• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
8 April, 2026
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Brighton

Neighbours battle over bid to scrap parking permit ban

by Jo Wadsworth
Wednesday 25 Feb, 2026 at 4:43PM
A A
7
Petition protesting about parking permit prices presented to council

People living in flats built on the site of an old maternity hospital and their neighbours are arguing over whether a parking permit ban should be lifted.

The flats were completed last year and residents have now moved in – but a condition on the original planning permission granted in 2020 bans them from getting a parking permit.

The developer, Martin Homes Buckingham Road Ltd, is now applying to have that condition removed.

The application, written by Whaleback, says: “Since the approval of the original condition, Brighton and Hove City Council no longer impose carfree conditions on planning permissions.

“Parking capacity is instead now controlled by limiting the number of parking permits … Condition 15 is therefore no longer reasonable or necessary.”

The application has been supported by five people who have lodged official comments.

One says: “As a resident of 76-78 Buckingham Road, and as an NHS clinician, I strongly support the removal of this planning condition.

“We are treated differently from people living directly across the road, despite contributing equally to the community. That disparity feels arbitrary and fundamentally unfair.”

Another said: “I understand the concerns around car traffic and pollution in our city and agree that these important issues needs managing appropriately, however I also believe that this should be done in a fair and equitable way.

“The current system is simply not fair as it discriminates us from our own neighbours even across the road.”

However, four people have objected, including one resident of the flats. They said: “When we purchased our property in 2024, we did so with the explicit understanding that this development would be car-free.

“This was a significant factor in our decision, as we value the reduced traffic and lower pollution levels that such a condition guarantees.

“Some comments supporting this change, stating that current restrictions affect property value, are completely irrelevant, because all the properties were bought with this restriction already in place.”

Anther objector, who did not disclose were they live, said: “The surrounding streets are already at maximum parking capacity.

“Allowing new residents to apply for permits will inevitably increase local congestion and air pollution.

“If the building cannot provide its own on-site parking, it must remain a car-free development as originally agreed.”

Unlike other local authorities, Brighton and Hove City Council redacts the details of those commenting.

To view or comment on the planning application, click here.

Support quality, independent, local journalism that matters. Donate here.
ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 7

  1. simon dalton says:
    1 month ago

    Everyone knows you watit a few years then permits are sold. It is therefore ridiculous and disingenuous to pretend there is such a thing as a car free devpt, the council have been dishonest about this for years. Likewise with affordable housing. Developers no longer even pretend, they simply say it is “not viable” in their scheme. The current increasingly rightwing selfish zeitgeist supports this. The irony that the successful applicants will oppose any further permits once they have theirs, just as those buying houses in hardfought opposition campaign areas will oppose further building is lost on noone. …….

    Reply
    • Kim Johnson says:
      1 month ago

      Watch out you bigotry is showing

      Reply
  2. Deano says:
    1 month ago

    Buckingham road has over a 1 year waiting list. So if you want to own a car, don’t think it’s particularly clever to buy into a car free development in an area with a massive parking shortage, maybe live in patcham…

    Reply
  3. Ann E Nicky says:
    1 month ago

    The “anther” objector did not disclose “were they live!”
    I suggest that a prerequisite of objecting must include a beating pulse rather than a piece of a plant? lol

    Reply
  4. Ann E Nicky says:
    1 month ago

    If I recall correctly, this development replaced a building that had basement and off-road parking. No doubt the purchase prices were set at a level to reflect the fact that it was a non-car development. It was a reason that planning was granted otherwise it would have been deemed an oversaturation of units. To bleat about these elemental conditions now, when there has been no amelioration of the parking situation, seems downright cheeky and disingenuous. If you want to live in the centre of town in such circumstances, you accept that you will rely on the excellent public transport system.

    Reply
  5. Kim Johnson says:
    1 month ago

    When you moved into the flat you would have known there was restrictions on parking. You cant boohoo cry about it now. If you want somewhere with parking move. Cant just change the rules because you dont like it

    Reply
  6. Al says:
    1 month ago

    Why picture of zone W???

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

Images released in hunt for man with dangerous dog

Neighbours battle over bid to scrap parking permit ban

Air ambulance responds to medical emergency on Hove seafront

Plans for new viaduct-inspired block on arson-hit site

Co-working offices ask to install rooftop hot tubs

Wanted man arrested after public appeal

Asylum-seeker who filmed alleged rape accused of telling a ‘pack of lies’

Staff survey finds fear, anger and frustration at NHS trust

Ben and Jerry’s gives out free ice cream

New date for Brighton and Hove Albion v Chelsea match

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
Who Do They Think They Are? Tusk Club, 10th April 2026

Who Do They Think They Are?

7 April 2026

Preview : Horrible Histories The Ultimate First Concert for Kids!

6 April 2026
Split Dogs get ‘Nice N Rough’ in Brighton!

Split Dogs get ‘Nice N Rough’ in Brighton!

5 April 2026
Auto Draft

One knight only as fat-witted Falstaff holds court

4 April 2026
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Manager of Brighton and Hove Albion’s women team dismissed after allegations

New date for Brighton and Hove Albion v Chelsea match

by Frank le Duc
7 April 2026
1

A new date has been set for Brighton and Hove Albion’s home league match against Chelsea. The two sides are...

Robinson inspires Sussex to 21-run win over Yorkshire at Hove

Robinson reflects on ‘clinical’ win for Sussex against Leicestershire

by Jon Culley - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
6 April 2026
0

Ollie Robinson reflected on a “clinical” win as Sussex beat Leicestershire by 222 runs in his first match as captain...

Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex wipe out points deficit with opening win over Leicestershire

by Jon Culley - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
6 April 2026
0

Sussex 361 (89.5 overs) and 364 (92.5 overs) – 22 points Leicestershire 245 (65 overs) and 258 (78.1 overs) –...

Bruce on the Boundary – Robinson ready to take the next step

Sussex well placed to win opener against Leicestershire

by Jon Culley - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
5 April 2026
0

Sussex 361 and 364 Leicestershire 245 and 125-5 Leicestershire trail by 355 runs Sussex are well positioned to wipe out...

Load More
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728  
« Jan   Mar »

RSS From Sussex News

  • Council to write off £300k in debts owed by 14 people 7 April 2026
  • Staff survey finds fear, anger and frustration at NHS trust 7 April 2026
  • Four engines sent to tackle fire in large shed next to A22 6 April 2026
  • Wanted man arrested after public appeal 6 April 2026
  • Pedestrian dies in A27 crash late last night 4 April 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News