• About
    • Ethics policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ownership, funding and corrections
    • Complaints procedure
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
Brighton and Hove News
20 February, 2026
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Community
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Food and Drink
  • Sport
    • Brighton and Hove Albion
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Brighton and Hove News
No Result
View All Result
Home 999

Fire staff ‘disgusted’ as councillors make vital public safety decision in secret

by Frank le Duc
Thursday 9 Jan, 2020 at 1:21PM
A A
5
Fire deaths cited as safety rules updated by Brighton and Hove councillors

Fire staff said that they were disgusted to have been thrown out of a meeting where a crucial decision about public safety ended up being made in secret.

And heartbroken staff fear that lives will be put at risk as a result of the decision being made without input from those working on the front line.

East Sussex Fire Authority, which oversees the fire service in Brighton and Hove, voted – behind closed doors – to entrust the handling of its 999 calls to a control room run by Surrey Fire and Rescue Service.

Surrey was rated inadequate in an official report – the worst rating – with inspectors raising “serious concerns” about the fire service’s performance in keeping people safe.

After the public were ordered out of the meeting at County Hall, in Lewes, including East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service staff, Steve Oakman, from the Fire Brigades Union (FBU), backed colleagues who described the decision to hold the debate in secret as “disgusting” and “disappointing”.

One of the fire authority members who called for the debate to take place in public, Councillor Kathryn Field, said: “We are not discussing the confidential tendering of commercial contracts and we are discussing spending large amounts of public money.”

One member of control room staff said: “The public have a right to know when a decision is made that could put lives at risk.

“We understand when there is a need for commercial confidentiality but there are no business interests at stake today.”

Mr Oakman, the FBU secretary for East Sussex, said: “This will lead to a detriment to fire control which will put lives at risk. That’s been apparent from what is going on already in Surrey.

“It will also lead to a loss of the local knowledge of our control staff and, of course, job losses as well.”

The control room currently has 28 “full-time equivalent” staff who fear losing their jobs although Deputy Chief Fire Officer Mark O’Brien said that they would be transferred to Surrey or redeployed if possible.

The meeting was told that the FBU had sent Surrey Fire and Rescue a “safety critical notice” because of concerns about “failings” at its control room in Salfords.

The “advisory” document was also shared with senior officers in East Sussex as well as the councillors who serve as members of the fire authority.

West Sussex Fire and Rescue has already joined forces with Surrey for control room operations after pulling out of an arrangement with East Sussex in a move known as “Wexit”.

West Sussex itself is subject to a reinspection next week by the official watchdog, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services.

Since West Sussex shifted its control from operations to Surrey last month, staff at one fire station alone – Haywards Heath – have submitted at least a dozen “hazard reports”.

East Sussex Fire Authority members were told that these were mostly technical teething problems.

Mr O’Brien said that the decision was driven by “operational benefits” rather financial savings although the Surrey deal will cost about £11 million over seven years.

A standalone control room for East Sussex, which staff said would be safer, especially if run alongside the Sussex Police control room, was estimated to cost about £15 million – a level that Mr O’Brien said taxpayers could not afford. It would potentially lead to savings having to be made elsewhere by fire chiefs, possibly from frontline services.

But a bigger pool of staff covering three counties would allow for greater resilience, Mr O’Brien said, and opportunities for more collaboration on training and the efficient use of equipment and other resources.

The control room in East Sussex, which handles about 9,000 calls a year, has previously moved from Lewes to Eastbourne and – six years ago – to Haywards Heath.

Staff emphasised the value of local knowledge and noted that the Surrey control room had recently sent a Worthing crew to a false alarm in Brighton and crews from Haywards Heath and Burgess Hill to a crash in Eastbourne.

Mr Oakman said: “When someone in Brighton phones someone in Surrey, they’re not going to have the same local knowledge.

“Control room staffing is at a level that’s already chilling at times. Why would you make it worse?”

