Housing team keen to hear younger voices

Few people under 35 and no under 18s are getting involved with the council’s housing teams, according to research by Brighton and Hove City Council’s community engagement team.

The officials who support communities living on housing estates want to hear a wider range of voices from residents who are working with the council to improve housing services.

A draft version of the council tenant and leaseholder engagement strategy went before “virtual” meetings of the four housing area panels, made up of tenant and leaseholder representatives as well as councillors.

Residents’ representatives heard how 90 per cent of people taking an active role on estates were over 50 yet more than a third of tenants were under 50.

German Doner Kebab

As well as a shortage of young people, there are few if any housing tenants from ethnic minority groups taking an active role, despite making up 10 per cent of people living in council housing.

Action proposed to reach more people include the community engagement team door knocking, carrying out surveys, supporting arts, cultural and fun days or events, as well as developing more social media and online groups.

Community engagement officer Keely McDonald said that one of the areas where more people could get involved was with the estate development budget.

This budget allows residents to bid for money to improve council housing department-owned land or community rooms in their area.

Examples in east Brighton include installing new pathways on the Craven Vale Estate and installing picnic tables and benches in Woodingdean.

She said that the budget was supposed to empower residents but only a small percentage of tenants and leaseholders were making use of it and submitting bids.

As well as physical projects, the budget could – for example – be used to pay for a baby and toddler group, she said, as one of the aims was to increase the use of community rooms.

Ms McDonald said: “We want to make sure there are fun activities and a diverse range of opportunities for people to be involved.

“We want an improved social media presence, both with the ommunity engagement team and the groups themselves to have their own social media presence.”

Conservative councillor Dee Simson questioned the effectiveness of community engagement.

She said: “We’ve been around the block so many times with community engagement and involving people, new people. It just doesn’t seem to work.

“I don’t see anything new that would make a difference but I would love to think it would.”

Another Conservative councillor Mary Mears said that she did not like to say that she had heard it all before but she had seen many presentations on community engagement.

She said: “The only way this will ever work is bottom up. You can’t tell tenants what you’re going to do.

“You have to listen to tenants as to how they want to be engaged and how they want to be involved. If it’s top down, it never actually works.”

Ms McDonald said that the team was being proactive by working with community groups and the plan was created in consultation with residents.

Labour councillor Gill Williams said that a leaseholders’ forum last year worked well and she hoped that a virtual meeting would work in the same way.

She also wanted to see tenants and leaseholders involved in the procurement process as people were frequently concerned about the cost of works.

Councillor Williams said: “We have had some successes already and we can learn a lot and build from them.

“We’ve got some great things going on with the community on the Bristol Estate.

“We have a fantastic Robert Lodge kitchen, which is moving up to Kingfisher and going to carry on feeding East Brighton with 140 meals a day.

“We have a community garden which is doing really well. I’m seeing initiatives that have come from residents, and we have assisted them.”

The council’s Housing Committee will discuss the community engagement plans when it meets in the new year.

  1. Daniel Harris Reply

    Design a consultation for young people and they will get involved. Putting on a website and 80 page draft reports aren’t going to get you nowhere. I agree with Mary Mears

    Any lack of involvement is the lack of creativity around engagement.

    Get into the north of Whitehawk, loads of great ideas coming. Political interference is the issue and will always be. Suggest the areas councillors be fair, support and work to get that valley social centre back in residents hands. Young people taking the lead, so many inspirational people in the area who are not being empowered enough.

    Look to groups who have done successful consultations, we know they exist!

  2. Daniel Harris Reply

    Ironically this report vilifies me and what I’ve been saying about the participation, the myth about me abusing older people is a lie, it was about calling out the inequality in resident involvement. Now backed up by this report, which shows its the same people and all over 50’s. I welcome their knowledge and experience, its when they control everyone and anyone, thats the issue.

    They don’t speak for younger people. They try to. They want younger participation, I just think if they release their reigns more, and evolve young participation will come back.

    One great way will be when the new park extension gets built, Park Life Brighton is run by two young people. I think one of the only groups in the area run by young people and from the area of benefit.

    I did write to a few councillors regarding participation of younger people in the public process, there was not much will to change and evolve.

Leave a Reply


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.