Parents trying to stop the takeover of their primary school by an academy trust protested outside the workplace of one of its trustees.
Hands Off Moulsecoomb Primary School waved banners and gave out leaflets outside Meyle in Shoreham, where New Horizons Academy Trust trustee Andrew Tress, works as a sales director.
Meanwhile, members of two out of three unions representing staff at the school – the NEU and GMB – are set to walkout this Thursday in protest at the plans. Members of the third, Unison, have also voted unanimously to strike, but the result has come too late for them to strike this week.
New Horizons was this month named by the government as the sponsor set to take on Moulsecoomb Primary School following an academy order issued in the wake of an Ofsted rating of inadequate in May.
The trust has come under scrutiny after it was revealed it had to hand over another school it converted last year after more than half the staff quit, with the trust taking over the reigns, Durrington Multi-Academy Trust, hinting at financial mismanagement.
The trust denies this, saying that the takeover of The Laurels in Worthing failed because the staff’s “values did not align” with the trust’s.
Its other school, Seaside in Lancing, was taken over in 2016, following an Ofsted inspection which rated the school as outstanding, up from a previous rating of requires improvement.
The head of that school before and after it voluntarily became an academy, Lee Murley, is now New Horizons’ director of education.
Following Wednesday’s protest, parent Ulrike Hofmann said: “Ultimately, we are opposed to the privatisation of our school and will fight against any trust chosen to take over our school, but New Horizons Academy Trust is not fit for purpose.
“The only school they currently run has never been inspected by Ofsted. The only other school they have previously run was transferred to another trust after they made a mess of it.
“This is blatant favouritism from the Government towards the academy model, when they are trying to push through the privatisation of Moulsecoomb Primary School without any chance to prove that we are not inadequate.”
Parent campaigner, Natasha Ide, who also attended the protest said: “We had an amazing turnout for the protest and our message was loud and clear. Along with our kids, we handed out flyers to cars and passers-by.
“We were really encouraged by the beeping of horns and conversations that we had. “We don’t want to be standing outside in the cold protesting, but we did it because we care so passionately about this campaign. If we have to, we will do it again.
“All we ask is for New Horizons Academy Trust to listen to the wishes of parents and walk away. They chose to be the sponsor for our school, and they can choose not to be.”
Lloyd Russell-Moyle, who is campaigning to be re-elected as MP for Brighton Kemptown, provided lifts to some of the protesters. Of the protest he said: “No academy trust, great or small, is welcome in Moulsecoomb. Parents and staff have categorically rejected this forced academisation and I wholeheartedly support their campaign to keep our local school democratically accountable.
“It was an honour to be part of this protest and meet again such incredibly dedicated and passionate parents.”
I can see from the article it’s unfortunately driven by politics. The facts re the children’s education should determine which is best for their education. I firmly believe all councils should be non political as they do cloud the issues
The best for my child is that her educational funding goes towards her education and qualified staff, not towards “central services” like OTT salaries of CEOs like this. That’s not political but certainly common sense! Moulsecoomb HAS improved since the inspection so where is common sense to re inspect and stop the “privatisation”?
This matter is far more complicated than it seems and to banalise it into a pure political move is short sighted and NOT in the interest of children at all.
I strongly believe that my childs funding should be used for her education and qualified staff not on a CEOs salary. The LA charges,I believe, 1.3% of funding for their services to school. New Horizons charges 4% of funding for their “central services” like a substantially higher salary of a CEO, sorry for a “Director of Education”. Considering funding cuts I find this appalling and wholeheartedly disagree with diverting money away from children’s education. In my opinion this is common sense and not political. It is the duty of parents to stand up for their children.
Why are they protesting outside the offices of one of the trust leaders?
Shouldn’t they be complaining to OFSTED for requiring the school becoming an academy? Or what about the council who ignored the problems and just congratulated themselves on how well the council and head teachers had got good OFSTED results?