Some thoughts on this year’s Brighton and Hove elections.
It was a great result for the Greens. In some wards where you’d expect Corbyn’s Labour to run close, the Greens put down mega majorities (Preston Park and Regency look like St Peter’s and North Laine now)
The Greens held on to their numbers in Hove (three) and were within less than 100 votes of electing a second in Goldsmid and 40 votes on regaining a seat in Central Hove.
The Greens have now also re-established a presence in Kemptown by returning a councillor in Queen’s Park and just missing out on a second.
The Tories are holding on but just. They got smashed by the Greens in Withdean and Rottingdean Coastal looks like it’s changing. Toryism isn’t gone from Brighton and Hove but it’s been pushed out of the centre bits.
Where the Greens suffered, and why they’re not in a position to be running the local authority, is their uneven distribution of votes. Individual candidates and first choice candidates piled the votes high and co-candidates just missed out.
Despite the result, this was a bad election for Labour. The consensus up until recently was Labour was going to deliver the first Corbynite majority council. But they went back on 2015.
At one point Labour were confident of taking a seat off the Greens in St Peter’s and North Laine. Instead, they’ve ended up with just two councillors in the whole of Brighton Pavilion (a massive local party in terms of membership).
Labour’s candidate selection is an embarrassment. Two of the selected candidates had to be suspended just as the short campaign began. How does that happen? Thankfully the city just scraped not having an anti-Semite elected to the council.
This Labour Group will be one of the most disorganised and divided in history. There are deep and profound ideological differences that the party has not being able to reconcile in four years.
Labour has lost some good councillors, kept some good ones and got some good ones elected. But there’s also the bad ones.
If Labour wants to retain respect in this city it will need to deal with councillors and members who publicly have made anti-Semitic or racist comments in a swift and just way. No stalling.
That’s also true for the Greens and the Tories. Our local democracy must not succumb to giving hatred a platform and for that hatred not to be paid for from the public purse.
This call for a progressive alliance from Labour group leader Daniel Yates is very welcome and seems like it’s coming from the right place. Hoping this is a new chapter in Brighton and Hove politics
I sincerely hope that sensible, pluralist voices in both the Labour and Green groups can cooperate and work together where it makes sense.
All parties and councillors must understand that they are civic leaders. However tempting it is to ramp up the rhetoric they have a responsibility to keep the tone civil, conciliatory and respectful.
I hope the Greens will maintain a respectful distance from Labour’s internal maelstrom & power struggles whilst supporting where it is obvious thre is common ground.
I don’t agree with the idea of a “progressive alliance”. This may be dead in the water anyway as its proposer Daniel Yates has announced he will stand down and will almost certainly be replaced by a Momentum candidate. Momentum will spend the first 6-12 months of the new council seeking to marginalise their more moderate colleagues and the Greens should have nothing to do with that.
I voted Green because I wanted a genuine alternative to Labour and the Conservatives. There was no mention of alliance with Labour in their election literature and it would surely be foolish to rush into an agreement without seeing much more about the intentions of the majority Labour group.
I don’t believe Labour fundamentally support green policies and I wouldn’t like to see the Greens punished for an unsatisfactory coalition in the way the the Lib Dems were nationally after coalition with the Tories.