A new homeless scheme set up in response to a council resolution to use empty spaces to house rough sleepers has come under fire from campaigners who say it is curtailing tenant rights.
Space Mates, a homeless advocacy organisation, is hoping to set up a pilot project to house 15 homeless people at the Synergy Centre, with four already sleeping there.
It says it came up with the scheme after the Synergy Centre was approached by Green councillors to see if its space could be used before it is sold in October. Homeless people will be appointed “property guardians” of the centre, and helped to transition back into settled accommodation and employment.
But the Brighton Benefits Campaign say it is a backdoor to eroding tenants’ rights, with homeless people paying rent via housing benefit but still able to be evicted at short notice and the space they live in accessed not just by the centre management but also hired out for public meetings.
And one such meeting, organised by the local Labour party and ironically discussing the housing crisis, is going to be picketed tomorrow in protest at what the BBC says it a scheme to provide cheap security for private companies while attacking housing rights.
Steve Parry of BBC said: “It is unacceptable that campaigners for tenants’ right have ended up encouraging the use of the Guardianship scheme, a scheme that is threatening to become the norm, and which has already created an underclass of renters with severely curtailed rights, who live in miserable and legally dubious conditions.
“It is dangerous that housing campaigners and charities have accepted uncritically the ideology that the poor should be ‘grateful’ for substandard accommodation because they have no choice but the street. If this ideology is normalised, all landlords will adopt it, and most of us will end up living in slums if not actively homeless.”
Among the concerns raised by BBC are:
- The guardianship agreement explicitly says guardians have no tenancy rights, and allows for immediate evictions
- The housing will consist of “pods” which have yet to be built, with the four guardians already living there sleeping on sofas and mattresses
- Only one shower for up to 15 people
- The space is accessed by centre management and can be hired to the public
- Residents are asked to claim housing benefit
- Safety issues arising from Space Mates’ willingness to take on guardians with ongoing mental health, alcohol or drug problems while there is currently no night supervision
- The centre will close in October when it is sold to a developer which plans to knock it down and build a hotel there
Space Mates is run by Adam Palk, a former director of the Synergy Centre, and BBC says he has teamed up with another former Synergy Centre director Nick Parker to run the property guardians project.
On the Space Mates website, Mr Palk said that the scheme was run : ” It has never been the plan to acquire profit to line the pockets of management and staff alike. So far I have spent a large amount of my own money to get things started and co-director of the Synergy Centre has spent £30k of his own money investing in the project, money he has yet to recoup.
“In the design stage of the project, homeless people themselves attended a number of meetings to help design a project that was both deliverable and would meet their needs.
“All the beneficiaries currently living at the centre do so out of choice. All residents are interviewed, assessed, risk assessed and interviewed before entering into the project and three managers are on call 24/7.
“We have started off slow, inviting in four residents that have been a part of the project from the beginning stages of planning and development, as well as Big Issue vendors we have known for some time.
“All residents were told exactly what their rights were and how the project will be run. All of the beneficiaries accepted the offer and felt that this was and is an amazing opportunity to get off the streets and take some time to get back on their feet.”
He said that guardians were not required to pay a service charge as happens with other similar schemes, and that the only responsibilities they had as part of their role were basic, such as checking fire doors are closed, and that a contract of paid employment had been offered to one guardian.
He said that nobody with ongoing mental health or substance issues had yet been chosen as guardians, and that while one eviction had taken place, this was as a result of threatening or criminal behaviour, the only basis for eviction.
He added: “Valuable time is having to be spent defending the project from baseless attacks that could be better spent helping homeless people. We wonder how much time the Brighton Benefits Campaign spend helping homeless people – volunteering at homeless projects for example. It is much easier to criticise than to do anything constructive.
BHCC Adult Social Care and Sussex Partnership NHS Trust already normalize the ideology the “the the poor should be ‘grateful’ for substandard accommodation because they have no choice but the street”. BHCC ASC/SP spend eye-watering sums to a small coterie of private landlords who sell revolting, slum, temporary, emergency accommodation. The expenditure (40-140/NIGHT, per revolting bedsit), without any contracts, smacks of recklessness and is wide open to financial impropriety. BHCC is the single biggest purchaser of the worst quality accommodation on offer in this city – millions spent without contracts. Some people dumped in temporary accommodation for months and years at >3x the going bedsit rate (5 x LHA rate). The fact that a few private landlords who enjoy such lucrative sponsorship from BHCC for such poor offering is indefensible.
Error:
Steve isn’t a member of Brighton Benefits Campaign, although he is concerned with what’s happening at the Synergy Centre. He just circulated BBC’s report on an email list. The ‘quotation’ is actually taken from the report! Plainly nobody from Brighton Benefits Campaign was actually interviewed for this article.
The person in “paid employment” has been evicted with no where to go . This “project” pretends to give hope but just gives and then takes away from already vulnerable people.