Support quality, independent, local journalism that matters. Donate here.
ShareTweetShareSendSendShare

Comments 5

  1. Tony Morris says:
    6 years ago

    You have to wonder about the sanity of Councillors who choose to hand over emergency call handling to Surrey County Council when it is already failing to perform properly and safely. Surrey and West Sussex County Councils are already failing their residents and putting them at unnecessary risk. Drastic measures are needed to ensure the Surrey control is properly staffed to handle calls in Surrey & West Sussex. If East Sussex Fire Authority insist on going ahead with this, without ensuring that staffing in Surrey’s control is doubled, then they will be putting the lives of their residents in danger.

    Reply
  2. Susan Sullivan says:
    6 years ago

    I live in Surrey, the fire service has been cut to the bone! We now have large areas of Surrey that have had fire cover withdrawn overnight! It is terrifying.

    Reply
    • Valerie says:
      6 years ago

      What were they thinking…..oh wait…

      Reply
    • Valerie says:
      6 years ago

      What were they thinking…..oh wait…

      Reply
  3. Jacqui says:
    6 years ago

    The sheer waste of money spent on these projects over the last 10 years whilst other frontline services have been cut to the bone is shocking and should be scrutinised at a public enquiry. There can only be one reason to hold the meeting in private, sheer shame.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most read

Council plans to house more homeless families in council flats

Café can become gym after plans approved

School building to become temporary charity hub

New mural encourages tourists into the North Laine

Four surgeries set to move into new medical centre

Fire staff ‘disgusted’ as councillors make vital public safety decision in secret

Trial set for Brighton man charged with trying to rape child

Man arrested for perverting justice in Cityclean investigation

Drinks licence granted for site just south of St Peter’s Church

Hove man given ‘slavery and trafficking risk order’

Newsletter

Arts and Culture

  • All
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Food and Drink
Aussie pub-punkers Mini Skirt announce Brighton gig

Aussie pub-punkers Mini Skirt announce Brighton gig

20 February 2026
It’s time to get all Bleary Eyed

It’s time to get all Bleary Eyed

20 February 2026
Brighton Festival at 60

Brighton Festival at 60

19 February 2026
Caroline offer ‘Total Euphoria’ at Chalk

Caroline offer ‘Total Euphoria’ at Chalk

19 February 2026
Load More

Sport

  • All
  • Brighton and Hove Albion
  • Cricket
Manager of Brighton and Hove Albion’s women team dismissed after allegations

Brighton and Hove Albion dumped out of FA Cup by Liverpool

by PA sport staff
14 February 2026
5

Liverpool 3 Brighton and Hove Albion 0 Curtis Jones’s first goal in over a year paved the way for Liverpool...

Brighton and Hove Albion boss trusts in teens in FA Cup tie at Anfield

Brighton and Hove Albion boss trusts in teens in FA Cup tie at Anfield

by Frank le Duc
14 February 2026
0

Brighton and Hove Albion boss Fabian Hürzeler has handed another start to two teenagers as the Seagulls face Liverpool at...

Residents upset by removal of match day guest parking permits

Manchester City fan banned over assault after Brighton and Hove Albion match

by Frank le Duc
14 February 2026
0

A Manchester City fan has been banned from going to matches for three years for attacking a cyclist after a...

Own goal agony for Brighton and Hove Albion at Aston Villa

Own goal agony for Brighton and Hove Albion at Aston Villa

by PA sport staff
11 February 2026
0

Aston Villa 1 Brighton and Hove Albion 0 Jack Hinshelwood scored a late own goal which handed Aston Villa a...

Load More
January 2020
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Dec   Feb »

RSS From Sussex News

  • Ex-PM sends memo about former prince to Sussex Police 20 February 2026
  • Teenage BMW driver banned – again 19 February 2026
  • Gross misconduct found after police officer deceived vetting 19 February 2026
  • Fatal crash witnesses sought by police 18 February 2026
  • Killer awaits sentence in prison 17 February 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy
  • Complaints
  • Ownership, funding and corrections
  • Ethics
  • T&C

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Opinion
  • Arts and Culture
    • Music
    • Theatre
  • Sport
    • Cricket
  • Newsletter
  • Public notices
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Brighton and Hove News