Council redundancies funded from property sales, investigation reveals

Posted On 04 Mar 2019 at 12:15 pm

King’s House

Brighton and Hove City Council has used more than £2million from the sale of part of its property portfolio to fund hundreds of redundancies in the face of government cuts.

As well as its town halls, libraries and museums, the council owns hundreds of commercial properties, from seafront arch shops to park cafes and swathes of downland.

New figures obtained by the Bureau of Local Journalism published today show that in Brighton and Hove, the council made £31.8million from selling off property from April 2014 to September last year.

Most was from the 2017 sale of the Grade II listed Kings House for more than £26million to luxury property developers after the council moved its dwindling staff from Kings House to a modernised Hove Town Hall. It had first been put on the market in 2014 for £10million.

Of the proceeds from all property sales, £17.38million was allocated for service reforms, including £2.68million spent on or earmarked for restructure and redundancies. The rest was spent on improving the council’s digital systems and website, and other service modernisations.

£1.37million was spent on redundancies in 2016/17, nothing the following year and the council plans to spend £1.3million in 2019/20.

During this time, 221 people have been made redundant, most in 2016/17 when 156 people lost their jobs. All but one of these were voluntary redundancies.

Brighton Kemptown MP Lloyd Russell-Moyle said: “Any money made from the sale of council properties should be reinvested in more properties or other capital projects.

“Councils have historically relied on properties being donated to them and if we are seen to be just selling them off I think it would be a breach of trust.

“This type of arrangement with capital funds being used in an operational way, although might be technically legal I certainly don’t think follows the spirit of the law.

“And to make matters worse the Conservatives in Brighton and Hove want to cut thousands of pounds from the budget just to save a few quid on taxpayers bills leading to more redundancies and less services

“This is not just a Brighton and Hove problem, councils across the country are suffering after nine long years of austerity and it seems they’re now resorting to selling the family silver to make ends meet.”

Mark Turner, branch secretary of GMB Sussex, said that the council’s homecare service, nurseries and parks were some of the areas worst hit by redundancies in this period.

“These are Tory central government cuts. In the case of Brighton and Hove, it doesn’t matter which particular group is in power, they would have been left with cuts.

“It’s a poisoned chalice and we are still facing that today.

“You can only sell the family silver once, and once you’ve spent it, it’s gone. The government has forced local councils to do that under austerity. But Brighton hasn’t had to sell off as much as some authorities.

“What’s also happening now is there are services feeling the strain and are having a direct effect on the public, like CityClean. Adult social care and children’s services are coming to a pinch point.”

In 2014, a new strategy was drawn up to manage its property and land, more than 630 commercial properties which currently bring in an annual income of more than £10million.

By then, austerity was in full swing and as well as investing in digital transformation and other modernisation, the council said it would also be using money from property sales to “manage staffing changes” – i.e. redundancies.

Previously, all money from sales of property had to be used for capital spending – but new rules brought in from March 2016 allowed councils to spend some on reforming services, including workforce restructuring.

As well as selling off underperforming properties, the council is also creating a fund to buy new commercial properties which will give it a higher rate of return.

In a June 2016 report, officers said: “Owing to current market conditions, the council is in the process of accumulating a fund for re-investment to enable the council to act in time with the market when investment opportunities present themselves.

“The council is working to identify further assets that are underperforming to contribute towards this fund and working on an investment strategy for the identification and reinvestment of funds.”

Earlier this year, the council bought Phoenix House in West Street for £6.8million, saying it expected the income to be more than that received from the commercial properties it had already sold off.

What’s been sold?

Kings House, former council offices in Grand Avenue, Hove – sold 18 October 2017 for £26.15million to Mortar Nova Grand Avenue LLP

18 Market Street, retail unit in The Lanes, formerly Starbucks – sold 31 July 2014 for £600,000 to Lyons Investment Limited, ring-fenced for investment in “higher grade investment properties”

Land at rear Grange Meadows off Ovingdean Road – sold 23 January 2015 for £12,500 to Richard and Elizabeth Carpenter

Part of Devils Dyke Farm – six acres including a reservoir sold on 3 Feburary 2015 for £25,000 to Christopher Donald Williams, who was already farming there as a tenant. Money ringfenced for use in the Stanmer Park project.

2 Boundary Road, empty shop with a flat above – sold on 30 April 2015 for £180,000 to Brighton & Hove Properties Ltd. Hardwick Hartley successfully applied for permission to convert it into two flats.

Land at Eastbrook Farm Allotments, 3.7acres of land, mostly disused but home to The Wood Store, outside city boundary in Southwick- sold on 1 October 2015 to £3.7million to Tate Brothers Limited, owners of Newhaven’s Paradise Park

28 York Place, compulsorily purchased in 1983 from Trinity College, Cambridge for £83,000 as part of a road scheme which was never implemented. Previously leased to Corridor Gallery on a peppercorn rent and before that, squatters – sold on 24 February 2017 for £476,500 to Mr Kaie Li and Mrs Quin Lu.

