Coronavirus crisis leaves council facing £66m cash shortfall

Posted On 07 Jul 2020 at 4:20 pm

The coronavirus crisis has left Brighton and Hove City Council facing a cash shortfall of up to £66 million, according to a report due to be discussed this week.

The estimate takes into account millions of pounds pledged by the government, some of which has already been passed on.

But the council is spending huge sums on things like personal protective equipment (PPE), housing rough sleepers and emergency grants.

At the same time, it has been facing a significant drop in income from council tax payments, parking charges and business rates and rents.

By the end of this year, the council expects to be about £36 million in the red, almost all as a result of the coronavirus crisis.

Labour councillor Daniel Yates said that the response to the covid-19 coronavirus pandemic came at “a huge and continuing additional cost”.

The former council leader – now the finance lead – said: “There are a lot of one-off costs, most of which will fall into this financial year, but some of which will fall into next year and future years.”

Councillor Yates said that there may have to be an emergency council budget in the autumn once a clearer picture had emerged.

Fees and charges could rise – and services could face cuts as a way of saving money.

But a change to the council tax would almost certainly have to wait until February or March when the council usually sets its budget.

And with the annual party conferences cancelled, he was hopeful that the government might announce the national budget earlier than usual, given the scale of the challenges ahead.

This would help councils like Brighton and Hove work out a way forward.

Councillor Yates said: “We were expecting to have some tough years ahead anyway because of the way government funding for local government has changed.”

The coronavirus crisis had brought the situation into sharp focus more quickly, he said, particularly as the council wrestled with the cost of adult social care.

Councillor Daniel Yates

A report to the council’s Policy and Resources Committee said: “Estimating costs and losses for the remainder of this financial year and beyond is clearly very difficult.

“The deficit for 2020-21 is estimated to be in the range £17 million to £39 million. The budget gap for 2021-22 is estimated to be in the range £11 million to £27 million.

“While government have provided some emergency response grant funding, currently £16.2 million, this will meet less than half of the council’s estimated costs and losses due to the pandemic.

“It is anticipated that the impacts will extend beyond the current financial year but the extent of the impact will be subject to the success, both locally and nationally, in eradicating the virus and the depth of longer-term economic shockwaves caused by the pandemic.

“Certain sectors, for example, retail, were already vulnerable prior to the pandemic and this sector may be further impacted, with a correlated impact on business rate revenues and commercial rent income from the council’s commercial property portfolio.”

Without further government support, the council – which is in a better financial position than many – is likely to dip into its reserves or savings. Much of this money was set aside for specific projects – often as a legal or policy requirement.

Councillor Yates said: “It’s basically taking money out of the rent jar to pay the electricity bill.”

Hove Town Hall where finance chiefs are wrestling with a huge bill from the response to the coronavirus crisis

The council would probably look to replenish its reserves over about 10 years – the approach that was taken when it was landed with a £38 million bill for equal pay in 2009.

Councillor Yates added: “It looks as though the government is leaving with half of the costs of doing what the government required us to do.

“The government did make grant funding available very quickly but it wasn’t as quick to recognise the scale of our costs and the scale of the impact on our finances.

“It’s not just the obvious things. We’ve had to pay for the likes of Cityclean and Cityparks with staff having to self-isolate or operate with the new social distancing measures.

Brighton and Hove City Council enforcement officers keep a social distance as they patrol the beach

“Anyone who went to a pub over the weekend would have noticed that there were half as many customers and twice as many staff.

“That’s the same challenge that the council has been facing running things like Cityclean.

“The impact of the lockdown is going to be felt a long time after lockdown ends. For some people that won’t be a major shock.

“Some might think that once they see cars on the roads and people in the pubs that everything’s all right and back to normal.

“But it’s not all right and it won’t be for quite a long time.”

The council’s Policy and Resources Committee is due to discuss the financial challenges at a “virtual” meeting starting at 4pm on Thursday (9 July). The meeting is scheduled to be webcast on the council’s website.

  1. Joanne Heuston Reply

    “At the same time, it has been facing a significant drop in income from council tax payments, parking charges and business rates and rents” ….. then maybe it would be wise to reopen Madeira Drive to get some of the parking revenue back rather than take it from us in Council Tax and help local busineses who need tourists to come back so they can pay the rent and rates.

    • Paul J Williams Reply

      How dare BHCC even DREAM of charging we tax payers for their own mindless stupidity? Council Tax strike beckons.

  2. Rob A Reply

    How about reopening Madeira Drive and not doing the A259 cycle lane that is 2.4 million per year back in revenue, (even more if you increase parking charges). Plus you save money on the 4 stewards policing Madeira Drive at the weekend. Some of the costs that occurring are actually self inflected by these planks.

    • Paul Reply

      Stop spending millions on the roads and clogging the city up. Brighton council have well and truly stuffed this place up.
      Green party contesting the city……. well done

  3. Paul J Williams Reply

    Yet they can afford to close Madeira Drive and deny this city millions in events and tourism revenue.
    Meantime the traders are on rent strike down there and threatening a class action against the council for contractual breaks, two events hosts are suing them, they are paying for parking wardens 7 days a week to stop anyone accessing Madeira Drive and they are losting the parking revenue from 393 parking spaces. You honestly couldn’t make it up! A vote of NO CONFIDENCE in this loony Momentum-led council please before they can do any more damage!
    Meantime please sign petition here to get Madeira Drive reopened.

  4. Billy Reply

    £66 millions? It was just 52millions a week ago. So the reality starts to bite.

    The short term cost of closing Madeira Drive is a loss of £1.2millions in parking (annual income). Who knows what the longer term cost is, given that major events can’t happen – events which feed the hotels, shops and restaurants with trade – and given the businesses there can’t operate in winter per without outside trade.
    Where is the city development plan – based on this new obsession with pedestrianisation? What is to replace the income lost – i.e. from the visiting spenders who are being kept out and sent elsewhere?

    When will the council ideologues wake up to the real world and stop their many acts of self harm?
    This is the most incompetent council leadership we have seen in a generation.
    No doubt they’ll just throw their hands in the air and blame Covid – or anyone but themselves.

  5. Neil Harvey Reply

    Why is there a significant drop in council tax payments?

    • Paul J Williams Reply

      Neil Harvey – more people unemployed and claiming benefits?
      Not helped by this council driving tourism and trade out of this city!

Leave a Reply


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.