The Brighton i360 is due to pay £570,000 to Brighton and Hove City Council the day after tomorrow (Saturday 30 June).
But today (Thursday 28 June) councillors will decide whether to accept a request to defer the payment.
Brighton and Hove City Council’s public stance has hardened over the past few weeks.
Initially officials advised councillors to allow the seafront attraction’s owner to put on hold payments potentially totalling about £9 million.
A redrafted report, which is due to be considered this afternoon, suggests deferring just the £570,000 that is due on Saturday until the end of the year.
It doesn’t rule out relaxing the payment schedule further into the future but it makes explicit a number of conditions which would have to be met first.
And there are rumours that the Conservatives want to tighten up those conditions even further.
The line accepted by all three parties – Labour, Tories and Greens – is that the i360 hasn’t cost the council a penny so far.
Indeed, the council has banked almost £2.5 million directly and has benefited financially from a number of knock on effects too.
And none of the parties sees any advantage in pulling the plug on the business or trying to take over the attraction. This is despite an overture from Palace Pier owner Luke Johnson.
But the Tories are believed to want any short-term relief for the i360 to last only as long as absolutely necessary.
And they are thought to be angling for a bigger slice of any future profits as the price of keeping confidence with the i360 owner.
While the party declined to comment, it is understood to be hoping to persuade Labour and Green councillors to maximise the protection of taxpayers’ money while giving the i360 a financial breathing space.
Officials have proposed employing specialist consultants, with one exploring the cost and structure of the i360’s debts and the other looking at how to boost visitor numbers, lift income from other sources and cut running costs further.
The £50,000 cost of the proposed external consultants is budgeted from the council’s reserves but there are suggestions that this should be recovered from the visitor attraction eventually.
It is wriong to agree to soend £50,000 on a consultant! It is for i360 to prove its case so inhouse finance staff can judge it fit or not.
And failing to have met with Luke Johnson to hear what HIS acknowledged expertise can add to the picture, ahead if today, is unforgiveably negligent
Surely a problem of this magnitude should go before full Council.
Also have the i360s owners asked the West Pier Trust for a rent reduction at the very least.
Three years ago, The Occupied Argus published this on their facebook page.
“HEIGHT OF STUPIDITY! The i360 is a rip off we can’t afford…
Why is Brighton & Hove City Council gambling money we don’t have on things we don’t need when so many people are suffering?
While victims of unnecessary, ideological Tory austerity continue to die on our streets for lack of basic shelter, BHCC has loaned a private developer £37.5 MILLION taxpayer funds from UK Gov Plc’s “Public Works Loan Board” (PWLB) to gamble on the massively unpopular i360, (aka the doughnut on a stick).
Far from being “public”, this venture makes the PWLB look much more like a giant, private slush fund to indulge the myopic interests of the 1%, who are the only people who might be able to afford to waste £30 on the “VIP champagne experience” (with ‘priority entry’ and ‘complimentary guidebook’…)
The i360 will be a testament to everything that is wrong with our society and culture. “