Chalk Pit south of High Point – sold on 21 July 2016 for £30,000 to Sheila Onslow Marks

Park Wall Farm – the farm was let to a tenant farmer and split into three different sites following the farmer’s death. One part was let to the farmer’s son and daughter and one part was sold for use as a farm on 15 September 2016 for £303,100 to Stephen and Rosaline Toomey.
The third part, 41 and 42 Park Wall Cottages, has been sold subject to planning permission, with approval for their demolition and the construction of student housing given last month. The sale will complete once the section 106 agreement has been finalised. The proceeds of both sales will be used for the restoration of Stanmer Park.

11 Little East Street – sold on 17 October 2016 for £339,845 to Joeseph Samuel Muscat

Garden land at rear 91 Braeside Avenue sold on 27 February 2017 for £3,550 to Keith and Brendan Rummery, who own number 91.

St David’s Hall in Whitehawk Road – a community asset transferred free of charge to St David’s Hall

The council has also agreed to sell run-down offices in Belmont Street used by artists, including Same Sky, the creative force behind Burning the Clocks and the Children’s Parade. Tenants have been offered relocation to New England House. The council said it had to either sell the offices or hike the rents considerably to cover essential repairs. They are now being sold to a developer who wants to build houses there.

What hasn’t been sold?

In 2015, the Labour administration revealed plans to sell Hove Library, a listed building built using money donated by Victorian philanthropist Andrew Carnegie, and move the service to Hove Museum.

Labour – and council officers – argued that the cost of running the library was too high and said if it wasn’t sold, seven branch libraries in the city’s suburbs would have to close.

However, the plans were met with an outcry, and the Greens and Tories joined forces to thwart the sale. In 2016, a compromise was reached whereby part of the library would be leased to a nursery, to the British and Irish Modern Music Institute, and a cafe. The seven branch libraries are still running.

The Greens and Tories teamed up once more the following year to halt the sale of two pieces of downland at Poynings and Plumpton Hill.

Labour warned that scrapping the sale could put a £3.8 million Heritage Lottery Fund grant towards the £5.83 million Stanmer Park project at risk, as the council was counting on the proceeds to help fund its expected contribution of £1.42 million.

  1. Christopher Hawtree Reply

    Glad that you highlight the Carnegie Library scandal again. Though Carnegie himself was surely, at that time, more Edwardian than Victorian. This year is the centenary of his death, and he is often mentioned gratefully in Hove. He resonates. A large poster of him greets visitors to my hallway (along with Virginia Woolf’s diary entry from 1897).

    In 2016 cllr Morgan proclaimed, as if a miracle, that the Carnegie could fetch a million. That is the price of two small terraced houses nearby. Small beer (which ventilated the widespread theory that he wanted to sell it to Wetherspoons).

    We need to remain alert about the Carnegie. Mention it to residents, and their reaction is, “are they trying to close it again?”

    Which is not surprising after four officer-driven attempts to do so within twelve years. How do they keep their jobs(and lavish pensions)? This is the fundamental question

    • Peter Challis Reply

      I think a lot of residents of Hove will ask – why do we have to maintain this old, costly to maintain building, when we could have moved the library services a short distance away to a new, purpose built centre combined with Hove Museum? This could have provided community services for everyone, rather than a luddite, literary elite group who treat it as their own private lending library and saved the council more money to provide other vital services?

  2. Billy Reply

    Budgets are funny things, aren’t they? Businesses and councils perhaps hide away embarrassing events or decision mistakes in their compartmentalised figures.
    In this case, the council has been forced to make cuts, and that includes reducing their own staff. So they have to follow the law on redundancies, as any company would. They then have to find the money to lay people off, because you can’t just say goodbye to someone who has worked in your office for ten years without some legally-due compensation.
    And it doesn’t really matter where that redundancy money comes from because it’s all our money – be it from council tax paid or from council property sales.
    It IS sad that the council have been forced into asset stripping as a result of government cuts imposed from above.
    These finance issues have meant that the council has had to make hard decisions when looking at the balance sheet, and it’s sad that those decisions are then easy targets for opposing political groups – who may have had to make exactly the same decision, if their hands were similarly tied.

    The Hove library is an interesting discussion here, in the context of asset stripping. If you ask most people they will say, oh yes, save Hove Library! – because all libraries have been part of the furniture of our past. But in fact you can download a book to read for free via library online services now. And fewer people are wanting physical books, or the public space in which to read them.
    I’m in fact in favour of keeping Hove library, and all libraries – but I also understand why the older buildings either need to be sold off in favour of another space, or else the existing buildings should be adapted to modern needs, to make it better value for money in terms of the running costs that we pay for.
    In the case of Hove Library, people have mixed up their love of an old building, with the modern needs of a public library. But the underlying villain, is actually the Government, with their cuts which are forcing these difficult budgetary decisions.
    When you read these stories, please look beyond the drama of the moment or the headline.

Leave a Reply to Peter Challis Cancel reply


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.