Lib Dem urges council to uphold affordable homes policy in Brighton and Hove

Posted On 14 Dec 2017 at 9:00 pm

A leading local Liberal Democrat urged Brighton and Hove City Council to uphold its own policy on affordable homes this afternoon (Thursday 14 December).

Carrie Hynds, who stood for the Lib Dems in Hove at the general election in June, handed in a petition to a meeting of the full council at Hove a Town Hall. It was signed by almost 1,100 people.

Addressing councillors in the council chamber, she said: “We call upon Brighton and Hove City Council to meet their own affordable housing targets and make developers provide 40 per cent affordable homes on sites of 15-plus units.

“Brighton and Hove City Council has been repeatedly missing its 40 per cent affordable homes target which is worsening our city’s housing crisis.

“We have recently seen approval of schemes on sites such as the old Sackville Hotel at 17 per cent affordable, the old Astoria cinema at 0 per cent affordable and 121-123 Davigdor Road at 0 per cent affordable.

“The loss of these homes is not being compensated because the 40 per cent figure is not being exceeded elsewhere.

“The Liberal Democrats call upon the council to implement its own 40 per cent target more vigorously.

“On 9 November, The Argus reported that councillors were ‘pleased’ with the outcome of the Sackville Hotel site with 10 affordable units out of 60.

“This is because the developers initially applied with only five out of 60 affordable. But the 40 per cent affordable figure would have been 24.

“Rather than look at the increase from five to 10, look at the decrease from 24 to 10. That is how those struggling to afford to live in our city will always see it and we need the council to be on our side.

“In the course of gathering signatures for this petition, I’ve spoken to people spending over half their income on rent, people living long-term in temporary emergency accommodation and people who have been shocked to see the same housing and homelessness issues here as in London.

“Quite simply, for every development that misses affordable housing targets, the housing crisis in our city deepens.

“The definition of ‘affordable’ has already been squeezed to breaking point, with the 80 per cent market rate already out of reach for many of those who live and work in our city.

“We need elected councillors to make the most of the power they have and give clear instructions to council officers that 40 per cent is a serious requirement.

“Developers often use viability assessments to argue they cannot provide the required number of affordable homes and still turn a profit.

“The Liberal Democrats call for more transparency and therefore scrutiny.

“If all councillors and members of the public could see these viability assessments, they could be compared with the final profit actually made on the site.

“We need councillors to be determined to stand up for 40 per cent affordable both in council meetings and in the media.

“The homes delivered through New Homes for Neighbourhoods and the proposed joint venture are not enough and should not be presented as the whole solution.

“Above all, developers should not be praised by councillors for delivering less than 40 per cent affordable housing.

“Transparency, scrutiny and relentless focus are all needed to truly deliver on the 40 per cent.

“Several people signing this petition warned me that in delivering it today I’d be banging my head against a brick wall. My challenge to you is to prove them wrong.”

The petition will be discussed by the council’s Tourism, Development and Culture Committee on Thursday 11 January.

  1. Christopher Hawtree Reply

    Carrie Hynds spoke very well. She raised the tone of a wild and woolly Meeting.

    Meanwhile I like, as I am sure that she (as a copy editor) does, the new coining in your headline of “Hoveu”

    This ties in with the later Notice of Motion debate about Brexit. As your coining suggests, Hove wants to be in the EU, but the vote was tight, and might have been lost if cllr Penn was at the Meeting: she is said to be among cllr Bewick’s pro-Brexit element in Labour.

    • Caroline Penn Reply

      I never normally comment, but I must correct you Chris. I have no idea why you think I supported Brexit. I campaigned for Remain and have always opppsed Brexit.

      Shame I was too unwell to attend yesterday. It sounds like an eventful evening.

    • Gerald Wiley Reply

      Christopher – have you totally lost it?

      Whilst seemingly getting confused as to whether someone is either pro or anti Brexit, and you then seem to believe that Hove could, somehow, stay as part of the EU when the rest of the UK leaves!

      I see by the footnote that you still continue to witter on about your beloved Carenegie where it appears that various community functions (such as a nuresey/cafe) that could have been performed as part of move to a combined Museum site.

      I note that in several articles you are listed as the “former Green Party Councillor” – would you care to explain what you current position is, and whether you have any aspirations to returning to a role within the city council?

  2. Frank le Duc Reply

    Thanks for flagging up a truly bizarre typing error – now corrected!

  3. rolivan Reply

    Crikey somebody talking sense at a Council meeting Committee members must have thought they were hearing a different language.

Leave a Reply


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.