Revised plans to build a £150 million new Sussex Cancer Centre have been approved despite concerns over a decision to scrap almost 300 parking spaces.
The decision was made by Brighton and Hove City Council’s Planning Committee at Hove Town Hall this afternoon (Wednesday 7 May) by eight votes to one.
The original plans for the cancer centre – on the site of the old Barry Building at the Royal Sussex County Hospital – included two levels of underground parking.
According to the revised plans, they are not needed because University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, which runs the Royal Sussex, leases 530 staff parking spaces in Whitehawk and at the Racecourse and runs shuttle buses.
Neighbour Julian Redpath said that the community around the hospital welcomed the cancer centre but the new building would be too close to their homes and 21ft (6.5 metres) taller than the design approved in 2012 but with only two-thirds of the floor space.
He said that the building could be positioned further east, removing the public square to make room for a garden for patients and visitors on the Upper Abbey Road side of the hospital site.
Mr Redpath said: “Many hospitals and charities such as Martlets are incorporating such biodiverse wellbeing spaces in their cancer units and our hospital should do likewise, rather than providing an unwanted public area of hard slabs and a few planters mainly appealing to smokers and vapers.
“All around the hospital perimeter, there are public areas which the trust is incapable of keeping clean.”
Labour councillor Tristram Burden, who represents Queen’s Park ward, said that neighbours had regularly shared their concerns about the loss of 300 parking spaces from the trust’s plans.
He spent nearly two years chairing the Hospital Liaison Group, a forum for residents to hear and speak about the huge changes that have been taking place at the Eastern Road site.
Councillor Burden said: “Key workers already find parking in the area extremely challenging and this will not only exacerbate these issues (and) put great strain on local traffic in an area that already experiences a lot of congestion.
“The increase in traffic in Upper Abbey Road and Whitehawk Road are of special, significant concern and the height of the building is a massive change from the Barry Building that once stood there.”
University Hospitals Sussex representatives told councillors that more spaces were now available for patients and the public at the hospital because staff used off-site parking at Whitehawk Football Club and the Racecourse.
The trust’s planning consultant Tom Rudd, associate director of the Building Design Partnership, said that there were 1,006 parking spaces in total on and off site.
As well as the 530 spaces in Whitehawk and at the Racecourse, there were 107 parking spaces closer to the workplace for essential staff.
The trust’s director of capital development and property Roy Evans said that the new cancer centre was a priority.
Its importance had been underlined by the government’s review of the new hospitals programme which included money for the project in the first round of funding.
Mr Evans said that planning permission was essential to support the business case that had been presented to the government and to receive the money necessary to complete the building by 2030.
He said: “Since permission was originally granted in 2012, the clinical and funding landscape has shifted, with the need to refresh the proposals to align with modern healthcare needs and deliver a building within the NHS budget.
“The revised proposals help the trust to respond to rising rates of cancer nationally and achieve our goals of earlier and faster cancer diagnosis and treatment, reduced waiting times and improved outcomes for those with cancer.”
Labour councillor Tobias Sheard asked what would happen if the committee rejected the revised plans and told the trust to stick to the original scheme which was given planning permission in 2012.
Mr Evans said that there was no government funding for the original scheme so the project would not move forward.
Conservative councillor Carol Theobald said that she was on the Planning Committee when the original application went through in 2012.
She said: “There was a worry about car parking then but we understood about the underground car parking so that sort of satisfied the committee at the time.
“To go down from 390 spaces to 98 is a lot and it’s a real worry. It’s a nightmare to park anywhere near the hospital, even the multi-storey car park which I tried out.
“It’s pretty full up. I got in a tiny space and gashed my arm on a wing mirror. It was a horrible experience.”
Councillor Theobald was concerned about the knock-on effects on parking in neighbouring streets. She was the only committee member to vote against the application.
Green councillor Sue Shanks said: “We’ve heard quite a lot of reason why there’s a few issues with this application but basically this is the application we’ve got.
“We’re not entirely happy with it and it’s to do with costs why it’s changed but I can’t really see a reason for refusing this now.”
Councillor Sheard said: “I am on the fence about this but we do need a cancer centre. As I asked earlier, it’s either this or nothing.
“I am shocked and a bit angry with the trust that there wasn’t a contingency plan when the original plans came forward.
“You demolished the previous building and then: ‘Oh no, wait, we can’t deliver what we already promised. Let’s go back and change it again.’”
Labour councillor Joy Robinson said that there must be a required number of dedicated parking spaces for cancer patients in the transport plan.
She said: “It’s all very well saying, ‘yes, you can come through the Louisa Martindale (Building),’ but there’s got to be a parking space in there for them.
“I think this is so important and this is what makes it so difficult for us. I’m veering towards saying ‘yes’ whereas a week ago I wouldn’t have done but it’s so difficult.”
Eight members of the Planning Committee voted for the scheme. Councillor Theobald voted against.
So, basically BHCC has decided that the 300 parking places on the plan should be removed?
In effect the current car park at the hospital will be used by patients and visitors. Staff will use other sites, such as the racecourse and this is park and ride. Therefore space will be freed up on the site.
It’s not simply reducing spaces, more a case of managing the car parks better.
No. The hospital did that by not including it in their revised application.
Not sure how they are going to cram any more onto this tiny hospital site and how it will benefit the patients if they do. Particularly if their friends and family find it hard to visit and park and there is no space for nice gardens to help patients recover. Meanwhile a £15m helicopter pad sits on the roof completely un-useable and looking like a bomb has hit it from a distance. No mention of what happened to the 800 parking spaces promised when they started this hospital rebuilding project 10 years ago either. Everything they do the the Sussex County makes it even more of a dog’s dinner. No cohesion or joined up thinking at all. Disastrous A&E to boot.
Why is it all about the parking? We have buses that stop outside. The pier has no parking but no one complains about that. If they built a multi storey car park next to the cancer centre it would be labeled an eyesore. People forget the NHS is still free to use, if it charged for treatment they would have money to dig down and build a car park.
It’s not all about parking, but it is important. The hospital serves a much wider area than Brighton and Hove, and staff, patients and visitors come and go at all hours, often at times when transport alternatives are not available or to and from places where there is litter no service. The massive changes have increased the numbers of staff and patients. For all these reasons and more, sensible plans for extra parking were included. I have a close relative who parks at the Racecourse and uses the shuttle bus. He works in a team where staff absence and turnover are much higher than where I work, especially on cold, wet, miserable days and nights. A nurse on a ward can’t work from home. Re the Cancer Centre specifically, the lack of parking will make a genuine difference and not for the better, to many patients. This decision reeks of the Council and NHS acting in convmcert against the interests of patients, staff and the public.