brighton and Hove passengers

Posted On 07 Jan 2015 at 2:23 am

A train company boss has apologised to passengers from Brighton, Hove and Portslade for crowded Thameslink trains, delays and cancellations.

Southern Railway’s integration and partnership manager Larry Heyman said that driver shortages on the newly inherited Thameslink routes were to blame.

He said that the closure of London Bridge to Thameslink trains for the next three years meant an “exceptionally high level of training” had been required on alternative routes.

Mr Heyman said that passengers could claim compensation for delays of longer than 30 minutes.

In a letter to Brighton and Hove News he said: “I write to apologise to your readers for the delays and exceptionally crowded trains that Thameslink passengers recently experienced as a result of cancellations and delays triggered by a shortage of drivers.

“Anyone who experienced a delay of 30 minutes or longer for any journey is encouraged to claim compensation through Delay Repay.”

For details of how to claim, click here.

Mr Heyman said: “The reason for the driver shortage was the exceptionally high level of training required ahead of the three year closure of our cross-London route through London Bridge.

“This was not ‘basic’ training but training associated with changes to how we need to operate between now and 2018 when new dedicated Thameslink platforms at the rebuilt London Bridge station will come into use.

“The additional training covered the following

As all cross-London services are now diverted from London Bridge until 2018, drivers have had to learn a new route, including a number of diversions should any part of that route be unavailable due to infrastructure problems or a train failure.

If the normal cross-London route is unavailable for reasons referred to above or due to severe weather conditions, some services from south London, including from the Brighton main line will be diverted to Victoria Station. Drivers were required to learn this route.

There is a new track and signalling layout at London Bridge. Thameslink are running some trains to Brighton starting from and terminating at London Bridge and our drivers have had to be trained on that new layout.

The current welcome replacement of 29 of our older Thameslink fleet (class 319s) with a brand new fleet (class 387). Drivers require training on these new trains.

“Cumulatively this required our driver establishment to absorb over 900 days of training since late September.

“There are a number of reasons why training could not have started earlier, in the main relating to the retention of knowledge.

“As a general rule drivers maintain what is known as ‘competence’ by  driving trains on any route at the very least once every 12 weeks.

“As these new routes came into effect simultaneously and more new class 387 trains are being delivered almost weekly, this has been a particular challenge.

“The majority of training has been undertaken through overtime and rest day working and this put a lot of pressure on driver resilience.

“The shortage of drivers while the above training took place was inevitable based on the number of drivers inherited from the former FCC (First Capital Connect) franchise.

“It takes 14 months to train new drivers and more drivers will complete their training during the course of this year.

“We will also be recruiting many more drivers who will complete their training in 2016.

“We are determined to provide a high-quality service to our passengers in 2015 and will be doing everything possible to deliver it.”

  1. feline1 Reply

    They’ve known these closures at London Bridge were coming for years, so why didn’t they plan to have the right amount of “training” already in place?
    And this is with one of those fat-cat CEOs that earn more than the Prime Minister in place, because you’ve “got to get the best people”. Can you imagine what this would be like if we didn’t have the “best” people in charge, eh? Lol

  2. Steve Reply

    @feline1 you clearly didn’t read the statement in full as it clearly states the reasons behind why they didn’t plan ahead was because of the drivers route retentions. So learning the routes two or three years ago would have been fruitless. As a driver I know this. Err Lol…

  3. feline1 Reply

    I didn’t read it in full because it was a load of rambling self-serving waffle.

  4. Steve Reply

    @feline@ point noted and agreed…..

  5. Fiona Pattison Reply

    You can sign my change.org petition here http://chn.ge/1ArUgRf

Leave a Reply

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.