A £105 million scheme to build or buy 1,000 low-cost homes in Brighton and Hove suffered a setback this evening (Wednesday 21 September).
The scheme – a proposed joint venture between Brighton and Hove City Council and Hyde Housing – was described by Councillor Joe Miller as “one of the most important things the council has ever done”.
But he reeled off a series of questions about the financial and legal implications of the scheme before members of the Housing and New Homes Committee voted to delay its decision.
They want to use the extra time to be given more information about the potential costs as the council looks at ways to tackle a housing waiting list with 23,000 households on it. Greater demand, rising rents and purchase prices are exacerbating the situation.
Councillor Miller said: “I think this is hugely risky for the council and lots of questions are unanswered … this has been rushed. It’s not ready and it delegates too much to officers.”
Councillor Peter Atkinson said: “The housing shortage is not just a national tragedy but a national scandal.”
He said that Hyde had an excellent track record and he was delighted that it was proposing working with the council to tackle the problem locally.
Councillor Steve Bell said: “I really welcome this and I hope it succeeds but I do have serious reservations.
“We were only given this information ten days ago and a briefing two days ago. That isn’t enough time. The scale of the task is monumental.”
Councillor Mary Mears said: “This is a huge amount of money wherever it’s taken from. This is a really serious issue.
“There’s real concern within our group around the governance of this.”
She said that it was important to show that going into partnership with Hyde was the right thing to do because there had been no procurement process.
“It has to be open and transparent,” she said, “particularly as there has been no procurement process.”
Councillor Mears said that there were other issues and questions that should have been addressed in the report before the committee.
And she bridled at a suggestion by Councillor Anne Meadows, who chairs the committee, that the Conservatives and Greens were playing games.
Councillor Mears added: “It is important that this is done properly.”
Please watch the archived webcast of this item from tonight’s Housng Committee meeting. It was spectacular (by council standards) with a truly standout performance from Cllr and law student Joe Miller posing a wall of questions seeking serious detail and exposing the downside rather well. It was extraordinary (until the webcast got paused BEFORE the vote!!!!)
Thank you Frank for being there to finish the story for us.
It may be presented as affordable housing but will it be when building complete? I have my doubts.
I have to agree and I am a Labour Member – The questions he raised were valid. One to watch!
It got paused? I think they were discussing financials.
It was a great Committee meeting though, passions were high. BHCC Housing are truly being taken on from all angles now, I hope to be able to sue them for discrimination in my case, enough is enough now!
It got paused during the finalising if the Grn amendment for a 15 minute break – unfortunately timed
I agree with what happened to big a risk for city tax payers if it’s not all out in the open ,,,
Cllr Meadows.. “It has to be open and transparent,” she said, “particularly as there has been no procurement process.” SINCE WHEN HAS BHCC HOUSING department been interested in any procurement process? Look at the amount you spend on “spot purchasing” “temporary, emergency” accommodation at 340% LHA rate with unscrupulous private landlords WITHOUT any contracts. Another racket… Hypocrite.
You mistyped…you mean Cllr Mears I think.
Last night’s Housing meeting per se was NOT Labour’s finest 7 hours.
Cllr Meadows was really exasperated by Joe Miller “taking an hour” to ask his WALL of questions (which just proved the item should not have been on the agenda yet as some of his questions were important outstanding details missing from the report and others demonstrated downside issues not addressed yet). I have never seen such rigour displayed in a council meeting before by a councillor.
One Labour Cllr (Hills) had only sarcasm and disdain to bring to the table. And I drew breath when Cllr Meadows accused Cllr Miller of “playing games” after his deeply responsible scrutiny of the report which must have taken him days to organise was unleashed. A monumental political blunder on her part and to my mind even a Standards issue. Cllr Mears pulled her up on it. She owes Miller a major apology.
you have been taken in by joe miller asking hypothetical questions.
for which there is no answer. The Councillors have been consulted for months. What about the mears contract that CLLR mears set UP. WHAT A SHAMBLES