Concerns about the environmental impact of a new road layout in central Brighton are due to be debated by councillors.
Conservative councillor Joe Miller, the party’s parliamentary candidate in Brighton Kemptown, plans to ask for a full environmental impact assessment of phase three of the Valley Gardens project.
Councillor Miller has put down a motion to be discussed by Brighton and Hove City Council at its full council meeting on Thursday (24 October).
His motion is expected to be seconded by fellow Tory councillor Robert Nemeth, the party’s parliamentary candidate in Hove.
The project’s bosses at the council want to scrap the Aquarium roundabout and replace it with a t-junction and traffic lights, with all private traffic moving to the eastern side of Old Steine.
It has proved controversial, winning support from environmental and transport groups, while businesses and people living in the area have called for changes.
Last week the Coast to Capital Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) approved £6 million funding for the £8 million project.
Work on phase one and two of the Valley Gardens project is well under way, with footpaths, cycle paths and road layouts changing from St Peter’s Church to Edward Street.
Councillors Miller said: “Valley Gardens Phase three has to date not been subject to a full environmental impact assessment with limited, if no, future predicted air quality assessments.
“With all the traffic being positioned on the east side of the Old Steine including now a fifth lane to serve as a south bound bus lane and the resultant narrowing of the pavement on the Kemp Town side, it is incredible that no environmental impact assessment has been done.”
They ask for the Environment, Transport and Sustainability Committee to ensure that there is a full environmental impact assessment.
As Madeira Drive would be made one-way entry-only by the Palace Pier, Councillor Miller is also calling for a full public consultation on the Duke’s Mound junction proposal.
He wants to know what the effects are expected to be on the A259 and the Waterfront project which includes a new conference centre and concert venue at Black Rock, next to Brighton Marina.
“Enabling” – or preliminary – work is about to start on the Black Rock site.
Councillor Miller said: “It has been confirmed at Environment, Transport and Sustainability Committee that the alteration of Duke’s Mound is essential for the current proposed preferred option … to achieve its alleged objectives.
“For example, for traffic including coaches to exit from Madeira Drive as the western end will be entry-only from the A259.
There appears to have been no consideration given as to how 10,000 visitors to the proposed Waterfront Development at Blackrock will enter and exit.Also the large Construction vehicles required arriving and leaving the site will somehow have to circum navigate the madeira drive dukes mound intersection which will probably mean realigning the Volks tracks if at all possible.
Also I notice that Buses and large vehicles travelling East along the Seafront and turning left to get onto the A270 will have to pull into the outside lane to navigate what appears to be a very sharp corner.
I still think that a larger roundabout would be a better option however Siemens Contract with the Council might be a reason why traffic lights are the preferred option?
if it has won support from environmental groups, what are the tories on about?
when tories pretend to push green credentials, you know something dodgy is going on
Feels like a microcosm of brexit, if the plans are environmentally friendly then why not do the study to prove it. And by that same premise there should be no worries that it will impact local businesses and residents so why not let them comment on it. i suspect the reason its not being allowed as its not actually going to achieve those goals and is probably just an excuse to introduce congestion charges in the city. I do worry what it will do to the cities prosperity especially as London road is now so run down since shoppers are unable to get there easily/cheaply.
Who do they think they’re kidding? ‘Environmental impact of the scheme’? Electoral impact more like.
Also this money should be used for affordable housing.