Few people under 35 and no under 18s are getting involved with the council’s housing teams, according to research by Brighton and Hove City Council’s community engagement team.
The officials who support communities living on housing estates want to hear a wider range of voices from residents who are working with the council to improve housing services.
A draft version of the council tenant and leaseholder engagement strategy went before “virtual” meetings of the four housing area panels, made up of tenant and leaseholder representatives as well as councillors.
Residents’ representatives heard how 90 per cent of people taking an active role on estates were over 50 yet more than a third of tenants were under 50.
As well as a shortage of young people, there are few if any housing tenants from ethnic minority groups taking an active role, despite making up 10 per cent of people living in council housing.
Action proposed to reach more people include the community engagement team door knocking, carrying out surveys, supporting arts, cultural and fun days or events, as well as developing more social media and online groups.
Community engagement officer Keely McDonald said that one of the areas where more people could get involved was with the estate development budget.
This budget allows residents to bid for money to improve council housing department-owned land or community rooms in their area.
Examples in east Brighton include installing new pathways on the Craven Vale Estate and installing picnic tables and benches in Woodingdean.
She said that the budget was supposed to empower residents but only a small percentage of tenants and leaseholders were making use of it and submitting bids.
As well as physical projects, the budget could – for example – be used to pay for a baby and toddler group, she said, as one of the aims was to increase the use of community rooms.
Ms McDonald said: “We want to make sure there are fun activities and a diverse range of opportunities for people to be involved.
“We want an improved social media presence, both with the ommunity engagement team and the groups themselves to have their own social media presence.”
Conservative councillor Dee Simson questioned the effectiveness of community engagement.
She said: “We’ve been around the block so many times with community engagement and involving people, new people. It just doesn’t seem to work.
“I don’t see anything new that would make a difference but I would love to think it would.”
Design a consultation for young people and they will get involved. Putting on a website and 80 page draft reports aren’t going to get you nowhere. I agree with Mary Mears
Any lack of involvement is the lack of creativity around engagement.
Get into the north of Whitehawk, loads of great ideas coming. Political interference is the issue and will always be. Suggest the areas councillors be fair, support and work to get that valley social centre back in residents hands. Young people taking the lead, so many inspirational people in the area who are not being empowered enough.
Look to groups who have done successful consultations, we know they exist!
Ironically this report vilifies me and what I’ve been saying about the participation, the myth about me abusing older people is a lie, it was about calling out the inequality in resident involvement. Now backed up by this report, which shows its the same people and all over 50’s. I welcome their knowledge and experience, its when they control everyone and anyone, thats the issue.
They don’t speak for younger people. They try to. They want younger participation, I just think if they release their reigns more, and evolve young participation will come back.
One great way will be when the new park extension gets built, Park Life Brighton is run by two young people. I think one of the only groups in the area run by young people and from the area of benefit.
I did write to a few councillors regarding participation of younger people in the public process, there was not much will to change and evolve.