Planners approve £19m scheme to build four blocks of flats on Hove hilltop site

Posted On 11 Jan 2017 at 6:42 pm

Planners have given permission for a £19 million scheme to build four blocks of flats on a hilltop site in Hove, next to the A27 Brighton bypass.

The 69 flats are for the Court Farm House site at the top of King George VI Avenue, known locally as Snakey Hill.

The site overlooks Toad’s Hole Valley where hundreds more homes are planned along with shops, workspaces, community buildings and a school.

Several members of the Brighton and Hove City Council Planning Committee had concerns about safety issues when they discussed the scheme at Hove Town Hall this afternoon (Wednesday 11 January).

The safety concerns were about traffic, the layout of a new junction, close to the roundabout by the A27, and they also related to footpath lighting.

The scheme will include a mixture of 7 one-bed, 34 two-bed and 28 three-bed homes as well as 107 car parking spaces and 132 cycle parking spaces.

An artist's impression of the Court Farm House scheme

An artist’s impression of the Court Farm House scheme

The architects Conran and Partners said: “Court Farm House is the initial phase of one of the largest open sites allocated for development within the council’s City Plan.

“The council has acknowledged that the scheme’s 40 per cent affordable housing component is not visually distinctive or separate from the private market units and will be built to the same high standards of design and quality.

“The imaginative and sensitive design is configured as four separate buildings of three to four storeys, arranged around a series of open, green courtyard spaces.”

Although the site faces the South Downs National Park, a report to councillors said that the site would not have an adverse impact.

Conran partner and project director Lee Davies said: “We believe we have set a high standard of design for this very important and prominent site that will act as a catalyst for the wider development of Toad’s Hole Valley in the future.

“Our design is appropriate in scale to the site and seeks to minimise the impact on views from the South Downs.

“It also represents a landmark building on this important gateway site and will deliver much-needed housing on the city’s urban fringe.”

Mike Holland, chief executive of the site’s owner, Thornton Properties, said: “The council’s decision recognises the high quality of the scheme which responds successfully to the challenges of the site.

“I am confident that the sensitive redevelopment of Court House Farm – and the much-needed new housing it will offer – will help to transform this significant site on the edge of the South Downs.”

The developer is being asked for a payment – known as a section 106 contribution – totalling about £420,000. The money is expected to be spent on local schools, safe lighting and transport improvements.

  1. Valerie Paynter Reply

    The rest of Toads Hole Valley is owned by a Trust (Clarks) and they should not be allowed to sit on that land for much longer. Once Pt 2 of the City Plan is in place it should be oompulsory-purchased and the land used as per the agreed City Plan.

    • Rolivan Reply

      How long has Thorntons owned it used to bé Council owned I thought and leased out.

  2. Rolivan Reply

    Access should bé à fun design.

  3. VPL Reply

    Access by helicopter or chicken running across some very busy roads. We deperately need housing though, so well done on this.

  4. owen Reply

    A pedestrian bridge would probably be the only safe way to allow for that number of people to cross and allow traffic to flow.

  5. Gordon Reply

    Thought it had something to do with the Cook family who built the Goldstone Valley estate. & just how many are living in the current site in wagons & caravans?

    • Heather Ruth Strangeways Reply

      I live opposite the proposed site. Not only is it going to create urban sprawl, a potential ghetto, noise and disruption for people in the surrounding area for years to come (some in exsisting council housing which is shoddily maintained – the views and quiet are a solace), it’s teeming with wildlife.
      The development looks good in the public eye but I’m sure there are smaller pockets of brownfield which could be developed.
      I hope it succeeds but all I envisage is horror and disruption for years to come.
      At least I have some wonderful photos of some of the beautiful butterflies and flowers in the valley.
      No travellers as far as the eye can see – a splendidly green vista!
      I can’t work out where the foxes and rabbits will go. I love foxes but will more of them end up moving into the existing estate? A potential risk to babies and toddlers?
      People who live nearby have not been well informed or properly consulted.
      I would’ve expected something altogether more considered by the Green Party as a solution to the housing issue!

Leave a Reply


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.