• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
12 June, 2025
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home Brighton

Why didn’t Labour win the city’s first majority socialist council?

by Jo Wadsworth
Sunday 5 May, 2019 at 3:30PM
A A
0
Why didn’t Labour win the city’s first majority socialist council?

Brighton and Hove Labour celebrates its 20 seats at the May 8 count. By local democracy reporter Sarah Booker-Lewis

Brighton and Hove Labour celebrates its 20 seats at the May 8 count. By local democracy reporter Sarah Booker-Lewis

This was to have been the election that delivered Brighton and Hove’s first majority socialist council. So while congratulations to the successful Labour candidates who did win is clearly the order of the day, its also important to reflect on why the party fell short of its target.

This will be painful, not least for ousted councillors, candidates who lost out and the party activists who worked hard during the campaign despite reservations about what has been happening in the party locally and nationally over recent months.

But, if we want to move forward, we have to reflect on where we went wrong, as well as what went right. To kick this off, here are five urgent lessons that we should take from the results as we head into the European parliamentary elections and a still possible snap general election.

First, fence-sitting on Brexit was always going to play out badly for us and will continue to be until we can properly reflect where electorate is in our city. That means unequivocal support for the proposition that the people should have a final say — with remain as an option on the ballot paper.

Although it wouldn’t have been easy to communicate a local difference from the party’s fudged national position in this week’s local election, it wouldn’t have been impossible.

Look at Cambridge, another strongly pro-remain city where Labour held the council yesterday. The party’s manifesto included a pledge from council candidates to use their influence (working alongside their MP) to stand up for a second vote with the option to remain.

Is it any surprise that we performed better in Hove, where Peter Kyle is a high-profile Remainer? I don’t think it is.

Signalling to the city we get where they are coming from on this issue over coming weeks should involve putting ourselves in the forefront of efforts to change the party’s policy nationally. If we don’t, the consequences for the party here and indeed nationally are of an existential nature.

Secondly, we will continue to put off key groups of voters (and activists) until we have faced up to and completely resolved anti-semitism problem in our party. This ongoing crisis has continued to give an ugly but tragically accurate taint to the party’s identity in the city and nationally.

The frequency with which one still sees the argument that this is merely an issue with which to attack Jeremy Corbyn, and the expressions of solidarity from leading lights in this city with those who are suspended for anti-semitic comments, shows how difficult this will be.

Ultimately, we need more whistleblowing by the decent majority, monitoring of social media sites, extensive use of disciplinary procedures and compulsory education for all office holders.

Third, trashing the record of the previous administration and harassing and pushing out existing councillors was a huge political mistake that prevented us from making at least some of the gains we might have made. The people who led this divisive initiative need to be removed from positions of influence.

There is a quite a lot of data to show that incumbency bestows an electoral advantage, especially when there is a track record of success in delivering against a previous manifesto and recognisable political and community leaders.

The powers that be of course, trashed a decent record and opted instead for something far less tangible, that is less likely to be delivered now anyway. To make matters worse, it was clear that the move was political / ideological, rather than a move that put the city first.

This was unforgivable self indulgence. The people in our communities who would benefit most from a Labour council now pay the price.

Fourth, the failure to build momentum towards winning a majority is a good example of what happens when a local political party gets its priorities wrong.

Too many of the Labour and Momentum activists in positions of influence have made faction fighting their priority. Of course the only priority for us should be securing office so that we can make a difference to the people of the city.

Until we achieve unity, and show the people of the city that representing them is our true passion, we won’t move further forward.

Fifth, campaign organisation is too important to be left to the ideologues. When it is, as was in important respects during this election, it’s hard to achieve the kind of high-profile, joined up campaign that will help us make gains.

Look at what the Greens achieved this time. They were unified, co-ordinated and coherent. Just take a look at their social media output.

In many ways their triumph of our Labour winners is all greater because they managed to win despite the litany of stupidity: the refusal of some activists to deliver leaflets showing the success of the previous administration’s housing policy (wasting hundreds of pounds in the process), the boycotting a phone bank because it was run by someone who had campaigned against a Momentum slate, literature that only featured some of the candidates because the Momentum people didn’t like their running mate, the confusing set up of separate Momentum and Labour campaign structures and the postal vote application letters arriving the day postal vote applications closed.

It’s clearly not all gloom and doom. We are still, just about, the biggest party. Many of the winning candidates are going to be brilliant councillors.

I’m looking forward over coming days to hearing about what they thought worked and should be built upon. That, combined with the lessons above, is how we move forward.

David Arnold is a former Labour Party agent and election organiser.

ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

Illegal parking riles residents on Brighton estates

A new start for the end of the pier show

Drug dealer jailed after swinging machete at two men in Brighton

Police officer charged with sexual assaulting four women

Why didn’t Labour win the city’s first majority socialist council?

Poor outcomes for Brighton’s poorest pupils prompt call for review

Advertising screen turned down by planning inspector

Brighton school plans to join academy trust

Is your road on the weedkiller opt-out map?

Police extend bail again for former Hove MP

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
In ‘Paradise’ with Safire in Brighton

In ‘Paradise’ with Safire in Brighton

10 June 2025
Two men held after man falls over railings on to Brighton seafront lower prom

A new start for the end of the pier show

10 June 2025
‘Pozi’tive night out in Brighton

‘Pozi’tive night out in Brighton

9 June 2025
Animal Collective’s Panda Bear – Brighton gig report

Animal Collective’s Panda Bear – Brighton gig report

9 June 2025
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Brighton and Hove Albion defender signs one-year deal

Brighton and Hove Albion defender signs one-year deal

by PA sport staff
9 June 2025
0

Brighton and Hove Albion defender Tariq Lamptey has signed a new one-year contract worth more than £2 million. The deal...

Sussex Sharks open T20 Blast with a win

Sussex ease to T20 victory over Glamorgan at Hove

by Paul Weaver - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
8 June 2025
0

Sussex Sharks 195-4 (20 overs) Glamorgan 117 (15.2 overs) Sussex Sharks win by 78 runs Sussex Sharks made it three...

Sussex Sharks open T20 Blast with a win

Sussex suffer seven-wicket defeat in T20 at Hove

by Bruce Talbot - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
6 June 2025
0

Somerset maintained their 100 per cent record in the Vitality Blast after cruising to a seven-wicket win over previously unbeaten...

Sussex Sharks open T20 Blast with a win

Double success for Sussex Sharks at Hove

by Paul Weaver - ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay
1 June 2025
0

Sussex Sharks 173 (20 overs) Gloucestershire 93 (13.3 overs) Sussex Sharks won by 80 runs Sussex Sharks made it two...

Load More
May 2019
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Apr   Jun »

RSS From Sussex News

  • Gatwick-bound flight crashes 12 June 2025
  • Shop owners fear for future over plans for Body Shop HQ 11 June 2025
  • Couple jailed for stealing jewellery when viewing homes for sale 10 June 2025
  • Cyclist seriously injured in crash late last night 9 June 2025
  • Driver jailed and given 10-year ban after high-speed chase 9 June 2025
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News